IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.49year2015issue4pp271-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreign direct investment and welfare nexus in sub Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Sheereen Fauzel*
  • Boopen Seetanah
  • RV Sannassee

    (University of Mauritius, Mauritius)

Abstract

Governments of developing countries have been targeting poverty alleviation and deprivation as their main goal and thus have been working for pro poor growth. It is observed that African countries need considerable amount of investment in order to help their economies to prosper. African countries can benefit from growth through foreign investment which is seen as an important source of capital flows. However, even if growth is important for an economy, it is not a good indicator of social development. Welfare can be worsen if growth attained by a country is not pro poor and can also result in an increase in inequality gap. In this regards, this study is based on the investigation on FDI and poverty alleviation or welfare maximization in selected Sub Saharan African countries. The present paper takes a different approach in analyzing the impact of FDI on poverty reduction. In the context of selected Sub Saharan African countries and over the period 1990-2010, a dynamic Panel vector error correction model is adopted. In effect the Vector autoregressive model or the vector error correction model is of great importance in showing the dynamic behavior of economic time series and for forecasting. Also, it often provides better forecasts and describes theory-based simultaneous equations models. Thus, given the endogeneity and causality issues, using such a model can prove to be highly beneficial. The main variables used are FDI net inflows and poverty headcount index. Other variables used in this study include the unemployment rate, inflation, openness, government debt and government expenditure, education level and GDP per capita. The results suggest that indeed FDI is an efficient tool in fighting poverty both in the short run and long run with the sample of countries considered. Moreover, the results favor a uni directional relationship between FDI and social welfare (poverty reduction) and a bi directional causality between FDI and economic welfare (Economic growth). According to this study, foreign investment is an important ingredient for both economic and social development for Sub Saharan African countries. Hence, the government should devise appropriate policies to attract such capital flows. These can be in terms of an improvement in institutional capacity and easier administrative procedures which would surely favor the entrance of foreign firms in the host countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheereen Fauzel* & Boopen Seetanah & RV Sannassee, 2015. "Foreign direct investment and welfare nexus in sub Saharan Africa," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(4), pages 271-283, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue4:pp:271-283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v049/49.4.fauzel.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Robert J. Barro, 1998. "Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262522543, December.
    3. Kaddour Hadri, 2000. "Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 3(2), pages 148-161.
    4. Canova, Fabio & Ciccarelli, Matteo, 2013. "Panel Vector Autoregressive Models: A Survey," CEPR Discussion Papers 9380, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Swamy, P A V B, 1970. "Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 311-323, March.
    6. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    7. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, Ron, 1995. "Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 79-113, July.
    8. Gary Koop & Dimitris Korobilis, 2019. "Forecasting with High‐Dimensional Panel VARs," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 81(5), pages 937-959, October.
    9. Francesco Daveri & Guido Tabellini, 2000. "Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 15(30), pages 48-104.
    10. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    11. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt, 1994. "Growth and Unemployment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 61(3), pages 477-494.
    12. Granger, Clive W. J. & Swanson, Norman R., 1997. "An introduction to stochastic unit-root processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 35-62, September.
    13. World Bank, 2015. "World Development Indicators 2015," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21634, December.
    14. Bean, Charles & Pissarides, Christopher, 1993. "Unemployment, consumption and growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 837-854, May.
    15. World Bank, 2016. "World Development Indicators 2016," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 23969, December.
    16. Luciano Gutierrez, 2002. "On the power of panel cointegration tests: A Monte Carlo comparison. Economics Letters, 80(1):105-111," Econometrics 0211003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 May 2003.
    17. Maddala, G S & Wu, Shaowen, 1999. "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(0), pages 631-652, Special I.
    18. Gutierrez, Luciano, 2003. "On the power of panel cointegration tests: a Monte Carlo comparison," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 105-111, July.
    19. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 1996. "Cointegration and speed of convergence to equilibrium," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 117-143.
    20. G. S. Maddala & Shaowen Wu, 1999. "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 631-652, November.
    21. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    22. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ofori, Isaac K. & Asongu, Simplice A., 2022. "Repackaging FDI for Inclusive Growth: Nullifying Effects and Policy Relevant Thresholds of Governance," MPRA Paper 111359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ehouma Jacques Allou & Bosede Ngozi Adeleye & Jianhua Cheng & Rehman Abdul, 2020. "Is there a nexus between China outward foreign direct investment and welfare in Côte dʼIvoire? Empirical evidence from the Toda–Yamamoto procedure," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(3), pages 499-510, September.
    3. MT Musakwa, 2023. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Influence Poverty In Zimbabwe? A Multivariate Approach," Working Papers AESRI-2023-26, African Economic and Social Research Institute (AESRI), revised Aug 2023.
    4. Marwa Lazreg & Ezzeddine Zouari, 2018. "The relationship between FDI, poverty reduction and environmental sustainability in Tunisia," Working Papers hal-01756733, HAL.
    5. Musakwa Mercy T. & Odhiambo Nicholas M. & Nyasha Sheilla, 2021. "The impact of foreign capital inflows on poverty in Vietnam: An empirical investigation," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 31-49, December.
    6. Khobai Hlalefang & Hamman Nicolene & Mkhombo Thando & Mhaka Simba & Mavikela Nomahlubi & Phiri Andrew, 2018. "The FDI-Growth Nexus in South Africa: A Re-Examination Using Quantile Regression Approach," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 33-55, December.
    7. James Temitope Dada & Taiwo Akinlo, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa: does environmental degradation matter?," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Jasnine MOGEM KOUAM & Luc NEMBOT NDEFFO & Mathurin Aimé MEKAM POUATCHA, 2020. "Foreign Direct Investment-Trade nexus in sub-Saharan Africa: Does the institutional quality matter?," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 5-14.
    9. Musakwa, Mercy T, 2022. "Does foreign direct investment influence poverty in Zimbabwe? A multivariate approach," Working Papers 29798, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    10. M.T. Magombeyi & N.M. Odhiambo, 2017. "Causal relationship between FDI and poverty reduction in South Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1357901-135, January.
    11. Musakwa Mercy T. & Odhiambo Nicholas M. & Nyasha Sheilla, 2021. "The impact of foreign capital inflows on poverty in Vietnam: An empirical investigation," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 31-49, December.
    12. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2022. "Does poverty deter foreign direct investment flows to developing countries?," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 297-330, February.
    13. Musakwa Mercy T. & Odhiambo Nicholas M. & Nyasha Sheilla, 2021. "The impact of foreign capital inflows on poverty in Vietnam: An empirical investigation," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 31-49, December.
    14. Magombeyi, Mercy T & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2017. "Foreign direct investment and the poverty reduction nexus in Tanzania," Working Papers 22775, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    15. Magombeyi, Mercy T & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2017. "FDI and poverty reduction in Botswana: A multivariate causality test," Working Papers 22656, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    16. MT Musakwa & N.M. Odhiambo, 2021. "The Impact of Foreign Capital Inflows on Poverty in Vietnam: An Empirical Investigation," Working Papers AESRI-2021-10, African Economic and Social Research Institute (AESRI), revised Oct 2021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swamy, Vighneswara & Dharani, Munusamy, 2019. "The dynamics of finance-growth nexus in advanced economies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 122-146.
    2. Bulent Guloglu & R. Tekin, 2012. "A Panel Causality Analysis of the Relationship among Research and Development, Innovation, and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(1), pages 32-47, June.
    3. Vighneswara Swamy & Dharani M, 2020. "The tipping point of financial development? – evidence from OECD countries," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 125-165, February.
    4. Daniel, Betty C. & Shiamptanis, Christos, 2013. "Pushing the limit? Fiscal policy in the European Monetary Union," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 2307-2321.
    5. Schneider, Nicolas & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2023. "Modelling the unit root properties of electricity data—A general note on time-domain applications," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    6. Angeliki N. Menegaki, 2019. "The ARDL Method in the Energy-Growth Nexus Field; Best Implementation Strategies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Skare, Marinko & PORADA-ROCHON, Małgorzata, 2022. "The role of innovation in sustainable growth: A dynamic panel study on micro and macro levels 1990–2019," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Peñasco, Cristina & del Río, Pablo & Romero-Jordán, Desiderio, 2017. "Gas and electricity demand in Spanish manufacturing industries: An analysis using homogeneous and heterogeneous estimators," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 45-60.
    9. Betty C. Daniel & Christos Shiamptanis, 2008. "Fiscal policy in the European Monetary Union," International Finance Discussion Papers 961, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    10. Bittencourt, Manoel, 2012. "Inflation and economic growth in Latin America: Some panel time-series evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 333-340.
    11. Hlalefang Khobai & Clement Moyo, 2021. "Trade openness and industry performance in SADC countries: is the manufacturing sector different?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 105-126, February.
    12. Mushtaq Ahmad Malik & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Dynamics of Output Growth and Convergence in the Middle East and North African Countries: Heterogeneous Panel ARDL Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1444-1469, June.
    13. Vighneswara Swamy & Munusamy Dharani, 2020. "Thresholds of financial development in the Euro area," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1730-1774, June.
    14. Uslu, Çağrı Levent & Aydoğan, Ebru Tomris & Ketenci, Natalya, 2015. "Economic Growth, Financial Development, and Trade Openness in Emerging Markets: Panel Approach," MPRA Paper 64722, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Andreas Dietrich, 2012. "Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 915-944, December.
    16. Declan French, 2012. "Causation between health and income: a need to panic," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 583-601, April.
    17. Škare, Marinko & Porada-Rochoń, Małgorzata, 2023. "Are we making progress on decarbonization? A panel heterogeneous study of the long-run relationship in selected economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Mehmood, Bilal & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Jiao, Zhilun, 2023. "Do Muslim economies need insurance to grow? Answer from rigorous empirical evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 346-359.
    19. Ozcan, Burcu, 2013. "The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1138-1147.
    20. Guloglu, Bulent & Tekin, R. Baris & Saridogan, Ercan, 2012. "Economic determinants of technological progress in G7 countries: A re-examination," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 604-608.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Poverty reduction; FDI; Panel VECM and Cointegration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue4:pp:271-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.