IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v37y2003i3p312-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure of the Transition Zone Behind Freeway Queues

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Muñoz

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Carlos F. Daganzo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

Observations of freeway traffic flow are usually quite scattered about an underlying curve when plotted versus density or occupancy. Although increasing the sampling intervals can reduce the scatter, whenever an experiment encompasses a rush hour with transitions in and out of congestion, some outlying data stubbornly remain beneath the “equilibrium” curve. The existence of these nonequilibrium points is a poorly understood phenomenon that appears to contradict the simple kinematic wave (KW) model of traffic flow. This paper provides a tentative explanation of the phenomenon, based on experimental evidence. The evidence was a FIFO queue that grew and receded over two detector stations, generating typical flow-density scatter plots at both locations. The locations were far from other interacting traffic streams. The data revealed that a transition zone where vehicles decelerated gradually existed immediately behind the queue. The transition zone was quite wide (about 1 km at both locations), moved slowly (approximately with the “shock” velocity of KW theory), and as a result spent many minutes over each detector station. Disequilibrium flow-density points arose only when the transition zone was over the detectors, suggesting that the transition zone explains their occurrence. The disequilibrium points drifted gradually from one branch of the curve to the other, as KW theory would have predicted if “shocks” had a characteristic width equal to the dimension of the transition zone. Nothing was found in the data to contradict this view. This paper also shows that in our case, if one neglects the shocks' physical dimension, the position of every vehicle can be predicted with KW theory to within approximately five vehicle spacings. Thus, it appears that KW theory can predict rather accurately traffic behavior at the back of FIFO queues, i.e., when the lanes are equally attractive to all drivers. We end with a discussion offering some perspective on how the findings of this paper related to the traffic thinking found in the current literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Muñoz & Carlos F. Daganzo, 2003. "Structure of the Transition Zone Behind Freeway Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 312-329, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:37:y:2003:i:3:p:312-329
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.37.3.312.16043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.37.3.312.16043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.37.3.312.16043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Lin, Wei-Hua & Del Castillo, Jose M., 1997. "A simple physical principle for the simulation of freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-125, April.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part II: Merges and the onset of congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 159-169, February.
    3. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part III: Multi-destination flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 305-313, August.
    4. Hurdle, V. F. & Son, Bongsoo, 2000. "Road test of a freeway model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 537-564, September.
    5. Coifman, Benjamin Andre, 1998. "Vehicle Reidentification and Travel Time Measurement Using Loop Detector Speed Traps," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5d69n86x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    7. Cassidy, Michael J., 1998. "Bivariate relations in nearly stationary highway traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 49-59, January.
    8. Windover, John R. & Cassidy, Michael J., 2001. "Some observed details of freeway traffic evolution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 881-894, December.
    9. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part I: Long homogeneous freeway sections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-158, February.
    10. Lin, Wei-Hua & Lo, Hong K., 2003. "A theoretical probe of a German experiment on stationary moving traffic jams," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 251-261, March.
    11. Cassidy, M. J. & Mauch, Michael, 2001. "An observed traffic pattern in long freeway queues," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 143-156, February.
    12. Newell, G. F., 1999. "Delays caused by a queue at a freeway exit ramp," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 337-350, June.
    13. Newell, G. F., 2002. "A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 195-205, March.
    14. Daganzo, C. F. & Cassidy, M. J. & Bertini, R. L., 1999. "Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 365-379, June.
    15. Robert, Tim & Lin, Wei-Hua & Cassidy, Michael, 1999. "Validation of the Incremental Transfer Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt48s3v44r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. G. F. Newell, 1961. "Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 209-229, April.
    17. Castillo, Jose M. del, 2001. "Propagation of perturbations in dense traffic flow: a model and its implications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 367-389, May.
    18. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1997. "A continuum theory of traffic dynamics for freeways with special lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 83-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Schönhof & Dirk Helbing, 2007. "Empirical Features of Congested Traffic States and Their Implications for Traffic Modeling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 135-166, May.
    2. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    3. Xianglun Mo & Xiaohong Jin & Jinpeng Tian & Zhushuai Shao & Gangqing Han, 2022. "Research on the Division Method of Signal Control Sub-Region Based on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Qian, Wei-Liang & F. Siqueira, Adriano & F. Machado, Romuel & Lin, Kai & Grant, Ted W., 2017. "Dynamical capacity drop in a nonlinear stochastic traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 328-339.
    5. Paul Nelson, 2006. "On Driver Anticipation, Two-Regime Flow, Fundamental Diagrams, and Kinematic-Wave Theory," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 165-178, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "A multi-commodity Lighthill–Whitham–Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 361-377.
    2. Qian, Wei-Liang & F. Siqueira, Adriano & F. Machado, Romuel & Lin, Kai & Grant, Ted W., 2017. "Dynamical capacity drop in a nonlinear stochastic traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 328-339.
    3. Laval, Jorge A., 2011. "Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 385-391, February.
    4. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    5. Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-32.
    6. Yeo, Hwasoo, 2008. "Asymmetric Microscopic Driving Behavior Theory," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1tn1m968, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Bai, Lu & Wong, S.C. & Xu, Pengpeng & Chow, Andy H.F. & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Calibration of stochastic link-based fundamental diagram with explicit consideration of speed heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 524-539.
    8. Jin, Wen-Long, 2018. "Unifiable multi-commodity kinematic wave model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 639-659.
    9. Jin, Wen-Long & Gan, Qi-Jian & Lebacque, Jean-Patrick, 2015. "A kinematic wave theory of capacity drop," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 316-329.
    10. Jin, Wen-Long & Zhang, H. Michael, 2013. "An instantaneous kinematic wave theory of diverging traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part I: Long homogeneous freeway sections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-158, February.
    12. Jabari, Saif Eddin & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "A probabilistic stationary speed–density relation based on Newell’s simplified car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 205-223.
    13. Wen-Long Jin, 2015. "Analysis of Kinematic Waves Arising in Diverging Traffic Flow Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 28-45, February.
    14. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "A kinematic wave theory of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1001-1021, September.
    15. Jin, Wen-Long, 2016. "On the equivalence between continuum and car-following models of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 543-559.
    16. Martin Schönhof & Dirk Helbing, 2007. "Empirical Features of Congested Traffic States and Their Implications for Traffic Modeling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 135-166, May.
    17. Jin, Wen-Long & Yan, Qinglong, 2019. "A formulation of unifiable multi-commodity kinematic wave model with relative speed ratios," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 236-253.
    18. Michael Z. F. Li, 2008. "A Generic Characterization of Equilibrium Speed-Flow Curves," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 220-235, May.
    19. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 483-505, July.
    20. Helbing, Dirk & Hennecke, Ansgar & Shvetsov, Vladimir & Treiber, Martin, 2001. "MASTER: macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-211, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:37:y:2003:i:3:p:312-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.