IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i3p606-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Sharing on Retail Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Zekun Liu

    (Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)

  • Dennis J. Zhang

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Fuqiang Zhang

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

Problem definition : This paper studies the information-sharing strategy for a retail platform on which multiple competing sellers distribute their products. Academic/practical relevance : Because of the rapid growth of retail platforms in recent years, information sharing has become an increasingly important issue because retail platforms can gather an enormous amount of consumer information that may not be visible to the sellers. Understanding how to share such information with those sellers will provide useful implications from both the theoretical and practical perspectives. Methodology : We develop a game-theoretic model where multiple sellers engage in Cournot competition on a retail platform by selling substitutable products, and the platform charges a commission fee for each transaction. The platform owns superior demand information and can control the accuracy level when sharing the information with the sellers. Results : We find that the platform has incentives to share the information, and such sharing is beneficial both to the platform and to all sellers. Under the asymmetric information-sharing format, the optimal strategy for the platform is to select a subgroup of sellers and truthfully share information with them. Under the symmetric sharing format, the platform must use the same accuracy level and the same set of information for all sellers, and thus has incentives to reduce the accuracy of the shared information. Moreover, we identify a simple pricing mechanism that can achieve the optimal information-sharing outcome. Managerial implications : This research highlights the importance of considering the impact of information sharing for a retail platform with competing sellers. It also proposes a simple, single-price mechanism to implement the optimal sharing strategy. These results could provide useful guidelines for platform managers to better design their information-sharing services.

Suggested Citation

  • Zekun Liu & Dennis J. Zhang & Fuqiang Zhang, 2021. "Information Sharing on Retail Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 606-619, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:3:p:606-619
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0915
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy W. Moe & Peter S. Fader, 2004. "Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 326-335, March.
    2. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    3. Dirk Bergemann & Stephen Morris, 2019. "Information Design: A Unified Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(1), pages 44-95, March.
    4. Esther Gal-or, 1986. "Information Transmission—Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 53(1), pages 85-92.
    5. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Higher Market Thickness Reduces Matching Rate in Online Platforms: Evidence from a Quasiexperiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 271-289, January.
    6. Christopher S. Tang & Yulan Wang & Ming Zhao, 2015. "The Implications of Utilizing Market Information and Adopting Agricultural Advice for Farmers in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1197-1215, August.
    7. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong & Hongtao Zhang, 2011. "Sharing Demand Information in Competing Supply Chains with Production Diseconomies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 566-581, March.
    8. Raith, Michael, 1996. "A General Model of Information Sharing in Oligopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 260-288, October.
    9. Benjamin Edelman & Michael Luca & Dan Svirsky, 2017. "Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Apostolos Filippas & John J. Horton & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2020. "Owning, Using, and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4152-4172, September.
    11. Alan L. Montgomery & Shibo Li & Kannan Srinivasan & John C. Liechty, 2004. "Modeling Online Browsing and Path Analysis Using Clickstream Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 579-595, November.
    12. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & James Agarwal, 2004. "Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 336-355, December.
    13. Lode Li, 1985. "Cournot Oligopoly with Information Sharing," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(4), pages 521-536, Winter.
    14. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2011. "The Price of Fairness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-31, February.
    15. Fuqiang Zhang, 2006. "Competition, Cooperation, and Information Sharing in a Two-Echelon Assembly System," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 273-291, March.
    16. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2012. "On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2234-2250, December.
    17. Vives, Xavier, 1984. "Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and bertrand," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 71-94, October.
    18. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    19. Ying-Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2015. "The Economic Value of Market Information for Farmers in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1441-1452, September.
    20. Baojun Jiang & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2011. "Firm Strategies in the "Mid Tail" of Platform-Based Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 757-775, September.
    21. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "Information Sharing in Oligopoly," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 329-343, March.
    22. Qiao†Chu He & Ying†Ju Chen & Zuo†Jun Shen, 2018. "On the Formation of Producers’ Information†Sharing Coalitions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(5), pages 917-927, May.
    23. Tingliang Huang & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2014. "Clickstream Data and Inventory Management: Model and Empirical Analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(3), pages 333-347, March.
    24. Gemma Berenguer & Pinar Keskinocak & J. George Shanthikumar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Luk Van Wassenhove & Chen-Nan Liao & Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "Farmers' Information Management in Developing Countries—A Highly Asymmetric Information Structure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(6), pages 1207-1220, June.
    25. Ruomeng Cui & Jun Li & Dennis J. Zhang, 2020. "Reducing Discrimination with Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1071-1094, March.
    26. Robert Jensen, 2007. "The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(3), pages 879-924.
    27. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    28. Terry A. Taylor, 2018. "On-Demand Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 704-720, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan, Mengli & Xing, Wei & Huang, Yi, 2023. "Joint forward contract negotiation: The role of B2B procurement platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Wu, Yaobin & Huang, Jiazhou & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2024. "The information value of logistics platforms in a freight matching market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 227-239.
    3. Li, Yongjian & Yao, Song & Wang, Jun, 2023. "Signaling strategies in a low-carbon supply chain with platform encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.
    5. Lihong Wei & Jiaping Xie & Weijun Zhu & Qinglin Li, 2023. "Pricing of platform service supply chain with dual credit: Can you have the cake and eat it?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 589-661, February.
    6. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Yang, Meng & Song, Qinyu, 2023. "Blessing or curse? Impact of incomplete information in a networked cournot competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Wu, Jie & Lu, Wei & Ji, Xiang, 2023. "The interactions between upstream quality disclosure and downstream entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 545-559.
    8. Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2023. "Gaining by ceding ‐ bounded wholesale pricing for information sharing in a supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 829-843, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junjie Zhou & Xiaoshuai Fan & Ying-Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Information Provision and Farmer Welfare in Developing Economies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 230-245, 1-2.
    2. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    3. Xing, Wei & Li, Qiankun & Zhao, Xuan & Li, Jialu, 2020. "Information sale and contract selection under downstream competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.
    5. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2015. "Competitive intelligence and disclosure," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(4), pages 709-729, October.
    6. Krishnan S. Anand & Manu Goyal, 2009. "Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 438-452, March.
    7. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Wei-Shiun Chang & Daniel A. Sanchez-Loor, 2020. "Downstream Information Leaking and Information Sharing Between Partially Informed Retailers," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 733-760, December.
    9. Shamir, Noam, 2012. "Strategic information sharing between competing retailers in a supply chain with endogenous wholesale price," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 352-365.
    10. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    11. Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Bin & Ma, Songxuan & Zhang, Xumei, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with information sharing: The informational advantage of GPOs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 785-802.
    12. Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2016. "Public Forecast Information Sharing in a Market with Competing Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2994-3022, October.
    13. Liang Guo & Ganesh Iyer, 2010. "Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 483-506, 05-06.
    14. Guangwen Kong & Sampath Rajagopalan & Hao Zhang, 2013. "Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 556-572, November.
    15. Haim Mendelson & Tunay I. Tunca, 2007. "Strategic Spot Trading in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 742-759, May.
    16. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.
    17. Kostas Bimpikis & Davide Crapis & Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi, 2019. "Information Sale and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2646-2664, June.
    18. Lode Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2008. "Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1467-1481, August.
    19. Wu, Jianghua & Zhai, Xin & Huang, Zhimin, 2008. "Incentives for information sharing in duopoly with capacity constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 963-975, December.
    20. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:3:p:606-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.