This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Cournot Oligopoly with Information Sharing

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Li, Lode.
Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/SSPapers/sswp561c.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences in its series Working Papers with number 561.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 1985
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published: Published in The Rand Journal of Economics, V. 16, #4 (1985):521-536.
Handle: RePEc:clt:sswopa:561

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Working Paper Assistant, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 228-77, Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125
Phone: 626 395-4065
Fax: 626 405-9841
Email:
Web page: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/ss

Order Information:
Postal: Working Paper Assistant, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 228-77, Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Victoria Mason).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Lowell Johnson, 1997. "The Incentive of Cournot Duopolists to Reveal Cost Information After Costs are Realized," Departmental Working Papers 199704, Rutgers University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  2. J. Andrés Faíña Medín & Jesús López Rodríguez & José López Rodríguez, 2003. "Information Exchanges in Cournot Duopolies," Revista Brasileira de Economia, Graduate School of Economics, Getulio Vargas Foundation (Brazil), vol. 57(1), April. [Downloadable!]
  3. Iván Major, 2006. "Why do (or do not) banks share customer information? A comparison of mature private credit markets and markets in transition," IEHAS Discussion Papers 0603, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, revised 24 Apr 2006. [Downloadable!]
  4. Enrico C. Perotti & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, 2001. "Outside Finance, Dominant Investors and Strategic Transparancy," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 01-019/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Eliane Catilina, 2002. "Information Acquisition in Cournot Markets: An (enhanced) two- Stage Approach," Game Theory and Information 0205005, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
  6. Jianbo Zhang & Zhentang Zhang, 1999. "Asymptotic Efficiency in Stackelberg Markets with Incomplete Information," CIG Working Papers FS IV 99-07, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG). [Downloadable!]
  7. Tunay I. Tunca, 2004. "Information Precision and Asymptotic Efficiency of Industrial Markets," Working Papers 04-11, NET Institute, revised Oct 2004. [Downloadable!]
  8. Hueth, Brent & Marcoul, Philippe, 2002. "Information Sharing and Oligopoly in Agricultural Markets: The Role of Bargaining Associations," Staff General Research Papers 10029, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
  9. Lagerlöf, Johan N.M., 2003. "Insisting on a Non-negative Price: Oligopoly, Uncertainty, Welfare and Multiple Equilibria," CEPR Discussion Papers 3901, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Enrico C. Perotti & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, . "Dominant Investors and Strategic Transparency," Working Papers 1999.24, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Andrew F. Daughety, 2006. "Cournot Competition," Working Papers 0620, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University. [Downloadable!]
  12. MortonI. Kamien, 1987. "The Value of Infommation in a Strategic Conflict," Discussion Papers 717, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
  13. Uday Bhanu Sinha, 2006. "On R&D Information Sharing and Merger," Working papers 145, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  14. Bipasa Datta, . "Experimentation, Information sharing and Oligopoly Limit Pricing," Discussion Papers 99/34, Department of Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
  15. Edward Schlee, 2008. "Expected consumer’s surplus as an approximate welfare measure," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 127-155, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  16. William Novshek & Lynda Thoman, 1997. "Capacity Choice and Duopoly Incentives for Information Sharing," CIG Working Papers FS IV 97-13, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG). [Downloadable!]
  17. Randal Reed, 1992. "An Analysis of Post-Product Development Market Research and its Effects on Firms and Consumers," Discussion Papers 996, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over 800 institutions contribute their bibliographic data directly to this service.

This page was last updated on 2008-10-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.