IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v30y2019i2p595-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Computational Strategies for Dynamic Inventory Liquidation

Author

Listed:
  • Mochen Yang

    (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405;)

  • Gediminas Adomavicius

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Alok Gupta

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

Abstract

We develop efficient computational strategies for the inventory liquidation problem, which is characterized by a retailer disposing of a fixed amount of inventory over a period of time. Liquidating end-of-cycle products optimally represents a challenging problem owing to its inherent stochasticity. The growing scale of liquidation problems further increases the need for solutions that are revenue- and time-efficient. We propose to address the inventory liquidation problem by deriving deterministic representations of stochastic demand, which provides significant theoretical and practical benefits as well as an intuitive understanding of the problem and the proposed solution. First, this paper develops a dynamic programming approach and a greedy heuristic approach to find the optimal liquidation strategy under deterministic demand representation. Importantly, we show that our heuristic approach is optimal under realistic conditions and is computationally less complex than dynamic programming. Second, we explore the relationships between liquidation revenue and several key elements of the liquidation problem via both computational experiments and theoretical analyses. We derive multiple managerial implications and demonstrate how the proposed heuristic approach can serve as an efficient decision support tool for inventory managers. Third, under stochastic demand, we conduct a comprehensive set of simulation experiments to benchmark the performance of our proposed heuristic approach with alternatives, including other simple approaches (e.g., the fixed-price strategy) as well as advanced stochastic approaches (e.g., stochastic dynamic programming). In particular, we consider a strategy that uses the proposed greedy heuristic to determine prices iteratively throughout the liquidation period. Computational experiments demonstrate that such iterative strategy stably produces higher total revenue than other alternatives and produces near-optimal total revenue in expectation while maintaining significant computational efficiency, compared with advanced techniques that solve the liquidation problem directly under stochastic demand. Our work advances the computational design for inventory liquidation and provides practical insights. The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0819 .

Suggested Citation

  • Mochen Yang & Gediminas Adomavicius & Alok Gupta, 2019. "Efficient Computational Strategies for Dynamic Inventory Liquidation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 595-615, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:595-615
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2018.0819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2018.0819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huseyin Topaloglu & Sumit Kunnumkal, 2006. "Approximate dynamic programming methods for an inventory allocation problem under uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 822-841, December.
    2. Vivek F. Farias & Benjamin Van Roy, 2010. "Dynamic Pricing with a Prior on Market Response," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 16-29, February.
    3. Guillermo Gallego & Garrett van Ryzin, 1994. "Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(8), pages 999-1020, August.
    4. Ravi Bapna & Paulo Goes & Alok Gupta, 2003. "Analysis and Design of Business-to-Consumer Online Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 85-101, January.
    5. Xuanming Su, 2007. "Intertemporal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 726-741, May.
    6. Gabriel Bitran & René Caldentey & Susana Mondschein, 1998. "Coordinating Clearance Markdown Sales of Seasonal Products in Retail Chains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 609-624, October.
    7. Gabriel R. Bitran & Susana V. Mondschein, 1997. "Periodic Pricing of Seasonal Products in Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 64-79, January.
    8. Jeffrey I. McGill & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 1999. "Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 233-256, May.
    9. Gabriel Bitran & René Caldentey, 2003. "An Overview of Pricing Models for Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 203-229, August.
    10. Yossi Aviv & Amit Pazgal, 2008. "Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence of Forward-Looking Consumers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 339-359, December.
    11. Victor F. Araman & René Caldentey, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing for Nonperishable Products with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1169-1188, October.
    12. Wen Zhao & Yu-Sheng Zheng, 2000. "Optimal Dynamic Pricing for Perishable Assets with Nonhomogeneous Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 375-388, March.
    13. D. P. de Farias & B. Van Roy, 2003. "The Linear Programming Approach to Approximate Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 850-865, December.
    14. Ravi Bapna & Paulo Goes & Alok Gupta, 2005. "Pricing and Allocation for Quality-Differentiated Online Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1141-1150, July.
    15. Stephen A. Smith & Dale D. Achabal, 1998. "Clearance Pricing and Inventory Policies for Retail Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 285-300, March.
    16. McAfee, R Preston & McMillan, John, 1987. "Auctions and Bidding," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 699-738, June.
    17. Wedad Elmaghraby & P{i}nar Keskinocak, 2003. "Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Inventory Considerations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1287-1309, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pourya Pourhejazy, 2020. "Destruction Decisions for Managing Excess Inventory in E-Commerce Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillermo Gallego & Michael Z. F. Li & Yan Liu, 2020. "Dynamic Nonlinear Pricing of Inventories over Finite Sales Horizons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 655-670, May.
    2. Yiwei Chen & Vivek F. Farias, 2013. "Simple Policies for Dynamic Pricing with Imperfect Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 612-624, June.
    3. Gonca P. Soysal & Lakshman Krishnamurthi, 2012. "Demand Dynamics in the Seasonal Goods Industry: An Empirical Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 293-316, March.
    4. Bernardo Bertoldi & Chiara Giachino & Alberto Pastore, 2016. "Strategic pricing management in the omnichannel era," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(4), pages 131-152.
    5. Ibrahim, Michael Nawar & Atiya, Amir F., 2016. "Analytical solutions to the dynamic pricing problem for time-normalized revenue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 632-643.
    6. Dasu, Sriram & Tong, Chunyang, 2010. "Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 662-671, August.
    7. Alderighi, Marco & Gaggero, Alberto A. & Piga, Claudio A., 2022. "Hidden prices with fixed inventory: Evidence from the airline industry," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 42-61.
    8. Netessine, Serguei, 2006. "Dynamic pricing of inventory/capacity with infrequent price changes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 553-580, October.
    9. Kyle Y. Lin, 2004. "A sequential dynamic pricing model and its applications," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 501-521, June.
    10. Hongmin Li & Woonghee Tim Huh, 2012. "Optimal pricing for a short life‐cycle product when customer price‐sensitivity varies over time," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(7), pages 552-576, October.
    11. Wen Chen & Adam J. Fleischhacker & Michael N. Katehakis, 2015. "Dynamic pricing in a dual‐market environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 531-549, October.
    12. Wedad Elmaghraby & P{i}nar Keskinocak, 2003. "Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Inventory Considerations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1287-1309, October.
    13. Namin, Aidin & Soysal, Gonca P. & Ratchford, Brian T., 2022. "Alleviating demand uncertainty for seasonal goods: An analysis of attribute-based markdown policy for fashion retailers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 671-681.
    14. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Zhongjun Tian, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control of Substitute Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 317-339, December.
    15. Nathan C. Craig & Ananth Raman, 2016. "Improving Store Liquidation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 89-103, February.
    16. Pavithra Harsha & Shivaram Subramanian & Joline Uichanco, 2019. "Dynamic Pricing of Omnichannel Inventories," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 47-65, January.
    17. Yossi Aviv & Mike Mingcheng Wei & Fuqiang Zhang, 2019. "Responsive Pricing of Fashion Products: The Effects of Demand Learning and Strategic Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2982-3000, July.
    18. Negin Golrezaei & Hamid Nazerzadeh & Ramandeep Randhawa, 2020. "Dynamic Pricing for Heterogeneous Time-Sensitive Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 562-581, May.
    19. Chia-Wei Kuo & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Göker Aydın, 2011. "Dynamic Pricing of Limited Inventories When Customers Negotiate," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 882-897, August.
    20. Shanshan Hu & Xing Hu & Qing Ye, 2017. "Optimal Rebate Strategies Under Dynamic Pricing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1546-1561, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:595-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.