IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iez/survey/ces-v23_1-2021_hladika-gulin-bernat.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revaluation as a Model of Subsequent Measurement of Property, Plant, and Equipment – Case of Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjana Hladika

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Danimir Gulin

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ivana Bernat

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Accounting standards allow the application of two models for subsequent measurement of property, plant, and equipment, and those are the cost model and the revaluation model. The application of a certain model depends on the manager’s choice of accounting policy. The main goal of this paper is to investigate the application of the revaluation model for subsequent measurement of property, plant, and equipment in Croatian companies. Further goals are to examine how the fair value for revalued assets is determined, and what the level is of disclosed information about the determined fair value and the revaluation. The theoretical part of the paper analyzes different models for measurement of property, plant, and equipment, the issue of determining fair value, and disclosure requirements according to national and international accounting standards. The empirical part of the paper is conducted on 500 large and medium-sized Croatian companies from the service (utilities), production, and tourism sectors. Particular attention is placed on the notes to the financial statements of these companies. The research covers the period from 2014 to 2018. Collected data are analyzed by using descriptive statistics methods, point-biserial correlation, and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjana Hladika & Danimir Gulin & Ivana Bernat, 2021. "Revaluation as a Model of Subsequent Measurement of Property, Plant, and Equipment – Case of Croatia," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 23(1), pages 63-95, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:iez:survey:ces-v23_1-2021_hladika-gulin-bernat
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/375714
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aboody, David & Barth, Mary E. & Kasznik, Ron, 1999. "Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 149-178, January.
    2. Ray Ball, 2006. "International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(S1), pages 5-27.
    3. Neil Fargher & John Ziyang Zhang, 2014. "Changes in the measurement of fair value: Implications for accounting earnings," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 184-199, September.
    4. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    5. Benzion Barlev & Dov Fried & Joshua Rene Haddad & Joshua Livnat, 2007. "Reevaluation of Revaluations: A Cross‐Country Examination of the Motives and Effects on Future Performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1025-1050, September.
    6. Lopes, Patricia Teixeira & Rodrigues, Lucia Lima, 2007. "Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 25-56.
    7. Benzion Barlev & Dov Fried & Joshua Rene Haddad & Joshua Livnat, 2007. "Reevaluation of Revaluations: A Cross-Country Examination of the Motives and Effects on Future Performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7-8), pages 1025-1050.
    8. Fargher, Neil & Zhang, John Ziyang, 2014. "Changes in the measurement of fair value: Implications for accounting earnings," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 184-199.
    9. Christian Laux, 2012. "Financial instruments, financial reporting, and financial stability," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 239-260, August.
    10. Vera Palea, 2014. "Fair value accounting and its usefulness to financial statement users," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 102-116, September.
    11. Lopes, Alexsandro Broedel & Walker, Martin, 2012. "Asset revaluations, future firm performance and firm-level corporate governance arrangements: New evidence from Brazil," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 53-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Tahidur Rahman & Syed Zabid Hossain & Md. Anwarul Haque, 2021. "Timing, Recurrence, and Effects of Fixed Asset Revaluation: Evidence from Bangladesh," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 67-75.
    2. Johannes Thesing & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Do fair value measurements affect accounting-based earnings quality? A literature review with a focus on corporate governance as moderator," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(7), pages 965-1004, September.
    3. Jincheol Bae & Jaehong Lee & Eunsoo Kim, 2019. "Does Fixed Asset Revaluation Build Trust between Management and Investors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2015. "Value-Relevance of Biological Assets under IFRS," FEP Working Papers 556, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    5. Habeeb Mohamed Nijam, 2018. "Motives for Reporting Fixed Assets at Revalued Amount: Evidence from a Developing Economy," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3), pages 604-622, June.
    6. Salvatore Madonna & Greta Cestari & Francesca Giuliani, 2021. "Asset revaluation: scelte manageriali in tempo di crisi," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 41-64.
    7. Ryan McDonough & Argyro Panaretou & Catherine Shakespeare, 2020. "Fair value accounting: Current practice and perspectives for future research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 303-332, March.
    8. Yosr Hrichi & Feten Arfaoui, 2023. "Research and development capitalization, fair value, and earnings management: A study of French listed companies," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 569-586, September.
    9. Olante, Maria Elena & Lassini, Ugo, 2022. "Investment property: Fair value or cost model? Recent evidence from the application of IAS 40 in Europe," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Lopes, Alexsandro Broedel & Walker, Martin, 2012. "Asset revaluations, future firm performance and firm-level corporate governance arrangements: New evidence from Brazil," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 53-67.
    11. Fábio Moraes da Costa & Carol Liu & Gina Cavalier Rosa & Samuel L. Tiras, 2020. "The Commitment to Income‐Decreasing Accounting Choices As a Credible Signal to Reducing Information Asymmetry: The Case of Asset Revaluations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2501-2522, December.
    12. Lin Liao & Helen Kang & Richard D. Morris, 2021. "The value relevance of fair value and historical cost measurements during the financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2069-2107, April.
    13. Liao, Lin & Yao, Daifei (Troy) & Kang, Helen & Morris, Richard D., 2020. "The impact of legal efficacy on value relevance of the three-level fair value measurement hierarchy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Gomez Biscarri, Javier & Lopez Espinosa, German, 2008. "The influence of differences in accounting standards on empirical pricing models: An application to the Fama-French model," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 369-388, October.
    15. Abdullah, Azrul Bin, 2018. "Company-specific characteristics and the choice of hedge accounting for derivatives reporting: Malaysian case," SocArXiv npa6v, Center for Open Science.
    16. Nicholas Pawsey & Lin Crase, 2013. "The Mystique of Water Pricing and Accounting," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 328-339, September.
    17. Manel Jmal Derbel & Mohamed Ali Boujelbene, 2015. "La Conformite Comptabilite-Fiscalite Et La Gestion Des Resultats : Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188533, HAL.
    18. Maigoshi, Zaharaddeen Salisu & Latif, Rohaida Abdul & Kamardin, Hasnah, 2018. "Change in value-relevance of disclosed RPT across accounting regimes: Evidence from Malaysia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 422-433.
    19. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    20. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    revaluation; fair value; property; plant; and equipment; accounting standards; financial reporting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iez:survey:ces-v23_1-2021_hladika-gulin-bernat. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Doris Banicevic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eizgghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.