IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v15y2022i3p90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Energy Efficiency on Firm Productivity in Kenya’s Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Kigundu Macharia
  • Dianah Ngui
  • John Kamau Gathiaka

Abstract

There is concern about probable energy efficiency and economic performance trade-off, particularly in developing countries which often require more energy consumption to spur their economies. This study assesses the relation between energy efficiency and total factor productivity in Kenya’s manufacturing sector by applying a sample of firms in the World Bank Enterprise Survey. Energy intensity is used as a proxy for energy efficiency while total factor productivity is estimated using the Levinsohn-Petrin Algorithm. A dynamic panel data model is applied in the analysis of the energy efficiency and total factor productivity relationship which is at the sub-sector and firm size levels. The sub-sectors of concern are- chemicals, pharmaceuticals and plastics, food, textile and garments and paper and other manufacturing sub-sectors. Firm sizes of interest are- small, medium and large. The findings show heterogeneity in energy intensity across sub-sectors. Total factor productivity is also found to be heterogeneous across sub-sectors and firms of different sizes. The estimates show that in general, energy efficiency significantly promotes total factor productivity. Other factors that promote total factor productivity include capital intensity, age, size, top manager’s years of experience, foreign ownership and exporting status. However, the effect of these variables varies across the sub-sectors and firm sizes. The study findings suggest that policies to improve energy efficiency should be accorded additional emphasis jointly with improvements in total factor productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Kigundu Macharia & Dianah Ngui & John Kamau Gathiaka, 2022. "Effects of Energy Efficiency on Firm Productivity in Kenya’s Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-90, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/0/0/46987/50250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/46987
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan De Loecker, 2011. "Product Differentiation, Multiproduct Firms, and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1407-1451, September.
    2. Caragliu, Andrea, 2021. "Energy efficiency-enhancing policies and firm performance: Evidence from the paper and glass industries in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. James R. Tybout, 2000. "Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 11-44, March.
    4. Rath, Badri Narayan, 2018. "Productivity growth and efficiency change: Comparing manufacturing- and service-based firms in India," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 447-457.
    5. Coad, Alex & Segarra, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2013. "Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 173-189.
    6. Worrell, Ernst & Laitner, John A & Ruth, Michael & Finman, Hodayah, 2003. "Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1081-1098.
    7. Ilke Van Beveren, 2012. "Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 98-128, February.
    8. Adrian R Pagan & Anthony D Hall, 1983. "Diagnostic tests as residual analysis," Published Paper Series 1983-1, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    9. Santosh Kumar Sahu & Krishnan Narayanan, 2011. "Total Factor Productivity and Energy Intensity in Indian Manufacturing: A Cross-Sectional Study," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 1(2), pages 47-58, September.
    10. Cantore, Nicola & Calì, Massimiliano & Velde, Dirk Willem te, 2016. "Does energy efficiency improve technological change and economic growth in developing countries?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 279-285.
    11. Celani de Macedo, Alessandra & Cantore, Nicola & Barbier, Laura & Matteini, Marco & Pasqualetto, Giorgia, 2020. "The Impact of Industrial Energy Efficiency on Economic and Social Indicators," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 305185, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    12. Subrahmanya, M.H. Bala, 2006. "Energy intensity and economic performance in small scale bricks and foundry clusters in India: does energy intensity matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 489-497, March.
    13. Proskuryakova, L. & Kovalev, A., 2015. "Measuring energy efficiency: Is energy intensity a good evidence base?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 450-459.
    14. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yonghan Jeon & Jongoh Nam, 2023. "Estimating Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving Potential in the Republic of Korea’s Offshore Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arboleda, Xavier & Bermúdez-Barrezueta, Natalia & Camino-Mogro, Segundo, 2022. "Production and enterprise profitability in Ecuador’s crop-growing sector," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    2. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera & Francesco Trivieri & Jeffrey B. Nugent & Mariarosaria Agostino, 2011. "Firm Productivity, Organizational Choice and Global Value Chain," Working Papers 2011R09, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    3. Tran, Hien Thu, 2019. "Institutional quality and market selection in the transition to market economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    4. Dobbelaere, Sabien & Kiyota, Kozo & Mairesse, Jacques, 2015. "Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies: Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 290-322.
    5. Ji Yong Lee & Allen Featherstone & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Doo Bong Han, 2019. "The Long-Run and Short-Run Effects of Ethanol Production on U.S. Beef Producers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Montalbano, P. & Nenci, S., 2019. "Energy efficiency, productivity and exporting: Firm-level evidence in Latin America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 97-110.
    7. Prabal De & Priya Nagaraj, 2014. "Productivity and firm size in India," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 891-907, April.
    8. Xi CHEN, 2012. "Estimation of the CES Production Function with Biased Technical Change: A Control Function Approach," Working Papers of BETA 2012-20, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Thanapol Srithanpong, 2016. "Firm Productivity in Thai Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data," PIER Discussion Papers 15, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Thanapol Srithanpong, 2016. "Firm Productivity in Thai Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data," PIER Discussion Papers 15., Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Jan 2016.
    11. Massimo G. Colombo & Samuele Murtinu, 2017. "Venture Capital Investments in Europe and Portfolio Firms' Economic Performance: Independent Versus Corporate Investors," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 35-66, February.
    12. Mary Amiti & Jozef Konings, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1611-1638, December.
    13. Amit Gandhi & Salvador Navarro & David Rivers, 2011. "On the Identification of Production Functions: How Heterogeneous is Productivity?," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20119, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
    14. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    15. Nicholas Bloom & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2012. "Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 167-201, February.
    16. Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 295-335, June.
    17. Sabien Dobbelaere & Jacques Mairesse, 2010. "Comparing Micro-evidence on Rent Sharing from Three Different Approaches," NBER Working Papers 16220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Mertens, Matthias & Mueller, Steffen, 2022. "The East-West German gap in revenue productivity:Just a tale of output prices?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 815-831.
    19. Natalie Chun & Soohyung Lee, 2015. "Bonus compensation and productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing plant-level data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-58, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.