IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gei/journl/v4y2017i2p146-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Shehnaz Tehseen, T. Ramayah, Sulaiman Sajilan

    (Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business School, 50300, Malaysia)

Abstract

Several studies have debated over the prevalence of Common Method Variance (CMV) in organizational research. This paper highlights various procedural and statistical remedies to assess and control common method variance in any organizational study. It has been recognized that Common Method Variance (CMV) may significantly influence the research findings if it is not controlled properly through procedural and statistical remedies. However, researchers usually do not use all procedural remedies to remove potential impacts of CMV. Therefore, statistical remedies are strongly suggested to control and remove effects of CMV from data analysis. We have mentioned some common and effective statistical remedies from existing literature that have been widely used and recommended to control the effects of CMV. Moreover, we also discuss the challenge of CMV in relation to entrepreneurship studies and illustrate the problem utilizing an analysis of entrepreneurial competencies and business growth. In addition, we describe the possible solutions for minimizing the impact of common method bias by using the combination of several methods. This study strongly recommends using both procedural and statistical remedies to test and control the impacts of CMV from the research study.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehnaz Tehseen, T. Ramayah, Sulaiman Sajilan, 2017. "Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 4(2), pages 146-175, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gei:journl:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:146-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://geistscience.com/JMS/Issue2-17/Article4/JMS1704202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    2. Anonymous, 2015. "Notes from the Editors," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(3), pages 1-1, August.
    3. John Antonakis & Samuel Bendahan & Philippe Jacquart & Rafael Lalive, 2010. "On making causal claims : A review and recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313119, HAL.
    4. Yüksel, Atila, 2017. "A critique of “Response Bias” in the tourism, travel and hospitality research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 376-384.
    5. Anonymous, 2015. "Notes from the Editors," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(2), pages 1-1, May.
    6. Robert W. Palmatier, 2016. "Improving publishing success at JAMS: contribution and positioning," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 655-659, November.
    7. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    8. Anonymous, 2015. "Notes from the Editors," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(1), pages 1-1, February.
    9. Anonymous, 2015. "Notes from the Editors," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(4), pages 1-1, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Thiele, Kai O. & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2016. "Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3998-4010.
    2. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    3. Rigdon, Edward E., 2016. "Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 598-605.
    4. Roland Helm & Martin Kloyer & Christin Aust, 2018. "R&D Collaboration Between Firms: Hard And Soft Antecedents Of Supplier Knowledge Sharing," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-42, December.
    5. Sullivan, Joe H. & Warkentin, Merrill & Wallace, Linda, 2021. "So many ways for assessing outliers: What really works and does it matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 530-543.
    6. Ferraris, Alberto & Degbey, William Y. & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Bresciani, Stefano & Castellano, Sylvaine & Fiano, Fabio & Couturier, Jerome, 2022. "Microfoundations of Strategic Agility in Emerging Markets: Empirical Evidence of Italian MNEs in India," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    7. Kim Hoe Looi, 2020. "Contextual Motivations for Undergraduates’ Entrepreneurial Intentions in Emerging Asian Economies," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(1), pages 53-87, March.
    8. Suciu Mihai-Alexandru & Gaskó Noémi & Lung Rodica Ioana, 2017. "Approximation of Nash equilibria and the network community structure detection problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Rameshwar Dubey & Nezih Altay & Constantin Blome, 2019. "Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 159-177, December.
    10. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    11. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    12. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    13. Nikunj Kumar Jain & Abinash Panda & Piyush Choudhary, 2020. "Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: The role of environmental management system and organizational flexibility in oil and gas sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3509-3525, December.
    14. Yong Liu, 2019. "Residents’ Willingness and Influencing Factors on Action Personal Carbon Trading: A Case Study of Metropolitan Areas in Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Miia Bask & Mikael Bask, 2015. "Cumulative (Dis)Advantage and the Matthew Effect in Life-Course Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Nullmeier, Fabian & Wynstra, Finn & van der Valk, Wendy, 2019. "Mitigating shirking: Contracting performance in buyer-initiated service triads," Other publications TiSEM cebcb590-5a85-4906-b8ec-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Roubaud, David & Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Giannakis, Mihalis & Foropon, Cyril, 2019. "Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 120-136.
    18. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    19. Tai-Yin Chiu & Hui-Ju K Chiang & Ruei-Yang Huang & Jie-Hong R Jiang & François Fages, 2015. "Synthesizing Configurable Biochemical Implementation of Linear Systems from Their Transfer Function Specifications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Fournier, Pierre-Luc & Chênevert, Denis & Jobin, Marie-Hélène, 2021. "The antecedents of physicians’ behavioral support for lean in healthcare: The mediating role of commitment to organizational change," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gei:journl:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:146-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imtiaz ARIF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://geistscience.com/JMS/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.