IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1695-d112901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Participation in the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Hong Kong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bonnie K. L. Mak

    (Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Lewis T. O. Cheung

    (Department of Social Sciences, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Dennis L. H. Hui

    (Department of Social Sciences, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Examining the extent to which a community plays a role in the decision-making process in tourism planning can provide a better understanding of how tourism can benefit a community. Arnstein’s ladder of citizen participation (ALCP) has been adopted by tourism scholars to understand both the nature of the participation expected of the community and the community’s actual participation in tourism development. However, the literature on tourism development and community involvement is underdeveloped in the context of urban tourism, and few studies have attempted to identify the differences between the expected and actual participation of local residents. Identifying this gap reveals the reasons behind it and generates possible suggestions and solutions. The level of community participation of Tai O residents has been assessed by employing Arnstein’s framework. The results indicated the difference between the level of local residents’ expected and actual participation in tourism development. The reasons for the difference are identified, and suggestions for improvement are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonnie K. L. Mak & Lewis T. O. Cheung & Dennis L. H. Hui, 2017. "Community Participation in the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Hong Kong, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1695-:d:112901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G J Syme & D K Macpherson & C Seligman, 1991. "Factors Motivating Community Participation in Regional Water-Allocation Planning: A Test of an Expectancy-Value Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(12), pages 1779-1795, December.
    2. Nunkoo, Robin, 2015. "Tourism development and trust in local government," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 623-634.
    3. Shuwen Liu & Irene Cheng & Lewis Cheung, 2017. "The Roles of Formal and Informal Institutions in Small Tourism Business Development in Rural Areas of South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Wang, Hui & Yang, Zhaoping & Chen, Li & Yang, Jingjing & Li, Rui, 2010. "Minority community participation in tourism: A case of Kanas Tuva villages in Xinjiang, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 759-764.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José María Martín Martín & José Antonio Rodriguez Martín & Karla Aída Zermeño Mejía & José Antonio Salinas Fernández, 2018. "Effects of Vacation Rental Websites on the Concentration of Tourists—Potential Environmental Impacts. An Application to the Balearic Islands in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Lin, Dan & Simmons, David, 2017. "Structured inter-network collaboration: Public participation in tourism planning in Southern China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 315-328.
    4. José María Martín Martín & Jose Antonio Salinas Fernández & José Antonio Rodríguez Martín & Juan De Dios Jiménez Aguilera, 2017. "Assessment of the Tourism’s Potential as a Sustainable Development Instrument in Terms of Annual Stability: Application to Spanish Rural Destinations in Process of Consolidation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Xiumei Xu & Chao Feng & Yongshan Du & Qimeng Wang & Gaige Zhang & Yicheng Huang, 2022. "Evaluating the sustainability of a tourism system based on emergy accounting and emergetic ternary diagrams: a case study of the Xinjiang Kanas tourism area," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6731-6787, May.
    6. Despina Sdrali & Maria Goussia-Rizou & Pinelopi Kiourtidou, 2015. "Residents’ perception of tourism development as a vital step for participatory tourism plan: a research in a Greek protected area," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 923-939, August.
    7. Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño & Joan B. Garau-Vadell & Ricardo J. Díaz-Armas, 2019. "The Influence of Knowledge on Residents’ Perceptions of the Impacts of Overtourism in P2P Accommodation Rental," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Nanping Feng & Fenfen Wei & Kevin H. Zhang & Dongxiao Gu, 2018. "Innovating Rural Tourism Targeting Poverty Alleviation through a Multi-Industries Integration Network: the Case of Zhuanshui Village, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Jean-Luc Pradel Mathurin Augustin & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2018. "Technology and Government Effort, A Two-headed Animal within the Competitiveness Index of the Travel and Tourism Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 144-159, September.
    10. Lidija Lalicic & Irem Önder, 2018. "Residents’ Involvement in Urban Tourism Planning: Opportunities from a Smart City Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Antonio Ariza-Montes & Antonio Sianes & Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez & Carmen López-Martín & Mercedes Ruíz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia, 2021. "Social Return on Investment (SROI) to Assess the Impacts of Tourism: A Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    12. Chapman, Alexis & Dilmperi, Athina, 2022. "Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 902-921.
    13. Marshall, Graham R., 2004. "Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3-4), pages 271-286, December.
    14. Zuo, Bing & Gursoy, Dogan & Wall, Geoffrey, 2017. "Residents’ support for red tourism in China: The moderating effect of central government," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-63.
    15. Czernek, Katarzyna & Czakon, Wojciech, 2016. "Trust-building processes in tourist coopetition: The case of a Polish region," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 380-394.
    16. Bambang Sutikno & Abdul Hakim & Jati Batoro & Harsuko Riniwati, 2018. "Influence of Green Economic Development through Local Wisdom, Economic Potential, and Role of Dairy Cooperative in Pasuruan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 81-89.
    17. Chau-kiu Cheung & Xiaodong Yue, 2023. "National Experiences and Trust in China’s National Government Among Hong Kong Chinese Youth," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 99-117, August.
    18. Jiancheng Lu & Xiaolong Luo & Peigang Zhang, 2019. "Rights–Values–Interests: The Conflict between World Cultural Heritage and Community: A Case Study of the West Lake Cultural Landscape Heritage in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Nataliia Letunovska & Aleksy Kwilinski & Henryk Dzwigol & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2021. "Sustainable Tourism for the Green Economy," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 4(4), pages 33-51, December.
    20. Francesca Pagliara & Massimo Aria & Lucia Russo & Valentina Della Corte, 2021. "A theoretical model linking the development of the transportation system with citizens' trust in government actors," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 273-285, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1695-:d:112901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.