IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p246-d65265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Environmental Performance Evaluation of Thailand’s Food Industry Using Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Anirut Pipatprapa

    (Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No.1 Hseuh-Fu Road, Nei-Fu, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hsiang-Hsi Huang

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No.1 Hseuh-Fu Road, Nei-Fu, Pingtung 912, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Hsu Huang

    (Department of Hotel and Restaurant Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No.1 Hseuh-Fu Road, Nei-Fu, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Currently, the environment and sustainability are important topics for every industry. The food industry is particularly complicated in this regard because of the dynamic and complex character of food products and their production. This study uses structural equation modeling (SEM) and a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to investigate which factors are suitable for evaluating the environmental performance of Thailand’s food industry. A first-stage questionnaire survey was conducted with 178 managers in the food industry that obtained a certificate from the Department of Industrial Work of Thailand to synthesize the performance measurement model and the significance of the relationship between the indicators. A second-stage questionnaire measured 18 experts’ priorities regarding the criteria and sub-factors involved in the different aspects and assessment items regarding environmental performance. SEM showed that quality management, market orientation, and innovation capability have a significantly positive effect on environmental performance. The FAHP showed that the experts were most concerned about quality management, followed by market orientation and innovation capability; the assessment items for quality policy, quality assurance, and customer orientation were of the most concern. The findings of this study can be referenced and support managerial decision making when monitoring environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Anirut Pipatprapa & Hsiang-Hsi Huang & Ching-Hsu Huang, 2016. "A Novel Environmental Performance Evaluation of Thailand’s Food Industry Using Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:246-:d:65265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko, 2013. "Facilitating innovation capability through performance measurement," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 991-1010, September.
    2. Menikpura, S.N.M. & Sang-Arun, Janya & Bengtsson, Magnus, 2016. "Assessment of environmental and economic performance of Waste-to-Energy facilities in Thai cities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 576-584.
    3. Yang, Ma Ga (Mark) & Hong, Paul & Modi, Sachin B., 2011. "Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 251-261, February.
    4. Yu-Cheng Tang & Thomas W. Lin, 2011. "Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to the lead-free equipment selection decision," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 35-56.
    5. Wiengarten, Frank & Pagell, Mark, 2012. "The importance of quality management for the success of environmental management initiatives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 407-415.
    6. Malik, M.M. & Abdallah, S. & Hussain, M., 2016. "Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1313-1321.
    7. Lee, Ki-Hoon & Min, Byung & Yook, Keun-Hyo, 2015. "The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    9. Neuteleers, Stijn & Engelen, Bart, 2015. "Talking money: How market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 253-260.
    10. Chiou, Tzu-Yun & Chan, Hing Kai & Lettice, Fiona & Chung, Sai Ho, 2011. "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 822-836.
    11. Chithambaranathan, P. & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Palaniappan, PL.K., 2015. "Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 163-176.
    12. Rimpeekool, Wimalin & Seubsman, Sam-ang & Banwell, Cathy & Kirk, Martyn & Yiengprugsawan, Vasoontara & Sleigh, Adrian, 2015. "Food and nutrition labelling in Thailand: a long march from subsistence producers to international traders," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 59-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toly Chen, 2016. "Competitive and Sustainable Manufacturing in the Age of Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Barbara Aquilani & Cecilia Silvestri & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2016. "Sustainability, TQM and Value Co-Creation Processes: The Role of Critical Success Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2021. "Small agricultural businesses' performance—What is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1898-1912, May.
    4. Letizia Tebaldi & Barbara Bigliardi & Eleonora Bottani, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain and Innovation: A Review of the Recent Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Lin Li & Fangfang Fan & Li Ma & Ziran Tang, 2016. "Energy Utilization Evaluation of Carbon Performance in Public Projects by FAHP and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Andrea Gallo & Riccardo Accorsi & Giulia Baruffaldi & Riccardo Manzini, 2017. "Designing Sustainable Cold Chains for Long-Range Food Distribution: Energy-Effective Corridors on the Silk Road Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Yan Fang & Yiping Jiang & Lijun Sun & Xingxing Han, 2018. "Design of Green Cold Chain Networks for Imported Fresh Agri-Products in Belt and Road Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anirut Pipatprapa & Hsiang‐Hsi Huang & Ching‐Hsu Huang, 2017. "The Role of Quality Management & Innovativeness on Green Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 249-260, May.
    2. Ammar Masood & Mohsin Altaf & Mohsin Raza Khan & Tanveer Illahi & Abdul Qayyum, 2021. "Industrial Environmental Performance: Mapping And Systematic Literature Review," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(4), pages 76-100, December.
    3. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    5. Ramon B. Narcizo & Alberto G. Canen & Iara Tammela, 2017. "A conceptual framework to represent the theoretical domain of “innovation capability” in organizations," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 147-166.
    6. Dai, Rui & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2017. "Green process innovation and differentiated pricing strategies with environmental concerns of South-North markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 132-150.
    7. Chaiyawit Muangmee & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Nusanee Meekaewkunchorn & Nuttapon Kassakorn & Bilal Khalid, 2021. "Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Jinxia Jiao & ChenGuang Liu & Yan Xu & Zirong Hao, 2022. "Effects of strategic flexibility and organizational slack on the relationship between green operational practices adoption and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 561-577, May.
    9. Tze San Ong & Ah Suat Lee & Boon Heng Teh & Hussain Bakhsh Magsi, 2019. "Environmental Innovation, Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Environmental Proactive Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    12. Ying Ye & Kwok Hung Lau, 2022. "Competitive Green Supply Chain Transformation with Dynamic Capabilities—An Exploratory Case Study of Chinese Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Beske, Philip & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 131-143.
    14. Minh Hue Nguyen & Anh Chi Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2018. "Contribution of Quality Management Practices to Sustainability Performance of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, January.
    15. Khan, Mehmood & Ajmal, Mian M. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & AlMarzouqi, Abdulla H. & AlNuaimi, Bader Khamis, 2021. "Measures of greenness: An empirical study in service supply chains in the UAE," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Mohamed Hamdoun & Mahmoud Zouaoui, 2017. "Impact of Environmental Management on Competitive Advantage of Tunisian Companies: The Mediator Role of Organizational Culture," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 76-82.
    17. Dai, Jing & Cantor, David E. & Montabon, Frank L., 2017. "Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 272-280.
    18. El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2019. "Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 483-498.
    19. Yan Zhou & Xin-Tong Lin & Zhi-Ping Fan & Kar-Hung Wong, 2022. "Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-42, June.
    20. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:246-:d:65265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.