IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i2p160-d63664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Objective Input–Output Linear Model for Water Supply, Economic Growth and Environmental Planning in Resource-Based Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlan Ke

    (School of Humanities and Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jinghua Sha

    (School of Humanities and Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jingjing Yan

    (School of Humanities and Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guofeng Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100083, China
    Institute of Economic and Trade, Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Rongrong Wu

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Yango College, Fuzhou 350015, China)

Abstract

Water resource and environment capacity have become two of the most important restrictions for sustainable development in resource-based cities whose leading industries are the exploitation and processing of resources. Taking Ordos in China as an example, this article constructs an integrated model combining a multi-objective optimization model with input–output analysis to achieve the tradeoffs between economic growth, water utilization and environmental protection. This dynamic model includes socioeconomic, water supply–demand, water quality control, air quality control, energy consumption control and integrated policy sub-models. These six sub-models interact with each other. After simulation, this article proposes efficient solutions on industrial restructuring by maximizing the Gross Regional Product of Ordos from 394.3 in 2012 to 785.1 billion RMB in 2025 with a growth rate of 6.4% annually; and presents a water supply plan by maximizing the proportion of reclaimed water from 2% to 6.3% through sewage treatment technology selection and introduction, and effective water allocation. Meanwhile, the environmental impacts are all in line with the planning targets. This study illustrates that the integrated modeling is generic and can be applied to any region suffering uncoordinated development issues and can serve as a pre-evaluation approach for conducting early warning research to offer suggestions for government decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlan Ke & Jinghua Sha & Jingjing Yan & Guofeng Zhang & Rongrong Wu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Input–Output Linear Model for Water Supply, Economic Growth and Environmental Planning in Resource-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:160-:d:63664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javier Paredes-Arquiola & Joaquín Andreu-Álvarez & Miguel Martín-Monerris & Abel Solera, 2010. "Water Quantity and Quality Models Applied to the Jucar River Basin, Spain," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(11), pages 2759-2779, September.
    2. Lee, Kwang-Soo, 1982. "A Generalized Input-Output Model of an Economy with Environmental Protection," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 64(3), pages 466-473, August.
    3. Cortés-Borda, D. & Ruiz-Hernández, A. & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. & Llop, M. & Guimerà, R. & Sales-Pardo, M., 2015. "Identifying strategies for mitigating the global warming impact of the EU-25 economy using a multi-objective input–output approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 21-30.
    4. Q. Tan & G. Huang & Y. Cai, 2013. "Multi-Source Multi-Sector Sustainable Water Supply Under Multiple Uncertainties: An Inexact Fuzzy-Stochastic Quadratic Programming Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 451-473, January.
    5. Hristu-Varsakelis, D. & Karagianni, S. & Pempetzoglou, M. & Sfetsos, A., 2010. "Optimizing production with energy and GHG emission constraints in Greece: An input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1566-1577, March.
    6. Perrings,Charles, 1987. "Economy and Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521340816.
    7. Leontief, Wassily, 1977. "The future of the world economy+," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 171-182.
    8. Wouter Buytaert & Jan Friesen & Jens Liebe & Ralf Ludwig, 2012. "Assessment and Management of Water Resources in Developing, Semi-arid and Arid Regions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(4), pages 841-844, March.
    9. C. Oliveira & D. Coelho & C. H. Antunes, 2016. "Coupling input–output analysis with multiobjective linear programming models for the study of economy–energy–environment–social (E3S) trade-offs: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 471-502, December.
    10. Forsund, Finn R., 1985. "Input-output models, national economic models, and the environment," Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, in: A. V. Kneese† & J. L. Sweeney (ed.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 325-341, Elsevier.
    11. Jingjing Yan & Jinghua Sha & Xiao Chu & Feng Xu & Yoshiro Higano, 2014. "Endogenous derivation of optimal environmental policies for proper treatment of stockbreeding wastes in the upstream region of the Miyun Reservoir, Beijing," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 477-500, June.
    12. Leontief, Wassily, 1970. "Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(3), pages 262-271, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinkui Wang & Zengchuan Dong & Wei Xu & Yun Luo & Tao Zhou & Wenzhuo Wang, 2019. "Study on Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Coordinated Development Degree among Regional Water Resources, Social Economy, and Ecological Environment Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Zhang, Qian & Shen, Juqin & Sun, Fuhua, 2021. "Spatiotemporal differentiation of coupling coordination degree between economic development and water environment and its influencing factors using GWR in China's province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 462(C).
    3. Willem K. M. Brauers, 2018. "Location Theory and Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Application of the MOORA Method," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(3), September.
    4. Liu, Er-na & Wang, Yanan & Chen, Wei & Chen, Wenjun & Ning, Siyin, 2021. "Evaluating the transformation of China's resource-based cities: An integrated sequential weight and TOPSIS approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingjing Yan & Jinghua Sha & Xiao Chu & Feng Xu & Nan Xiang, 2014. "Dynamic Evaluation of Water Quality Improvement Based on Effective Utilization of Stockbreeding Biomass Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Guerra, Ana-Isabel & Sancho, Ferran, 2018. "Positive and normative analysis of the output opportunity costs of GHG emissions reductions: A comparison of the six largest EU economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 45-62.
    3. Haixiao Huang, Walter C. Labys, 2002. "Environment and trade: a review of issues and methods," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 100-160.
    4. Singh, Vivek Kumar & Henriques, Carla Oliveira & Martins, António Gomes, 2018. "Fostering investment on energy efficient appliances in India–A multi-perspective economic input-output lifecycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1022-1035.
    5. Tarancon, Miguel Angel & Del Río, Pablo, 2012. "Assessing energy-related CO2 emissions with sensitivity analysis and input-output techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 161-170.
    6. Jingjing Yan & Feng Xu & Takeshi Mizunoya & Huanzheng Du & Yoshiro Higano, 2011. "Endogenous Derivation of Optimal Environmental Policies for Proper Treatment of Stockbreeding Wastes in the Upstream Region of Miyun Reservoir, Beijing," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1375, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Boglioni, Michele & Zambelli, Stefano, 2018. "Specialization patterns and reduction of CO2 emissions. An empirical investigation of environmental preservation and economic efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-149.
    8. Yoann Verger, 2015. "Sraffa and ecological economics: review of the literature," Working Papers hal-01182894, HAL.
    9. Stern, David I., 1997. "Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: A neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 197-215, June.
    10. Robert Ayres, 1995. "Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 207-230, October.
    11. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    12. repec:lrk:lrkwkp:fiirs006 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Simonis, Udo E., 1990. "Beyond growth: elements of sustainable development," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 112255, July.
    14. Stanislav Edward Shmelev (ODID), "undated". "Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis of the UK Economy: Key Sector Analysis," QEH Working Papers qehwps183, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    15. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2011. "Análise de Insumo-Produto: Teoria e Fundamentos [Input-Output Analysis: Theory and Foundations]," MPRA Paper 32566, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Wei Yang & Junnian Song & Yoshiro Higano & Jie Tang, 2015. "An Integrated Simulation Model for Dynamically Exploring the Optimal Solution to Mitigating Water Scarcity and Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Pieter J.H. van Beukering & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & Marco A. Janssen & Harmen Verbruggen, 2000. "International Material-Product Chains: An Alternative Perspective on International Trade and Trade Theories," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-034/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Jingjing Yan & Jinghua Sha & Xiao Chu & Feng Xu & Yoshiro Higano, 2014. "Endogenous derivation of optimal environmental policies for proper treatment of stockbreeding wastes in the upstream region of the Miyun Reservoir, Beijing," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 477-500, June.
    19. de Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto, 2016. "Economic-energy-environment analysis of prospective sugarcane bioethanol production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 514-526.
    20. Court, Christa D., 2012. "Enhancing U.S. hazardous waste accounting through economic modeling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 79-89.
    21. Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes de & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto & Henriques, Carla Oliveira, 2015. "A hybrid input–output multi-objective model to assess economic–energy–environment trade-offs in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 769-785.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:160-:d:63664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.