IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3275-d1375649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biotechnological Approach of Technological Advancements for Sustainable Probiotic Bread Production

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Pejcz

    (Department of Biotechnology and Food Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

The pursuit of probiotic-enriched bread, driven by the dual objectives of enhancing nutritional value and promoting health while ensuring sustainability, has spurred significant research and technological advancements. However, a persistent challenge lies in preserving the viability of microorganisms throughout the rigorous processes of production, storage, and exposure to the stomach’s acidic environment. This study investigates biotechnological innovations for sustainable probiotic bread production, conducting a thorough review of probiotic encapsulation methods and analyzing prior research on the viability of encapsulated probiotics in bread across different baking conditions and storage periods. Encapsulation emerges as a promising strategy, involving the protection of microorganisms with specialized layers, notably multilayered alginate-chitosan coatings, to shield them from degradation. Studies suggest that encapsulated probiotics, particularly the L. casei 431 strain within smaller-sized products subjected to shorter baking times, exhibit minimal viability reduction. Moreover, incorporating microcapsules into the dough, rather than post-baking surface application, further mitigates bacterial losses during storage. Despite these advancements, further investigations are necessary to identify strains resilient to processing, storage, and consumption while prioritizing sensory attributes to meet consumer preferences. Ultimately, research in probiotic bread production aims for a sustainable approach, placing significant emphasis on health considerations and disease prevention. Implementing encapsulation technology aligns with consumer demands for healthy, environmentally friendly products, highlighting the urgent need for innovation in this field with a focus on sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Pejcz, 2024. "Biotechnological Approach of Technological Advancements for Sustainable Probiotic Bread Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3275-:d:1375649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreyeva, T. & Long, M.W. & Brownell, K.D., 2010. "The impact of food prices on consumption: A systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(2), pages 216-222.
    2. Anna Zawistowska-Rojek & Tomasz Zaręba & Stefan Tyski, 2022. "Microbiological Testing of Probiotic Preparations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David O. Yawson & Barry J. Mulholland & Tom Ball & Michael O. Adu & Sushil Mohan & Philip J. White, 2017. "Effect of Climate and Agricultural Land Use Changes on UK Feed Barley Production and Food Security to the 2050s," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Jakina Debnam, 2017. "Selection Effects and Heterogeneous Demand Responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax Vote," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1172-1187.
    3. Yizhao Jiang, 2022. "The Influence of Payment Method: Do Consumers Pay More with Mobile Payment?," Papers 2210.14631, arXiv.org.
    4. Zhang, Yinjunjie & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Revisiting the Effects of Sugar Tax on Demand Elasticities - Evidence from the BLP Demand Model," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273978, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Härkänen, Tommi & Kotakorpi, Kaisa & Pietinen, Pirjo & Pirttilä, Jukka & Reinivuo, Heli & Suoniemi, Ilpo, 2014. "The welfare effects of health-based food tax policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 196-206.
    6. Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1557-1626.
    7. Liu, Yizao & Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Zhu, Chen, 2014. "The Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 53-68, April.
    8. Cosnard, Lionel & Laborde, David, 2019. "Taxing Sugar and Sugary Products to Reduce Obesity: A CGE Assessment of Several Tax Policies," Conference papers 333067, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Alasdair Gardiner, 2016. "Implications of a Sugar Tax in New Zealand: Incidence and Effectiveness," Treasury Working Paper Series 16/09, New Zealand Treasury.
    10. Bahel, Eric & Marrouch, Walid & Gaudet, Gérard, 2013. "The economics of oil, biofuel and food commodities," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 599-617.
    11. An, Ruopeng, 2015. "Nationwide expansion of a financial incentive program on fruit and vegetable purchases among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A cost-effectiveness analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 80-88.
    12. van den Bijgaart, I.M., 2017. "Too slow a change? Deep habits, consumption shifts and transitory tax," Working Papers in Economics 701, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    13. Snir, Avichai & (Allan) Chen, Haipeng & Levy, Daniel, 2022. "Zero-ending prices, cognitive convenience, and price rigidity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 519-542.
    14. repec:ags:aaea13:150977 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gouel, Christophe & Laborde, David, 2021. "The crucial role of domestic and international market-mediated adaptation to climate change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Bastian, Christopher T. & Devadoss, Stephen, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Tobacco Addiction," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304425, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Zhen Miao & John C. Beghin & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Accounting For Product Substitution In The Analysis Of Food Taxes Targeting Obesity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(11), pages 1318-1343, November.
    18. Germán Forero-Cantor & Javier Ribal & Neus Sanjuán, 2020. "Measuring regional differences in food security from access and stability dimensions: A methodological proposal based on elasticities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(3), pages 112-119.
    19. Lin, Biing-Hwan & Dong, Diansheng & Carlson, Andrea & Rahkovsky, Ilya, 2017. "Potential dietary outcomes of changing relative prices of healthy and less healthy foods: The case of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 77-88.
    20. Mendez, Samara & Peacock, Jacob & The Humane League Labs, 2021. "Exploring the impact of plant-based milk alternatives in the US," OSF Preprints tdghp, Center for Open Science.
    21. Lal Almas & Mehreen Zaid Ullah & Hina Fatima & Lal K. Almas & Mallory K. Vesta & Nasim Akhter, 2017. "Estimating Demand Elasticities for Aggregate Food Groups using QUAIDS and Pooled HIES Data," EcoMod2017 10541, EcoMod.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3275-:d:1375649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.