IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i1p407-d1312207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equity and Efficiency: An Examination of Indonesia’s Energy Subsidy Policy and Pathways to Inclusive Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Ruddy Kaharudin Gobel

    (School of Strategic and Global Studies, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Bambang Shergi Laksmono

    (Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Martani Huseini

    (Faculty of Administrative Sciences, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Mia Siscawati

    (School of Strategic and Global Studies, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Indonesian Government’s substantial investment in energy subsidies, designed to assist poor and vulnerable households, ironically favors the wealthy and exacerbates inequality. This study delves into household-based energy subsidy policies in Indonesia, focusing on their effects on gender and social inclusiveness. By combining qualitative document analysis with micro-level data analysis—typically reserved for social protection programs—and national socioeconomic data, this study reveals significant access gaps to energy subsidies. The findings indicate that the existing policy benefits affluent households, leaving marginalized groups such as female-headed households, individuals with disabilities, and the elderly from low-income families without access to subsidies. This gap stems from the current price-based subsidy approach and the unequal distribution of energy services. The study recommends a fundamental shift from commodity-based subsidy policy to direct household subsidies, removing barriers to access and encouraging more equitable, gender-responsive, and inclusive policies. The benefits of these reforms can optimize subsidy budget allocation, increase targeting accuracy, and encourage pro-poor measures. In addition, this can spur the development of local alternative energy, thereby contributing to a just energy transition in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruddy Kaharudin Gobel & Bambang Shergi Laksmono & Martani Huseini & Mia Siscawati, 2024. "Equity and Efficiency: An Examination of Indonesia’s Energy Subsidy Policy and Pathways to Inclusive Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:407-:d:1312207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burke, Paul J. & Kurniawati, Sandra, 2018. "Electricity subsidy reform in Indonesia: Demand-side effects on electricity use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 410-421.
    2. Zhang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Yunpeng & Zhao, Mingcheng & Muttarak, Raya & Feng, Yanchao, 2023. "What is the global causality among renewable energy consumption, financial development, and public health? New perspective of mineral energy substitution," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Khalid, Syed Adnan & Salman, Verda, 2020. "“Welfare impact of electricity subsidy reforms in Pakistan: A micro model study”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Vagliasindi, Maria, 2012. "Implementing energy subsidy reforms : an overview of the key issues," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6122, The World Bank.
    5. Choudhuri, Pallavi & Desai, Sonalde, 2020. "Gender inequalities and household fuel choice in India," MPRA Paper 110340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Hasan & Odmaa Narantungalag, & Martin Berka, 2022. "The intended and unintended consequences of large electricity subsidies: evidence from Mongolia," Discussion Papers 2202, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    2. Proskuryakova, Liliana & Starodubtseva, Alena & Bianco, Vincenzo, 2020. "Modelling a household tariff for reducing sectoral cross-subsidies in the Russian power market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Boudekhdekh, Karim, 2022. "A comparative analysis of energy subsidy in the MENA region," MPRA Paper 115275, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Rentschler, Jun, 2016. "Incidence and impact: The regional variation of poverty effects due to fossil fuel subsidy reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 491-503.
    5. Ma, Wanglin & Vatsa, Puneet & Zheng, Hongyun, 2022. "Cooking fuel choices and subjective well-being in rural China: Implications for a complete energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Valentina Alvarez-Saavedra & Pierre Levasseur & Suneha Seetahul, 2022. "The role of gender inequality in the obesity epidemic: A case study from India," Working Papers hal-03744694, HAL.
    7. Li, Jiajia & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Spiritual support or living support: Which alleviates solid fuel use for rural households in ethnical minority regions of China?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 479-491.
    8. Robin Burgess & Michael Greenstone & Nicholas Ryan & Anant Sudarshan, 2020. "The Consequences of Treating Electricity as a Right," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 145-169, Winter.
    9. Valentina Alvarez-Saavedra à & Pierre Levasseur & Suneha Seetahul, 2023. "The Role of Gender Inequality in the Obesity Epidemic: A Case Study from India," Post-Print hal-04051768, HAL.
    10. Stephane Hallegatte & Mook Bangalore & Laura Bonzanigo & Marianne Fay & Tamaro Kane & Ulf Narloch & Julie Rozenberg & David Treguer & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2016. "Shock Waves," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22787, December.
    11. Muhammad Atta-ul-Islam Abrar & Muhsin Ali & Uzma Bashir & Karim Khan, 2019. "Energy Pricing Policies and Consumers’ Welfare: Evidence from Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, Jan-June.
    12. Li, Yumin & Jiang, Yan & Dong, Changgui, 2023. "Electricity cross-subsidies in China: Social equity, reverse Ramsey pricing, and welfare analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 403-417.
    13. Jan, Muhammad Zain & Ullah, Kafait & Abbas, Faisal & Khalid, Hassan Abdullah & Bajwa, Tariq M., 2023. "Barriers to the adoption of social welfare measures in the electricity tariff structure of developing countries: A case of Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Yao, 2020. "Analyzing the elasticity and subsidy to reform the residential electricity tariffs in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 189-206.
    15. Nikos Sakkas & Sofia Yfanti & Costas Daskalakis & Eduard Barbu & Marharyta Domnich, 2021. "Interpretable Forecasting of Energy Demand in the Residential Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Grainger, Corbett & Schreiber, Andrew & Zhang, Fan, 2019. "Distributional impacts of energy-heat cross-subsidization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 65-81.
    17. Xu, Shang & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "The welfare impacts of removing coal subsidies in rural China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Anan Wattanakuljarus, 2021. "Diverse effects of fossil fuel subsidy reform on industrial competitiveness in Thailand," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 489-517, September.
    19. Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Liu, Yu & Marchán, Estefanía & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2018. "Managing the distributional effects of energy taxes and subsidy removal in Latin America and the Caribbean," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 424-436.
    20. Best, Rohan & Burke, Paul J., 2022. "Effects of renting on household energy expenditure: Evidence from Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:407-:d:1312207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.