IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3361-d1066063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Its Spatiotemporal Differentiation in China, Considering Green Water Consumption and Carbon Emissions Based on Undesired Dynamic SBM-DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Yunfei Feng

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yi Zhang

    (Runshi Think Tank Industrial Innovation (Hebei) Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China)

  • Zhaodan Wu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Quanliang Ye

    (Department of Planning, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Xinchun Cao

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Both agricultural output and environmental pollution in China show certain characteristics of spatiotemporal variation due to the evolution and inter-provincial disparities of resource endowment, economic development level, and production mode. This paper considered the green water consumption, carbon emissions in agricultural production, and the persistent role of fixed asset investment, constructed an undesired dynamic SBM-DEA model, and evaluated the agricultural eco-efficiency (AEE) of 31 provinces in China from 2007 to 2018, analyzing the spatiotemporal differentiation. The results show that, during 2007–2018, the following can be concluded: (1) The AEE of 31 provinces in China showed the characteristics of an overall stable rise from 0.64 to 0.70 but uneven development among regions from 2007 to 2018. (2) The averages of either the agricultural resource consumption efficiency index or pollution emission efficiency index in 31 provinces slightly increased over time, while the average value of the agricultural fixed asset investment efficiency index showed a decline in volatility. The spatial discrepancy of any index mainly stems from the index disparity between groups with a high AEE and groups with a low one, with contribution rates of more than 85%. (3) It is recommended to emphasize strengthening communication and cooperation between provinces with high and low AEE and implement distinct regional strategies to improve AEE.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunfei Feng & Yi Zhang & Zhaodan Wu & Quanliang Ye & Xinchun Cao, 2023. "Evaluation of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Its Spatiotemporal Differentiation in China, Considering Green Water Consumption and Carbon Emissions Based on Undesired Dynamic SBM-DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3361-:d:1066063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yansui & Zou, Lilin & Wang, Yongsheng, 2020. "Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Changming Cheng & Jieqiong Li & Yuqing Qiu & Chunfeng Gao & Qiang Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Alongside China’s Carbon Neutrality Targets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Eva Richterová & Martin Richter & Zlata Sojková, 2021. "Regional eco-efficiency of the agricultural sector in V4 regions, its dynamics in time and decomposition on the technological and pure technical eco-efficiency change," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(3), pages 553-576, September.
    4. Rui Shu & Xinchun Cao & Mengyang Wu, 2021. "Clarifying Regional Water Scarcity in Agriculture based on the Theory of Blue, Green and Grey Water Footprints," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 1101-1118, February.
    5. Mengyang Hou & Zenglei Xi & Suyan Zhao, 2022. "Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Aihua Long & Pei Zhang & Yang Hai & Xiaoya Deng & Junfeng Li & Jie Wang, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Variations of Crop Water Footprint and Its Influencing Factors in Xinjiang, China during 1988–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. María Pérez Urdiales & Alfons Oude Lansink & Alan Wall, 2016. "Eco-efficiency Among Dairy Farmers: The Importance of Socio-economic Characteristics and Farmer Attitudes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(4), pages 559-574, August.
    8. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 145-156, June.
    9. Ibrahim Zeghaiton Chaloob & Razamin Ramli & Mohd Kamal Mohd Nawawi, 2018. "Measuring economic and environmental efficiency for agricultural zones in Iraq using data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 235-248.
    10. Marlena Gołaś & Piotr Sulewski & Adam Wąs & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2020. "On the Way to Sustainable Agriculture—Eco-Efficiency of Polish Commercial Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Cao, Xinchun & Zeng, Wen & Wu, Mengyang & Guo, Xiangping & Wang, Weiguang, 2020. "Hybrid analytical framework for regional agricultural water resource utilization and efficiency evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changhong Chen & Huijie Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Green Development Level of Mianyang Agriculture, Based on the Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Zhengyu Zhang & Gui Jin, 2024. "Measurement of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors: Insights from 44 Agricultural Counties in Liaoning Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinchun Cao & Jianfeng Xiao & Mengyang Wu & Wen Zeng & Xuan Huang, 2021. "Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Driving Force Assessment to Improve Regional Productivity and Effectiveness," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2519-2535, June.
    2. Guofeng Wang & Rui Shi & Lingchen Mi & Jinmiao Hu, 2022. "Agricultural Eco-Efficiency: Challenges and Progress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Cao, Xinchun & Bao, Yutong & Li, Yueyao & Li, Jianni & Wu, Mengyang, 2023. "Unravelling the effects of crop blue, green and grey virtual water flows on regional agricultural water footprint and scarcity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    4. Changming Cheng & Jieqiong Li & Yuqing Qiu & Chunfeng Gao & Qiang Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Alongside China’s Carbon Neutrality Targets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Ying Liu & Lei Tian & Zhiyi Wang & Peiyong He & Meng Li & Na Wang & Yang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Interprovincial Ecological Efficiency and Its Determinants in China: A Super-Efficiency SBM Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    7. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Mohammad Nourani & Qian Long Kweh & Evelyn Shyamala Devadason & V.G.R. Chandran, 2020. "A decomposition analysis of managerial efficiency for the insurance companies: A data envelopment analysis approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 885-901, September.
    9. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    10. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    11. Qiting Zuo & Yixuan Diao & Lingang Hao & Chunhui Han, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Human-Water Harmony Relationship in Countries Along the “Belt and Road”," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4019-4035, October.
    12. Bao-Ngoc Tong & Cheng-Ping Cheng & Lien-Wen Liang & Yi-Jun Liu, 2023. "Using Network DEA to Explore the Effect of Mobile Payment on Taiwanese Bank Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Patricija Bajec, 2022. "A Hybrid DEA Approach for the Upgrade of an Existing Bike-Sharing System with Electric Bikes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Hatzizisis, L. & Dotas, V. & Zagorakis, K. & Gourdouvelis, D. & Dotas, D., 2019. "Technical Efficiency Measurement in Broiler Chicken Production System: A Case Study in Epirus, Greece," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 1).
    15. Yung‐ho Chiu & Tai‐Yu Lin & Tzu‐Han Chang & Yi‐Nuo Lin & Shih‐Yung Chiu, 2021. "Prevaluating efficiency gains from potential mergers and acquisitions in the financial industry with the Resample Past–Present–Future data envelopment analysis approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 369-384, March.
    16. Qian Wang & Zhuoya Du & Boyu Wang & Yung‐ho Chiu & Tzu‐Han Chang, 2022. "Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment attractiveness: Evidence from China provinces," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 899-917, May.
    17. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    19. Chen, Kuan-Chen & Lin, Sun-Yuan & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2022. "Exploring the efficiency of hospital and pharmacy utilizations in Taiwan: An application of dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Zhijiang Li & Decai Tang & Mang Han & Brandon J. Bethel, 2018. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3361-:d:1066063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.