IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13117-d1230003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Process-Improvement Efforts for Supply Chain Operations under Disruptions: New Structural Results

Author

Listed:
  • Emre Berk

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
    CRSSCA-Centre for Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Analytics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Onurcan Ayas

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye)

  • M. Ali Ülkü

    (CRSSCA-Centre for Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Analytics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
    Department of Management Science & Information Systems, Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

Abstract

Rampant disruptions have probed the fragility of supply chains: Renewed perspectives and comprehensive operational models are needed to enhance resiliency and sustainability in business. This paper proposes a new inventory management model that explicitly integrates process improvement efforts to improve supply chain sustainability through the better use of capital (materials, assets, and technology) and labor (workforce and know-how). Under a desired service-level constraint, we study reducing setup (fixed) costs when they are expressed in terms of economic production functions of two (input) decision variables: the level of capital (e.g., process change, and technology investments) and the level of labor required. This research is motivated by lean manufacturing practices, which rely on shaping the operating environment and operating optimally within that business environment. Based on mathematical modeling and analysis, we provide closed-form optimality expressions and structural results that lend themselves to decision insights. In particular, we provide, along with illustrative numerical examples, results on the sensitivity of setup-reduction efforts to demand rates, variability, and explicit expressions for determining the required labor and capital resources. A generalization of the model for carbon emissions is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Emre Berk & Onurcan Ayas & M. Ali Ülkü, 2023. "Optimizing Process-Improvement Efforts for Supply Chain Operations under Disruptions: New Structural Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13117-:d:1230003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Shouyang, 2011. "Managing carbon footprints in inventory management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 178-185, August.
    2. Shadbegian, Ronald J. & Gray, Wayne B., 2005. "Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity: A production function approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 196-208, August.
    3. Hatirli, Selim Adem & Ozkan, Burhan & Fert, Cemal, 2006. "Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 427-438.
    4. John Haldi & David Whitcomb, 1967. "Economies of Scale in Industrial Plants," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 373-373.
    5. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang & Evan T. Willenson, 2023. "Research opportunities in preparing supply chains of essential goods for future pandemics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(8), pages 2416-2431, April.
    6. Yuan, Chaoqing & Liu, Sifeng & Wu, Junlong, 2009. "Research on energy-saving effect of technological progress based on Cobb-Douglas production function," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2842-2846, August.
    7. Nasri, F & Paknejad, MJ, 1992. "Flexibility improvement in continuous-review (s, Q) systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 408-410, May.
    8. George Li & S. Rajagopalan, 1998. "Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1517-1532, November.
    9. Wenli Xiao & Cheryl Gaimon & Ravi Subramanian & Markus Biehl, 2019. "Investment in Environmental Process Improvement," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(2), pages 407-420, February.
    10. Maher A. N. Agi & Sohrab Faramarzi-Oghani & Öncü Hazır, 2021. "Game theory-based models in green supply chain management: a review of the literature," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(15), pages 4736-4755, August.
    11. Fariba Goodarzian & Peiman Ghasemi & Angappa Gunasekaren & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Ajith Abraham, 2022. "A sustainable-resilience healthcare network for handling COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 761-825, May.
    12. Nakamura, Shinichiro, 1990. "A Nonhomothetic Generalized Leontief Cost Function Based on Pooled Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(4), pages 649-656, November.
    13. Kogan, Konstantin & Tapiero, Charles S., 2009. "Optimal co-investment in supply chain infrastructure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 265-276, January.
    14. Wei, Taoyuan, 2007. "Impact of energy efficiency gains on output and energy use with Cobb-Douglas production function," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2023-2030, April.
    15. Evan L. Porteus, 1985. "Investing in Reduced Setups in the EOQ Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(8), pages 998-1010, August.
    16. Shin, Seungjae & Eksioglu, Burak, 2015. "An empirical study of RFID productivity in the U.S. retail supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 89-96.
    17. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kian, Ramez & Gürler, Ülkü & Berk, Emre, 2014. "The dynamic lot-sizing problem with convex economic production costs and setups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 361-379.
    2. Voros, Jozsef, 2002. "Product balancing under conditions of quality inflation, cost pressures and growth strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 153-166, August.
    3. Vörös, József, 2003. "A minőség figyelembevételének szükségessége az egyensúlyi állapot meghatározásában [The need to consider quality when determining a state of equilibrium]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 6-21.
    4. Paulson Gjerde, Kathy A. & Slotnick, Susan A., 2004. "Quality and reputation: The effects of external and internal factors over time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Pilar I. Vidal-Carreras & Jose P. Garcia-Sabater & Julio J. Garcia-Sabater, 2017. "A practical model for managing inventories with unknown costs and a budget constraint," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 118-129, January.
    6. Hofmann, Christian, 1998. "Investments in modern production technology and the cash flow-oriented EPQ-model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 193-206, January.
    7. Margarita Genius & Spiro Stefanou & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2009. "Productivity Growth and Efficiency under Leontief Technology: An Application to US Steam-Electric Power Generation Utilities," Working Papers 0913, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    8. Genius, Margarita & Stefanou, Spiro E. & Tzouvelekas, Vangelis, 2012. "Measuring productivity growth under factor non-substitution: An application to US steam-electric power generation utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 844-852.
    9. Xue, Jian & Guo, Na & Zhao, Laijun & Zhu, Di & Ji, Xiaoqin, 2020. "A cooperative inter-provincial model for energy conservation based on futures trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Voros, Jozsef, 1999. "Lot sizing with quality improvement and setup time reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 568-574, March.
    11. Suárez, Freddy F. & Cusumano, Michael A., 1954- & Fine, Charles H., 1991. "Flexibility and performance : a literature critique and strategic framework," Working papers 3298-91., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Coates, Eyler Robert, 1997. "Manufacturing setup cost reduction under variable lead times and finite opportunities for investment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 237-247, May.
    13. Dey, Oshmita & Chakraborty, Debjani, 2011. "A fuzzy random continuous review inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 101-106, July.
    14. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2003. "Lot sizing with learning and forgetting in set-ups and in product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 95-111, January.
    15. H. Dharma Kwon, 2010. "Invest or Exit? Optimal Decisions in the Face of a Declining Profit Stream," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 638-649, June.
    16. Fehmi Tanrısever & S. Sinan Erzurumlu & Nitin Joglekar, 2012. "Production, Process Investment, and the Survival of Debt‐Financed Startup Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 637-652, July.
    17. Liu, Xingchu & Cetinkaya, Sila, 2007. "A note on "quality improvement and setup reduction in the joint economic lot size model"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 194-204, October.
    18. Li, Xiang, 2020. "Reducing channel costs by investing in smart supply chain technologies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Wakhid Ahmad Jauhari & I Nyoman Pujawan & Mokh Suef, 2023. "Sustainable inventory management with hybrid production system and investment to reduce defects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 543-572, May.
    20. Freimer, Michael & Thomas, Douglas & Tyworth, John, 2006. "The value of setup cost reduction and process improvement for the economic production quantity model with defects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 241-251, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13117-:d:1230003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.