IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11297-d1198367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Prediction Method for Renewable Energy Investments Abroad Based on Cloud-DBN

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjiao Zai

    (College of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Yuying He

    (College of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Huazhang Wang

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China)

Abstract

There are many specific risks in renewable energy (RE) investment projects, and the incidences of these risk factors are fuzzy and uncertain. In different stages of a project’s life cycle, the main risk factors frequently change. Therefore, this paper constructed a cloud dynamic Bayesian network model (Cloud-DBN) for RE operation processes; it uses the DBN graph theory to show the generation mechanism and evolution process of RE outbound investment risks, to make the risk prediction structure clear. Based on the statistical data of observation nodes, the probability of risk occurrence is deduced to ensure the scientific nature of the reasoning process. The probability of risk being low, medium, or high is given, which is highly consistent with the uncertainty and randomness of risk. An improved formula for quantitative data normalization is proposed, and an improved calculation method for joint conditional probability based on weight and contribution probability is proposed, which reduces the workload of determining numerous joint conditional probabilities and improves the practicability of the BN network with multiple parent nodes. According to the 20-year historical statistical data of observation nodes, the GM(1,1) algorithm was used to extract the transfer characteristics of observation nodes, construct the DBN network, and deduce the annual risk probability of each risk node during the operation period of the RE project. The method was applied to the wind power project invested by China in Pakistan, and the effectiveness of the method was tested. The method in this paper provides a basis for investment decisions in the RE project planning period and provides targeted risk reduction measures for the project’s operation period.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjiao Zai & Yuying He & Huazhang Wang, 2023. "Risk Prediction Method for Renewable Energy Investments Abroad Based on Cloud-DBN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11297-:d:1198367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Freitas, Renan Alves & Vogel, Ederson Paulo & Korzenowski, André Luis & Oliveira Rocha, Luiz Alberto, 2020. "Stochastic model to aid decision making on investments in renewable energy generation: Portfolio diffusion and investor risk aversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1161-1176.
    2. Egli, Florian, 2020. "Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Almona Tani & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2020. "Policy Implications for the Clean Energy Transition: The Case of the Boston Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Ji, Shaoyu & Song, Zixin, 2020. "Renewable energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative: An ANP-cloud model method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    6. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2018. "Barriers to investment in utility-scale variable renewable electricity (VRE) generation projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 730-744.
    7. Zhou, Pengfei & Luo, Jie & Cheng, Fei & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Guangxu Li & Gang Kou & Yanhong Li & Yi Peng, 2022. "A group decision making approach for supplier selection with multi-period fuzzy information and opinion interaction among decision makers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(4), pages 855-868, March.
    9. Bekaert, Geert & Harvey, Campbell R. & Lundblad, Christian T. & Siegel, Stephan, 2016. "Political risk and international valuation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-23.
    10. Rami Al-Hajj & Ali Assi & Bilel Neji & Raymond Ghandour & Zaher Al Barakeh, 2023. "Transfer Learning for Renewable Energy Systems: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Espinoza, R. David & Rojo, Javier, 2015. "Using DNPV for valuing investments in the energy sector: A solar project case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 44-49.
    12. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Ju, Yanbing & Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini & Le, Hoang Phong, 2021. "Renewable energy investment risk assessment in belt and road initiative countries under uncertainty conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Alimohammadlou, Moslem, 2022. "Investigating risks in renewable energy in oil-producing countries through multi-criteria decision-making methods based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1009-1027.
    2. Abba, Z.Y.I. & Balta-Ozkan, N. & Hart, P., 2022. "A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Mosquera-López, Stephania & Uribe, Jorge M., 2022. "Pricing the risk due to weather conditions in small variable renewable energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    5. Job Taminiau & John Byrne & Jongkyu Kim & Min‐Hwi Kim & Jeongseok Seo, 2022. "Inferential‐ and measurement‐based methods to estimate rooftop “solar city” potential in megacity Seoul, South Korea," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), September.
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Li, Minyang, 2022. "Understanding the investment of renewable energy firms in the face of economic policy uncertainty – Micro-evidence from listed companies in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Izanloo, Milad & Aslani, Alireza & Zahedi, Rahim, 2022. "Development of a Machine learning assessment method for renewable energy investment decision making," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    8. Yana Duan & Yang Sun & Yu Zhang & Xiaoqi Fan & Qinghuan Dong & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Investment in China Employing a Hybrid Novel MCDM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Huang, Youxing & Yang, Yu, 2023. "Determinants of Chinese energy OFDI location decisions and entry failure risk: The roles of public diplomacy endeavors and firm investment strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Rafael Bambirra & Lais Schiavo & Marina Lima & Giovanna Miranda & Iolanda Reis & Michael Cassemiro & Antônio Andrade & Fernanda Laender & Rafael Silva & Douglas Vieira & Petr Ekel, 2023. "Robust Multiobjective Decision Making in the Acquisition of Energy Assets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Bega, François & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "China's belt & road initiative energy cooperation: International assessment of the power projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Ben-Salha, Ousama & Mokni, Khaled, 2022. "Detrended cross-correlation analysis in quantiles between oil price and the US stock market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. M, Jisma & Mohan, Vivek & Thomas, Mini Shaji & Madhu M, Nimal, 2022. "Risk-Calibrated conventional-renewable generation mix using master-slave portfolio approach guided by flexible investor preferencing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    14. Chai, Naijie & Zhou, Wenliang & Hu, Xinlei, 2022. "Safety evaluation of urban rail transit operation considering uncertainty and risk preference: A case study in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 267-288.
    15. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    16. Rungmaitree, Pattamon & Boateng, Agyenim & Ahiabor, Frederick & Lu, Qinye, 2022. "Political risk, hedge fund strategies, and returns: Evidence from G7 countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Baur, Dirk G. & Smales, Lee A., 2020. "Hedging geopolitical risk with precious metals," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Bega, François, 2021. "China's Belt & Road Initiative coal power cooperation: Transitioning toward low-carbon development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Feng Dong & Yuling Pan, 2020. "Evolution of Renewable Energy in BRI Countries: A Combined Econometric and Decomposition Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Belkhir, Mohamed & Grira, Jocelyn & Hassan, M. Kabir & Soumaré, Issouf, 2019. "Islamic banks and political risk: International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 39-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11297-:d:1198367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.