IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9283-d1166716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of MSWX Bias-Corrected Meteorological Forcing Datasets in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hai Lin

    (Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yi Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Shuguang Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Shuyu Wang

    (School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Jianping Tang

    (Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Citie’s Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change in Shanghai, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Guangtao Dong

    (Key Laboratory of Citie’s Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change in Shanghai, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

Near-surface meteorological forcing (NSMF) datasets, mixed observations, and model forecasts are widely used in global climate change and sustainable development studies. For practical purposes, it is important to evaluate NSMF datasets, especially those released latest, and determine their strengths and limitations. In this study, we evaluate the performance of Multi-Source Weather (MSWX) in China over the period of 1979–2016. For comparison, ECMWF Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD) and Princeton Global Forcing (PGF) dataset are also evaluated to determine the strengths and weaknesses of MSWX. The following variables are compared with observations over 2400 stations: 2 m air temperature (T2m), 2 m daily maximum air temperature (Tmax), 2 m daily minimum air temperature (Tmin), precipitation (P), and 10 m wind speed (V10). The evaluation is conducted in terms of climatology, inter-annual variations and seasonal cycles. Results show that MSWX reasonably reproduces the spatial pattern of T2m with root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) below 1.12 °C and spatial correlations above 0.97, but underestimates Tmax and overestimates Tmin, with biases ranging from −2.0 °C to 2.0 °C, especially over the North China and Northeast China. Compared with ERA5 and PGF, MSWX can better simulate the inter-annual variations of surface air temperature with high spatial correlations (>0.97) but shows higher RMSEs than PGF. For precipitation, MSWX accurately captures the primary features of precipitation, including significant characteristics or patterns of the precipitation climatology and inter-annual variation. Its inter-annual variation shows low RMSEs ranging from 0.55 mm/day to 0.8 mm/day, compared to ERA5 and PGF. However, regions with abundant precipitation exhibit higher biases. Because the biased Global Wind Atlas (GWA3.1) is used for the wind bias correction of MSWX, MSWX significantly overestimates the annual mean wind speed, but it is consistently well-correlated with observations, with RMSEs less than 1.5 m/s and spatial correlations greater than 0.6 over the period of 1979–2016. This study reveals both the advantages and disadvantages of MSWX, and indicates the need for research into climate change and sustainable development in East Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Hai Lin & Yi Yang & Shuguang Wang & Shuyu Wang & Jianping Tang & Guangtao Dong, 2023. "Evaluation of MSWX Bias-Corrected Meteorological Forcing Datasets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9283-:d:1166716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosch, Jonathan & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "Temporally explicit and spatially resolved global offshore wind energy potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 766-781.
    2. Lledó, Ll. & Torralba, V. & Soret, A. & Ramon, J. & Doblas-Reyes, F.J., 2019. "Seasonal forecasts of wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-100.
    3. Gruber, Katharina & Klöckl, Claude & Regner, Peter & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2019. "Assessing the Global Wind Atlas and local measurements for bias correction of wind power generation simulated from MERRA-2 in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Zhang, Peng & Zhang, Junjie & Chen, Minpeng, 2017. "Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: The importance of additional climatic variables other than temperature and precipitation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 8-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    3. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Shaikh M. S. U. Eskander & Sam Fankhauser, 2022. "Income Diversification and Income Inequality: Household Responses to the 2013 Floods in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    7. Zhang, Shaohui & Guo, Qinxin & Smyth, Russell & Yao, Yao, 2022. "Extreme temperatures and residential electricity consumption: Evidence from Chinese households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Ji, Xinde & Cobourn, Kelly M. & Weng, Weizhe, 2018. "The Effect of Climate Change on Irrigated Agriculture: Water-Temperature Interactions and Adaptation in the Western U.S," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274306, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Fernando M. Aragón & Francisco Oteiza & Juan Pablo Rud, 2018. "Climate change and agriculture: farmer adaptation to extreme heat," IFS Working Papers W18/06, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Coderoni, Silvia & Pagliacci, Francesco, 2023. "The impact of climate change on land productivity. A micro-level assessment for Italian farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Yun Qiu & Xi Chen & Wei Shi, 2020. "Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 1127-1172, October.
    12. Fernando M. Arag'on & Francisco Oteiza & Juan Pablo Rud, 2019. "Climate Change and Agriculture: Subsistence Farmers' Response to Extreme Heat," Papers 1902.09204, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    13. Xiaoguang Chen & Madhu Khanna & Lu Yang, 2022. "The impacts of temperature on Chinese food processing firms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 256-279, April.
    14. Tite Ehuitché Béké & Aïssata Sobia, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Climatic Variations on Ivorian Rice Farming," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 88-109, June.
    15. Manamboba Mitélama BALAKA & Koffi YOVO, 2022. "Changement climatique et nutrition infantile au Togo," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 56, pages 111-131.
    16. Chen, Xiaoguang & Cui, Xiaomeng & Gao, Jing, 2023. "Differentiated Agricultural Sensitivity and Adaptability to Rising Temperatures across Regions and Sectors in China," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335522, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Finn Gunnar Nielsen, 2022. "Perspectives and Challenges Related Offshore Wind Turbines in Deep Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-6, April.
    18. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "Geographical optimization of variable renewable energy capacity in China using modern portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Olaofe, Z.O., 2019. "Quantification of the near-surface wind conditions of the African coast: A comparative approach (satellite, NCEP CFSR and WRF-based)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Sabrina Auci & Donatella Vignani, 2020. "Climate variability and agriculture in Italy: a stochastic frontier analysis at the regional level," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(2), pages 381-409, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9283-:d:1166716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.