IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9029-d1162953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution Game and Simulation Analysis of Disturbance Emergency Disposal of In-Flight Cabin: China Civil Aviation Security Strategy Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Wu

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Shiting He

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Qingsong Zhang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Jinxin Shi

    (Cabin Academy, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Jiang Xie

    (Research Institute of Science of Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

Abstract

The disturbance of disruptive passengers in the cabin seriously affects aviation security in China. Reducing the occurrence of disturbances in the cabin is an inevitable choice to strengthen the security of civil aviation in China and improve the emergency disposal of airlines. Therefore, this paper investigates the strength of government support, the benefits of cooperation and the punishment of disposers, and uses the event tree method to analyze the relevant subjects affecting the consequences of cabin disruptions. To this end, a cabin disturbance emergency management game model comprised of regulatory authority, airline security and disruptive passengers was then established. The results of the game playing and simulation highlight the inherent relationships in emergency management in China’s civil aviation. First, the choice of behavior of the regulatory authority and disruptive passengers are mainly influenced by the strategy of airline security. Second, the strength of support from the regulatory authority determines whether the airline security can dispose of the passengers successfully. Third, the disruptive inclination of disruptive passengers is directly influenced by the intensity of punishment by airport police. Finally, an empirical analysis and simulation is conducted with the example of using an open flame or smoking in the cabin. This study provides new ideas for enhancing aviation security and improving emergency management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Wu & Shiting He & Qingsong Zhang & Jinxin Shi & Jiang Xie, 2023. "Evolution Game and Simulation Analysis of Disturbance Emergency Disposal of In-Flight Cabin: China Civil Aviation Security Strategy Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9029-:d:1162953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuechao Chao & Gang Wang, 2023. "Analyzing the Effects of Governmental Policy and Solar Power on Facilitating Carbon Neutralization in the Context of Energy Transition: A Four-Party Evolutionary Game Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Paul McFarlane, 2020. "Linking aviation security failures to human-mediated error. A review of the related literatures with directions for policy and research," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 33-51, June.
    3. Dando, Coral J. & Ormerod, Thomas C., 2020. "Aviation security by consent using the Controlled Cognitive Engagement (CCE) alternative screening programme," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    5. Dennis Keiser & Michael Arenz & Michael Freitag & Matthias Reiß, 2023. "Method to Model the Environmental Impacts of Aircraft Cabin Configurations during the Operational Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Man Zhou & Xiancong Chen & Lei He & Franck Aristide Kiswendsida Ouedraogo, 2022. "Dual-Attitude Decision-Making Processes of Construction Worker Safety Behaviors: A Simulation-Based Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Wenwen Xu & Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri & Khairul Azhar Jamaludin, 2023. "In-Flight Infection Prevention and Control Training for Cabin Crew in China: A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Huiyan Zhao & Haijun Wang & Shutong Jin & Zitong He, 2023. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Collaborative Innovation Mechanisms of Industrial Internet Platform-Based Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Katherine Di-Anna Bell, 2022. "An evaluation into the causes of perpetual disruptive passenger behavior," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Xiaoling Xiong & Jizhi Li & Zejian Lin, 2023. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Participating Subjects in Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Cultivated Land under the Ladder Multiple Supervision Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie & Qunli Zhai, 2022. "Management Policy of Farmers’ Cultivated Land Abandonment Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Wang Mingbao & Du Zhiping & Duan Hong, 2017. "Study on Participant Behavior Game of Electronic Products Reverse Supply Chain Based on ECP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(5), pages 411-434, October.
    4. Sun, Yong & Liu, Baoyin & Sun, Zhongrui & Yang, Ruijia, 2023. "Inter-regional cooperation in the transfers of energy-intensive industry: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Wei Xing & Xuan Zhao, 2018. "Information Acquisition Behavior: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 434-455, June.
    6. Hongxia Sun & Yao Wan & Huirong Lv, 2020. "System Dynamics Model for the Evolutionary Behaviour of Government Enterprises and Consumers in China’s New Energy Vehicle Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    8. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Stark, Oded, 1993. "How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 149-155, May.
    9. Hopkins, Ed, 1999. "Learning, Matching, and Aggregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 79-110, January.
    10. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    12. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    13. Viossat, Yannick, 2008. "Evolutionary dynamics may eliminate all strategies used in correlated equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 27-43, July.
    14. Jinxiu Pi & Hui Yang & Yadong Shu & Chongyi Zhong & Guanghui Yang, 2020. "The Stability of Two-Community Replicator Dynamics with Discrete Multi-Delays," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Guanqiao Pan & Hongchao Jiang & Qianhui Jin & Tianyi Zhao & Jiajun Wang & Li Wang, 2021. "Study on the Sharing Transportation Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    17. Xiongwei Quan & Gaoshan Zuo & Helin Sun, 2022. "Risk Perception Thresholds and Their Impact on the Behavior of Nearby Residents in Waste to Energy Project Conflict: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Aaron Foote & Maryam Gooyabadi & Nikhil Addleman, 2023. "Factors in Learning Dynamics Influencing Relative Strengths of Strategies in Poker Simulation," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Takatoshi Tabuchi & Dao‐Zhi Zeng, 2004. "Stability of Spatial Equilibrium," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 641-660, November.
    20. Xiaoyang Zhao, 2019. "Patenting Or Secret? The Interaction Between Leading Firms And Following Firms Based On Evolutionary Game Theory And Multi-Agent Simulation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9029-:d:1162953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.