IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15553-d981030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Attention Allocation of Land Policy System Reform: A Comparative Analysis Based on Central No. 1 Documents of China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenhua Hu

    (School of Business, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325000, China)

  • Shanshan Jin

    (School of Business, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325000, China)

  • Ziyue Hu

    (School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Degen Lin

    (School of Business, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325000, China)

Abstract

Dealing with relationships on farmland is one of the most important issues in China. Since its reform and opening up, the policies of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) on “agriculture, rural areas, and farmers” have been embodied in the Central No. 1 document. The documents, which represent the purpose of China, reveal the strategic direction and development ideas of the state. Based on Central No. 1 documents published by the Central Committee of the CPC, and using the attention theory from psychology, we proposed PAI and PAD indicators to express the Central Committee of the CPC’s concern and direction on agriculture, and then measured the change in attention allocation of the Central Committee of the CPC’s land policy, as well as what is “new” in the land policy system. Results showed that: First, the attention allocation of the Central Committee of the CPC’s land policy (PAI) shows a wave-like upward trend from 3.9% to 5%, and has gone through the stage of contracting management to benefit people’s livelihoods and liberate productivity, the stage of allocating land resource elements under scientific use control, and the stage of expanding power and enabling capacity to promote the modernization of land management. Second, the policy attention direction (PAD) has experienced a process from the early focus on the release of land factor productivity to the optimal allocation of land factor resources and then to the modernization of land management. Third, the scope of attention allocation is gradually expanding, especially for the construction of ecological civilization and promotion of the modernization of land management. To be specific, it is necessary to reasonably arrange the overall planning of China’s land policy system based on the actual situation, and to clarify and optimize the development direction and the proportion of attention allocation in its subdivision fields. The intention to be the first to push forward the implementation of the relevant policies and pilot issues of land governance modernization will become the new trend of the future research. Based on the actual situation, we should continue to emancipate prevailing perceptions and combine the focus of rural land reform to inject vitality into rural development and into the development of the whole economy and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenhua Hu & Shanshan Jin & Ziyue Hu & Degen Lin, 2022. "Research on Attention Allocation of Land Policy System Reform: A Comparative Analysis Based on Central No. 1 Documents of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15553-:d:981030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Rosa, Michele, 2018. "Land Use and Land-use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment: Green Modelling or Black Boxing?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-81.
    2. Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle & Xinkai Zhu & Shiji Zhao & Yu Sheng, 2020. "Agricultural and rural development in China during the past four decades: an introduction," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 359-370, October.
    4. Brown, Brian P. & Mohan, Mayoor & Eric Boyd, D., 2017. "Top management attention to trade shows and firm performance: A relationship marketing perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 40-50.
    5. Gabor J. Szekely & Maria L. Rizzo, 2005. "Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward's Minimum Variance Method," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 22(2), pages 151-183, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Zhu & Xingcheng Wu & Xueqin Lin & Changqin Huang & Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung & Yong Tang, 2018. "A novel multiple layers name disambiguation framework for digital libraries using dynamic clustering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 781-794, March.
    2. Hyeseon Choi & Nash Jett DG. Reyes & Minsu Jeon & Lee-Hyung Kim, 2021. "Constructed Wetlands in South Korea: Current Status and Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Linde, Jona & Sonnemans, Joep & Tuinstra, Jan, 2014. "Strategies and evolution in the minority game: A multi-round strategy experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 77-95.
    4. Zdeňka Náglová & Tereza Horáková, 2017. "Position of the Bakery Enterprises in the Czech Republic According to Detailed Specification of the Businesses," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(5), pages 1719-1727.
    5. Renato Amorim, 2015. "Feature Relevance in Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering Using the L p Norm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 46-62, April.
    6. Quessy, Jean-François, 2021. "A Szekely–Rizzo inequality for testing general copula homogeneity hypotheses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Carmen C. Rodríguez-Martínez & Mitzi Cubilla-Montilla & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2023. "X-STATIS: A Multivariate Approach to Characterize the Evolution of E-Participation, from a Global Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    9. Fionn Murtagh & Pierre Legendre, 2014. "Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion?," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(3), pages 274-295, October.
    10. Yaotao Xu & Peng Li & Jinjin Pan & Yi Zhang & Xiaohu Dang & Xiaoshu Cao & Junfang Cui & Zhi Yang, 2022. "Eco-Environmental Effects and Spatial Heterogeneity of “Production-Ecology-Living” Land Use Transformation: A Case Study for Ningxia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Zdeněk Hlávka & Marie Hušková & Simos G. Meintanis, 2020. "Change-point methods for multivariate time-series: paired vectorial observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1351-1383, August.
    12. Brault, Vincent & Ouadah, Sarah & Sansonnet, Laure & Lévy-Leduc, Céline, 2018. "Nonparametric multiple change-point estimation for analyzing large Hi-C data matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 143-165.
    13. Changhyeon Song & Kwangsoo Shin, 2019. "Business Model Design for Latecomers in Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Case of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Moon, Seongmin & Hicks, Christian & Simpson, Andrew, 2012. "The development of a hierarchical forecasting method for predicting spare parts demand in the South Korean Navy—A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 794-802.
    15. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    16. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "The impact of applying effort to reduce activity variability on the project time and cost performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 442-453.
    17. Athanasios Constantopoulos & John Yfantopoulos & Panos Xenos & Athanassios Vozikis, 2019. "Cluster shifts based on healthcare factors: The case of Greece in an OECD background 2009-2014," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 1-4.
    18. Mantas Svazas & Valentinas Navickas & Yuriy Bilan & Joanna Nakonieczny & Jana Spankova, 2021. "Biomass Clusterization from a Regional Perspective: The Case of Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Song, Jie & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2020. "The impact of a limited budget on the corrective action taking process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1070-1086.
    20. Jim Hart & Francesco Pomponi, 2020. "More Timber in Construction: Unanswered Questions and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15553-:d:981030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.