IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14980-d971068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Driving Factors of Digital Transformation among Local Governments: Foundations for Smart City Construction in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jianying Xiao

    (School of Public Policy & Management, Research Center of Digital Rural Services, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    The Research Center for Transition Development and Rural Revitalization of Resource-Based Cities in China, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Lixin Han

    (School of Public Policy & Management, Research Center of Digital Rural Services, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hui Zhang

    (School of Public Policy & Management, Research Center of Digital Rural Services, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

To achieve sustainable urban development, many countries around the world are exploring the path of smart cities. The progress and development of digital technology has paved a promising road. Digital transformation of the government is an important factor for smart cities in China. Scholars are increasingly interested in the digital transformation of government, but there is little empirical research on the driving factors of digital transformation among local governments. Based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework, this study explores the driving factors of digital transformation among local governments in China. A questionnaire survey and the structural equation model were used. Technological readiness, organizational efficiency, public service delivery, citizens’ expectations and superior pressure are significant driving factors. Technological readiness is the first factor affecting the government’s digital transformation. Applying the identified drivers, the results of this research could be used as orientation towards, and provide concrete practical approaches for, successful digital transformation among local governments, which would lay a foundation for smart city construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianying Xiao & Lixin Han & Hui Zhang, 2022. "Exploring Driving Factors of Digital Transformation among Local Governments: Foundations for Smart City Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14980-:d:971068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14980/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14980/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Hillol Bala, 2012. "Adoption and Impacts of Interorganizational Business Process Standards: Role of Partnering Synergy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1131-1157, December.
    2. J. Ignacio Criado & Julian Villodre, 2021. "Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 253-275, March.
    3. Simmonds, Hamish & Gazley, Aaron & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Renton, Michelle & Hooper, Val, 2021. "Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public sector digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 100-115.
    4. Mohamed Mahmood & Vishanth Weerakkody & Weifeng Chen, 2019. "The influence of transformed government on citizen trust: insights from Bahrain," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 275-303, April.
    5. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2006. "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1557-1576, October.
    6. Tijan, Edvard & Jović, Marija & Aksentijević, Saša & Pucihar, Andreja, 2021. "Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    8. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi & Melisa Diaz Lema, 2021. "New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 69-72, January.
    9. Ioannis Nanos & Eugenia Papaioannou & Efthymia Androutsou & Vicky Manthou, 2019. "The role of cloud computing and citizens relationship management in digital government transformation," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 120-136.
    10. Ritu Agarwal & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Catherine DesRoches & Ashish K. Jha, 2010. "Research Commentary ---The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 796-809, December.
    11. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public managers’ attitudes toward digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Stephen Curtis, 2019. "Digital transformation—the silver bullet to public service improvement?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 322-324, July.
    13. Xueyang Wang & Xiumei Sun & Haotian Zhang & Chaokai Xue, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Urban Green Innovation CA-Pability: Based on Panel Data of 274 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Ana Alvarenga & Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & João C. O. Matias, 2020. "Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuguang Wang & Xuefu Sun & Shen Zhong, 2023. "Exploring the Multiple Paths to Improve the Construction Level of Digital Government: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the WSR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Jonathan Jacob Paul Latupeirissa & Ni Luh Yulyana Dewi & I Kadek Rian Prayana & Melati Budi Srikandi & Sahri Aflah Ramadiansyah & Ida Bagus Gde Agung Yoga Pramana, 2024. "Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Digitization Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Anne David & Tan Yigitcanlar & Rita Yi Man Li & Juan M. Corchado & Pauline Hope Cheong & Karen Mossberger & Rashid Mehmood, 2023. "Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-43, June.
    4. Enji Li & Qing Chen & Xinyan Zhang & Chen Zhang, 2023. "Digital Government Development, Local Governments’ Attention Distribution and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Hui Zhang & Huiying Ding & Jianying Xiao, 2023. "How Organizational Agility Promotes Digital Transformation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Zhang & Huiying Ding & Jianying Xiao, 2023. "How Organizational Agility Promotes Digital Transformation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Susan Scott & Wanda Orlikowski, 2022. "The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 311-336, March.
    4. Scott, Susan V. & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2022. "The digital undertow: how the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Lu, Liyan & Liang, Changyong & Gu, Dongxiao & Ma, Yiming & Xie, Yuguang & Zhao, Shuping, 2021. "What advantages of blockchain affect its adoption in the elderly care industry? A study based on the technology–organisation–environment framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Luigi Nasta & Luca Pirolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies to Fight the Pandemic Crisis: Evidence from The Vatican Museums," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(4), pages 163-174, August.
    7. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah, 2023. "The Influence of Technological Factors on the Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Usage during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Hsu, Pei-Fang & Ray, Soumya & Li-Hsieh, Yu-Yu, 2014. "Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 474-488.
    9. Holmström, Jonny, 2022. "From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 329-339.
    10. Ebrahim A. A. Ghaleb & P. D. D. Dominic & Suliman Mohamed Fati & Amgad Muneer & Rao Faizan Ali, 2021. "The Assessment of Big Data Adoption Readiness with a Technology–Organization–Environment Framework: A Perspective towards Healthcare Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    11. Titah, Ryad & Shuraida, Shadi & Rekik, Yacine, 2016. "Integration breach: Investigating the effect of internal and external information sharing and coordination on firm profit," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 34-47.
    12. Ritu Agarwal & Michelle Dugas & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & P. K. Kannan, 2020. "Emerging technologies and analytics for a new era of value-centered marketing in healthcare," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 9-23, January.
    13. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    14. Khogali Hind, 2022. "Saudi Vision 2030: Applying a Sustainable Smart Techno-Cultural Assessment Method to Evaluate Museums’ Performance Post-COVID-19," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-46, May.
    15. Ghadah Lafi Alharbi & Monira Essa Aloud, 2024. "The effects of knowledge management processes on service sector performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Luther Yuong Qai Chong & Thien Sang Lim, 2022. "Pull and Push Factors of Data Analytics Adoption and Its Mediating Role on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    18. Yu-Kai Lin & Mingfeng Lin & Hsinchun Chen, 2019. "Do Electronic Health Records Affect Quality of Care? Evidence from the HITECH Act," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 306-318, March.
    19. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    20. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14980-:d:971068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.