IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9269-d874605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Government Regulations on Under-Reporting of Carbon Emission Transfers by Enterprises in Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Biying Zhao

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    International Genome Center, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Licheng Sun

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Siying Gao

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

In low-carbon environments, asymmetric carbon information causes the enterprises in a supply chain to face the risk of misstatements about carbon emissions. Such misstatements could affect the decisions about carbon emission transfers in the supply chain. To optimize carbon emission transfers among supply chain enterprises, this study formulates a supplier-led Stackelberg game model incorporating the government’s initial carbon emission allowances and fines. The study also examines the mechanism of the behaviors of enterprises in low-carbon supply chains, the proportions of initial quotas, the impact of government fines on carbon transfers, and the influence of the supply chain and carbon emission transfers on related supply chain decisions and profits. The main findings are as follows. First, the proportion of the government’s initial quota has a positive effect on the carbon emission transfer quantity of the supplier, while government fines and misstatement factors have a negative effect. Second, the carbon emissions of the unit product of the supplier decrease as the under-reporting factor and carbon emission transfer quantity of the supplier increase. The under-reporting factor has a stronger effect on the carbon emissions of the unit product. Third, in a carbon-free market, carbon emission transfers negatively affect the disclosed profits of the supply chain, whereas in a perfect carbon market, the carbon trading price has a certain endogenous regulation mechanism for the suppliers’ operational decisions. Fourth, the supplier’s wholesale price order quantity is negatively correlated with the supplier’s carbon emission transfer quantity, but positively correlated with the initial carbon quota ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Biying Zhao & Licheng Sun & Siying Gao, 2022. "Effects of Government Regulations on Under-Reporting of Carbon Emission Transfers by Enterprises in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9269-:d:874605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blanco, Christian & Caro, Felipe & Corbett, Charles J., 2017. "An inside perspective on carbon disclosure," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 635-646.
    2. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    3. Licheng Sun & Sui Fang, 2022. "Irrational Carbon Emission Transfers in Supply Chains under Environmental Regulation: Identification and Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Jin, Mingzhou & Mao, Jiafu, 2021. "Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 910-925.
    5. Zeng, Yingying, 2017. "Indirect double regulation and the carbon ETSs linking: The case of coal-fired generation in the EU and China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 268-280.
    6. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    7. Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Xiaoyong & Xu, Qing & Wu, Fei & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2018. "Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-193.
    8. Xie, Rui & Hu, Guangxiao & Zhang, Youguo & Liu, Yu, 2017. "Provincial transfers of enabled carbon emissions in China: A supply-side perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 688-697.
    9. Chavez, Roberto & Malik, Mohsin & Ghaderi, Hadi & Yu, Wantao, 2021. "Environmental orientation, external environmental information exchange and environmental performance: Examining mediation and moderation effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Li, Xiaojing & Chen, Jing & Ai, Xingzheng, 2019. "Contract design in a cross-sales supply chain with demand information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 939-956.
    11. Sun, Licheng & Wang, Qunwei & Zhang, Jijian, 2017. "Inter-industrial Carbon Emission Transfers in China: Economic Effect and Optimization Strategy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 55-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Li, Cunfang & Zhang, Bo & Lai, Yongzeng & Dong, Mei & Li, Danping, 2019. "Does the trans-regional transfer of resource-oriented enterprises generate a stress effect?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Zhong, Zhangqi & Guo, Zhifang & Zhang, Jianwu, 2021. "Does the participation in global value chains promote interregional carbon emissions transferring via trade? Evidence from 39 major economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Jiang, Jingjing & Ye, Bin & Liu, Junguo, 2019. "Peak of CO2 emissions in various sectors and provinces of China: Recent progress and avenues for further research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 813-833.
    5. Xiao Zhou & Xiancong Wu, 2023. "Decisions for a Retailer-Led Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Altruistic Preference under Carbon Quota Policy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Li, Xiaoyu & Zeng, Zhao & Zhang, Zengkai & Yao, Ye & Du, Huibin, 2023. "The rising North-South carbon flows within China from 2012 to 2017," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 263-272.
    7. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. PU, Zhengning & YUE, Shujing & GAO, Peng, 2020. "The driving factors of China's embodied carbon emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Changhong Li & Jialuo Wang & Jiao Zheng & Jiani Gao, 2022. "Effects of Carbon Policy on Carbon Emission Reduction in Supply Chain under Uncertain Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Shi, Jinzhao & Liu, Dian & Du, Qiang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "The role of the procurement commitment contract in a low-carbon supply chain with a capital-constrained supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Aishuang Zhou & Jinsheng Zhou & Jingjian Si & Guoyu Wang, 2023. "Study on Embodied CO 2 Emissions and Transfer Pathways of Chinese Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Wang, Xiaojun & Chen, Yiping & Chen, Jingjing & Mao, Bingjing & Peng, Lihong & Yu, Ang, 2022. "China's CO2 regional synergistic emission reduction: Killing two birds with one stone?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    15. Guangxiong Mao & Wei Jin & Ying Zhu & Yanjun Mao & Wei-Ling Hsu & Hsin-Lung Liu, 2021. "Environmental Pollution Effects of Regional Industrial Transfer Illustrated with Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Amiri-Pebdani, Sima & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing in competitive energy supply chains considering government interventions to support CCS under cap-and-trade regulations: A game-theoretic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Shi Wang & Hua Wang & Li Zhang & Jun Dang, 2019. "Provincial Carbon Emissions Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    20. Eryu Zhang & Xiaoyu He & Peng Xiao, 2022. "Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9269-:d:874605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.