IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13470-d695906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Perceived Risk of Blockchain Art Trading on User Attitude and Behavioral Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Pi-Hsia Liang

    (Department of Management Information System, National Chengchi University, Taipei 116302, Taiwan)

  • Yan-Ping Chi

    (Department of Management Information System, National Chengchi University, Taipei 116302, Taiwan)

Abstract

In the first half of 2020, the average sales volume of gallery operators declined due to the COVID-19 pandemic and art galleries faced a crisis relating to their sustainable operation. However, crypto art finance, which combines online sales with blockchain, is attracting a considerable amount of attention. Can the use of blockchain solve the problems encountered in today’s art trading market? Is it considered acceptable by participants in the art trading market? What factors affect the behavioral intentions of blockchain technology users? In this study, we discussed the relationship between perceived risks and the three external variables of trust, government support, and auction house initiative, as well as their impacts on user attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding blockchain. The results of this study verified key factors that will help to increase the use of blockchain and solve existing market issues. It will also promote the sustainable operation and development of art enterprises and the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Pi-Hsia Liang & Yan-Ping Chi, 2021. "Influence of Perceived Risk of Blockchain Art Trading on User Attitude and Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13470-:d:695906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Saberi & Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis & Lejia Shen, 2019. "Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2117-2135, April.
    2. Yun-Ciao Wang & Chin-Ling Chen & Yong-Yuan Deng, 2021. "Museum-Authorization of Digital Rights: A Sustainable and Traceable Cultural Relics Exhibition Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Patrick Bajari & Ali Hortaçsu, 2004. "Economic Insights from Internet Auctions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 457-486, June.
    4. TIAN, Xiaoli & KOU, Gang & ZHANG, Weike, 2020. "Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Albayati, Hayder & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2020. "Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee & Chia-Wen Tsai & Amit Kumar Agrawal, 2021. "Impact of peer influence and government support for successful adoption of technology for vocational education: A quantitative study using PLS-SEM technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2041-2064, December.
    8. Liu, Shiyuan & Du, Jiang & Zhang, Weike & Tian, Xiaoli & Kou, Gang, 2021. "Innovation quantity or quality? The role of political connections," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    9. Lai-Wan Wong & Garry Wei-Han Tan & Voon-Hsien Lee & Keng-Boon Ooi & Amrik Sohal, 2020. "Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2100-2123, April.
    10. Esther Salmerón-Manzano & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2019. "The Role of Smart Contracts in Sustainability: Worldwide Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    12. Shiyuan Liu & Jiang Du & Weike Zhang & Xiaoli Tian, 2021. "Opening the box of subsidies: which is more effective for innovation?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 421-449, September.
    13. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    14. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Rebekkah Navas & Hyo Jung (Julie) Chang & Samina Khan & Jo Woon Chong, 2021. "Sustainability Transparency and Trustworthiness of Traditional and Blockchain Ecolabels: A Comparison of Generations X and Y Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Jaehun Joo & Yuming Han, 2021. "An Evidence of Distributed Trust in Blockchain-Based Sustainable Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Ajit Kambil & Eric van Heck, 1998. "Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Bocart, Fabian & Oosterlinck, Kim, 2011. "Discoveries of fakes: Their impact on the art market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 124-126.
    19. Zhang, Weike & Zhang, Xueyuan & Tian, Xiaoli & Sun, Fengwei, 2021. "Economic policy uncertainty nexus with corporate risk-taking: The role of state ownership and corruption expenditure," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Jian Mou & Dong-Hee Shin & Jason F. Cohen, 2017. "Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 255-288, June.
    21. Silvia Beltrametti & James V. Marrone, 2016. "Market Responses to Court Rulings: Evidence from Antiquities Auctions," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 913-944.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tzu-Chi Wu & Chien-Ta Bruce Ho, 2023. "Barriers to Telemedicine Adoption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Comparison of Perceived Risks by Socioeconomic Status Correlates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pu, Xiaohong & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Weike, 2023. "Corporate sustainable development driven by high-quality innovation: Does fiscal decentralization really matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 273-289.
    2. Zhang, Weike & Luo, Qian & Liu, Shiyuan, 2022. "Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 105-121.
    3. Yuegang Song & Songlin Jin & Zhenhui Li, 2022. "Venture Capital and Chinese Firms’ Technological Innovation Capability: Effective Evaluation and Mechanism Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Li, Xin & Li, Zheng & Su, Chi-Wei & Umar, Muhammad & Shao, Xuefeng, 2022. "Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on China's carbon emissions trading market price: Do different types of uncertainty matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Kirti Nayal & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Pragati Priyadarshinee & Gajanan B. Panchal & Vidyadhar V. Gedam, 2023. "Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 293-337, August.
    6. Yu, Zhen & Shen, Yiran & Jiang, Shengjun, 2022. "The effects of corporate governance uncertainty on state-owned enterprises' green innovation in China: Perspective from the participation of non-state-owned shareholders," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Ammar AL-Ashmori & P. D. D. Dominic & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, 2022. "Items and Constructs of Blockchain Adoption in Software Development Industry: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Oscar Rodriguez-Espindola & Prasanta Dey & Pawan Budhwar, 2023. "Blockchain technology adoption for managing risks in operations and supply chain management: evidence from the UK," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 539-574, August.
    9. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Shuib Bin Basri & P. D. D. Dominic & Luiz Fernando Capretz & Amgad Muneer & Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga Balogun & Abdul Rehman Gilal & Rao Faizan Ali, 2022. "Classifications of Sustainable Factors in Blockchain Adoption: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Liu, Shiyuan & Du, Jiang & Zhang, Weike & Tian, Xiaoli & Kou, Gang, 2021. "Innovation quantity or quality? The role of political connections," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "A Critical Review of Blockchain Acceptance Models—Blockchain Technology Adoption Frameworks and Applications," Post-Print hal-03741851, HAL.
    12. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Siqin, Tana, 2022. "Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Gunasekar Thangarasu & P. D. D. Dominic & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    16. Chen, Xia & Miraz, Mahadi Hasan & Gazi, Md. Abu Issa & Rahaman, Md. Atikur & Habib, Md. Mamun & Hossain, Abu Ishaque, 2022. "Factors affecting cryptocurrency adoption in digital business transactions: The mediating role of customer satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Meents, S. & Verhagen, T. & Vlaar, P.W.L., 2011. "How sellers can stimulate purchasing in electronic marketplaces: Using information as a risk reduction signal," Serie Research Memoranda 0014, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kumar, Ajay & Antony, Jiju, 2023. "Influences of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology on financial resilience of supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13470-:d:695906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.