IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6497-d570413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Mahsa Pishdar

    (Department of Industrial and Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom 17469-37181, Iran)

  • Masoumeh Danesh Shakib

    (Industrial Management Department, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin 34185-1416, Iran)

  • Jurgita Antucheviciene

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Arvydas Vilkonis

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Stakeholders are increasingly aware of the aspect of sustainability, and the fact that the circular economy facilitates the achievement of sustainable development goals. They place pressure on supply chains to become sustainable, and for this reason, third-party logistics (3PL) service providers, as specialized professionals, play a vital role in sustainable supply chain management. Although developments in technology in the era of Industry 4.0 have been effective at directing 3PLs along the path towards sustainability, integrated management of forward and reverse logistics systems in order to achieve a circular economy and to become sustainable remains a problem, even in developed countries. However, benchmarking and using the experiences of others can help to speed up this path at a minimal cost. An interval type-2 fuzzy super-slack-based measure network DEA was developed to make such benchmarking possible. Governance style, staff behavior, environmental management systems, and social elements are considered, alongside the principles of the circular economy, in order to compare the sustainability performance of 17 3PLs with respect to different aspects through the application of the developed DEA model. Proper benchmarking with respect to strategies and operations of the 3PLs that are recognized as efficient makes it possible for these 3PLs to overcome obstacles and progress at a lower cost. The results show that 3PLs do not have a comprehensive sustainability strategy that is coordinated with an overall vision of the total supply chain. An investigation into the development of a framework with multiple steps for the guidance of 3PLs, as well as the whole supply chain, towards sustainability in the Industry 4.0 era would be a fruitful next study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahsa Pishdar & Masoumeh Danesh Shakib & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Arvydas Vilkonis, 2021. "Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6497-:d:570413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tânia FERRARO & Leonor PAIS & Nuno REBELO DOS SANTOS & João Manuel MOREIRA, 2018. "The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(2), pages 243-265, June.
    2. Cowan, Kirsten & Guzman, Francisco, 2020. "How CSR reputation, sustainability signals, and country-of-origin sustainability reputation contribute to corporate brand performance: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 683-693.
    3. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Olfat, Laya & Amiri, Maghsoud & Bamdad Soufi, Jahanyar & Pishdar, Mahsa, 2016. "A dynamic network efficiency measurement of airports performance considering sustainable development concept: A fuzzy dynamic network-DEA approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 272-290.
    5. Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Anna Maria Ferrari & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2020. "Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    8. Rodrigues, Antonio Carlos & Martins, Ricardo Silveira & Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Siegler, Janaina, 2018. "Efficiency of specialized 3PL providers in an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 163-178.
    9. Tran, Trung Hieu & Mao, Yong & Nathanail, Paul & Siebers, Peer-Olaf & Robinson, Darren, 2019. "Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 156-165.
    10. Park, Hyejune & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2016. "Proactive versus reactive apparel brands in sustainability: Influences on brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 114-122.
    11. Pietro Evangelista & Lodovico Santoro & Antonio Thomas, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-34, May.
    12. Wang, Fan & Yang, Xiao & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Xiong, Minghua, 2019. "Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm: Effects of risk preference and demand volatility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 312-328.
    13. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    14. Rajesh, R. & Pugazhendhi, S. & Ganesh, K. & Muralidharan, C. & Sathiamoorthy, R., 2011. "Influence of 3PL service offerings on client performance in India," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 149-165, March.
    15. Gu, Yu & Fu, Xiao & Liu, Zhiyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Performance of transportation network under perturbations: Reliability, vulnerability, and resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Adivar, Burcu & Hüseyinoğlu, Işık Özge Yumurtacı & Christopher, Martin, 2019. "A quantitative performance management framework for assessing omnichannel retail supply chains," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 257-269.
    17. Wanke, Peter & Barros, C.P. & Nwaogbe, Obioma R., 2016. "Assessing productive efficiency in Nigerian airports using Fuzzy-DEA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 9-19.
    18. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana V. Ratner & Artem M. Shaposhnikov & Andrey V. Lychev, 2023. "Network DEA and Its Applications (2017–2022): A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Myoungjae Choi & Ohjin Kwon & Dongkyu Won & Wooseok Jang, 2021. "Identifying the Policy Direction of National R&D Programs Based on Data Envelopment Analysis and Diversity Index Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Yu, Ming-Miin & Rakshit, Ipsita, 2023. "Assessing the dynamic efficiency and technology gap of airports under different ownerships: A union dynamic NDEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Matthias Klumpp, 2017. "Do Forwarders Improve Sustainability Efficiency? Evidence from a European DEA Malmquist Index Calculation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-33, May.
    4. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    5. Chi-Yo Huang & Min-Jen Yang & Jeen-Fong Li & Hueiling Chen, 2021. "A DANP-Based NDEA-MOP Approach to Evaluating the Patent Commercialization Performance of Industry–Academic Collaborations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Investigating the regional sustainable performance of the Chinese real estate industry: A slack-based DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 141-159.
    7. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena, 2019. "Accounting for slacks to measure dynamic inefficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 463-471.
    10. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Alperovych, Yan & Amess, Kevin & Wright, Mike, 2013. "Private equity firm experience and buyout vendor source: What is their impact on efficiency?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 601-611.
    12. Fatemeh Boloori & Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2021. "Relative partial efficiency: network and black box SBM DEA interpretations in multiplier form," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2689-2718, December.
    13. Liang-Han Ma & Jin-Chi Hsieh & Ying Li & Yung-Ho Chiu, 2021. "Evaluating Efficiency Change in Taiwan’s Financial Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    14. Ming-Fu Hsu & Ying-Shao Hsin & Fu-Jiing Shiue, 2022. "Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 629-669, August.
    15. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    16. Wang, Qian & Ren, Shuming, 2022. "Evaluation of green technology innovation efficiency in a regional context: A dynamic network slacks-based measuring approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Zhen Shi & Shijiong Qin & Yung-ho Chiu & Xiaoying Tan & Xiaoli Miao, 2021. "The impact of gross domestic product on the financing and investment efficiency of China’s commercial banks," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Azadi, Majid & Yousefi, Saeed & Farzipoor Saen, Reza & Shabanpour, Hadi & Jabeen, Fauzia, 2023. "Forecasting sustainability of healthcare supply chains using deep learning and network data envelopment analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Day‐Yang Liu & Hsin‐Hsin Yao & Wen‐Min Lu & Cheng‐Hsien Lin, 2020. "Impulse response function analysis of the impacts of land value‐added tax policy on government performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1020-1032, September.
    20. Liu, John S. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2010. "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 453-464, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6497-:d:570413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.