IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1064-d315787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Age Management on Sustainability in Czech Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Urbancová

    (Department of Human Resources, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lucie Vnoučková

    (Department of Management, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Zdenek Linhart

    (Department of Marketing, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Gabriela Ježková Petrů

    (Department of Human Resources, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Roman Zuzák

    (Department of Management, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Holečková

    (Department of Business Economics, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic)

  • Zita Prostějovská

    (Department of Management, University of Economics and Management, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Age management is becoming an increasingly important part of strategic human resources management practices and can ultimately lead to a competitive advantage. Research results confirmed that a strategic focus on the efficient use of all age categories of employees yields retention, the successful achievement of organisation goals, development, and, ultimately, a competitive advantage. The aim of this article is to identify and evaluate approaches to age management practices in organisations in 1271 organisations in the Czech Republic. Quantitative research was carried out in selected organisations operating over a three-year period. Data was gathered from these organisations and evaluated using descriptive and multidimensional statistics. The results show that those organisations focusing on the application of age management practices achieved a competitive advantage regardless of size or sector of the organisation. Statistical analysis (χ2 test, Cramer’s V, factor analysis) on survey data shows that many of these organisations achieved significant perceived benefits from the application of age management. The approach to age management application varies in organisations depending on whether it is an internal branding of an employer or response to a crisis. Organisations either use of best practices to implement age management or it is a carefully planned process in advance. Follow-up research can focus on the use of age management in crisis management or employer branding. This study is a non-experimental quantitative correlation analysis utilising longitudinal empirical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Urbancová & Lucie Vnoučková & Zdenek Linhart & Gabriela Ježková Petrů & Roman Zuzák & Lenka Holečková & Zita Prostějovská, 2020. "Impact of Age Management on Sustainability in Czech Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1064-:d:315787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hairault, Jean-Olivier & Langot, Francois & Sopraseuth, Thepthida, 2019. "Unemployment fluctuations over the life cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 334-352.
    2. Bieling, Gisela & Stock, Ruth Maria & Dorozalla, Florian, 2015. "Coping with demographic change in job markets: How age diversity management contributes to organisational performance," Zeitschrift fuer Personalforschung. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 29(1), pages 5-30.
    3. Sari Mansour & Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay, 2019. "What strategy of human resource management to retain older workers?," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 135-153, January.
    4. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller & Barry Scholnick, 2008. "Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non‐Family Businesses," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 51-78, January.
    5. Blanco-Mazagatos, Virginia & de Quevedo-Puente, Esther & Delgado-García, Juan Bautista, 2018. "Human resource practices and organizational human capital in the family firm: The effect of generational stage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 337-348.
    6. de Grip, Andries & Pleijers, Astrid, 2019. "Workshop attendance as a mode of learning: Evidence from the Netherlands," ROA Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    7. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2009. "Agency vs. Stewardship in Public Family Firms: A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(6), pages 1169-1191, November.
    8. Miloš Hitka & Alžbeta Kucharčíková & Peter Štarchoň & Žaneta Balážová & Michal Lukáč & Zdenko Stacho, 2019. "Knowledge and Human Capital as Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Eddleston, Kimberly A. & Sieger, Philipp & Bernhard, Fabian, 2019. "From suffering firm to suffering family? How perceived firm performance relates to managers' work-to-family conflict," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 307-321.
    10. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Alessio Cozzolino & Frank T. Rothaermel, 2018. "Discontinuities, competition, and cooperation: Coopetitive dynamics between incumbents and entrants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3053-3085, December.
    12. Jones, Russell & Llewellyn, John, 2019. "Maintaining Stable Macroeconomic Conditions," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 250, pages 7-14, November.
    13. João Varajão & António Trigo & Pedro Soto-Acosta, 2016. "An Exploratory Study on the Influencers of the Perceived Relevance of CIO's Activities," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Hairault, Jean-Olivier & Langot, Francois & Sopraseuth, Thepthida, 2019. "Unemployment fluctuations over the life cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 334-352.
    15. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    16. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    17. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Rui, Huaichuan, 2017. "Barriers to absorptive capacity in emerging market firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 727-742.
    18. Debarun Chakraborty & Wendrila Biswas, 2019. "Evaluating the impact of human resource planning programs in addressing the strategic goal of the firm," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(5), pages 659-682, May.
    19. Sinkovics, Noemi & Hoque, Samia Ferdous & Sinkovics, Rudolf R., 2018. "Supplier Strategies and Routines for Capability Development: Implications for Upgrading," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 348-368.
    20. Andrej Privara & Eva Rievajová & Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin, 2019. "Labour Market Disadvantages Faced by Migrant Workers from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia in Britain," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 16(4), pages 585-594, October.
    21. Ilayda Nemlioglu & Sushanta K. Mallick, 2017. "Do Managerial Practices Matter in Innovation and Firm Performance Relations? New Evidence from the UK," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(5), pages 1016-1061, October.
    22. Sharon Gotteiner & Marta Mas-Machuca & Frederic Marimon, 2019. "Fighting organizational decline: a risk-based approach to organizational anti-aging," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1259-1277, August.
    23. de Grip, Andries & Pleijers, Astrid, 2019. "Workshop attendance as a mode of learning:," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen Jaldestad & Andrea Eriksson & Philip Blom & Britt Östlund, 2021. "Factors Influencing Retirement Decisions among Blue-Collar Workers in a Global Manufacturing Company—Implications for Age Management from A System Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Natália Vraňaková & Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Andrea Chlpeková, 2021. "Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Martina Hlatká & Ondrej Stopka & Ladislav Bartuška & Mária Stopková & Daniela N. Yordanova & Patrik Gross & Petr Sádlo, 2021. "Draft Methodology of the Age Management Implementation in Human Resource Management in a Transport Company," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hana Urbancová & Pavla Vrabcová, 2021. "Implementing selected strategic documents focused on increasing efficiency and competitiveness of agricultural enterprises in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 144-151.
    2. Barros, Ismael & Hernangómez, Juan & Martin-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "A theoretical model of strategic management of family firms. A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 149-159.
    3. Bird, Miriam & Wennberg, Karl, 2014. "Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 421-436.
    4. Arnaud Chéron & Anthony Terriau, 2023. "On-The-Job Search, Life-cycle Training, and the Role of Transfer Fees," TEPP Working Paper 2023-06, TEPP.
    5. Langley, Paul & Rieple, Alison, 2021. "Incumbents’ capabilities to win in a digitised world: The case of the fashion industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Jara, Mauricio & López-Iturriaga, Félix J. & Torres, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Firm value and pyramidal structures: New evidence for family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 399-412.
    7. Franco Ernesto Rubino & Paolo Tenuta & Domenico Rocco Cambrea, 2017. "Board characteristics effects on performance in family and non-family business: a multi-theoretical approach," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 623-658, September.
    8. Vanessa Weimann & Maike Gerken & Marcel Hülsbeck, 2020. "Business model innovation in family firms: dynamic capabilities and the moderating role of socioemotional wealth," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 369-399, April.
    9. Alessandro Minichilli & Mattias Nordqvist & Guido Corbetta & Mario Daniele Amore, 2014. "CEO Succession Mechanisms, Organizational Context, and Performance: A Socio-Emotional Wealth Perspective on Family-Controlled Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1153-1179, November.
    10. Randerson, Kathleen & Bettinelli, Cristina & Fayolle, Alain & Anderson, Alistair, 2015. "Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: Exploring its contours and contents," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 143-154.
    11. Marco Cucculelli & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo & Fernanda Ricotta, 2014. "Owner‐Management, Firm Age, and Productivity in Italian Family Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 325-343, April.
    12. William Tabor & Kristen Madison & Laura E. Marler & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2020. "The Effects of Spiritual Leadership in Family Firms: A Conservation of Resources Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 729-743, May.
    13. Bauweraerts, Jonathan & Colot, Olivier, 2017. "Exploring nonlinear effects of family involvement in the board on entrepreneurial orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 185-192.
    14. Pieper, Torsten M., 2010. "Non solus: Toward a psychology of family business," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 26-39, March.
    15. A. Ashwin & Rishikesha Krishnan & Rejie George, 2015. "Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 869-900, December.
    16. Kimberly A. Eddleston & James J. Chrisman & Lloyd P. Steier & Jess H. Chua, 2010. "Governance and Trust in Family Firms: An Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(6), pages 1043-1056, November.
    17. Sharon Belenzon & Andrea Patacconi & Rebecca Zarutskie, 2016. "Married to the firm? A large‐scale investigation of the social context of ownership," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 2611-2638, December.
    18. Valeriano Sanchez-Famoso & Jorge-Humberto Mejia-Morelos & Luis Cisneros, 2020. "New Insights into Non-Listed Family SMEs in Spain: Board Social Capital, Board Effectiveness, and Sustainable Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    19. César Camisón-Zornoza & Beatriz Forés-Julián & Alba Puig-Denia & Sergio Camisón-Haba, 0. "Effects of ownership structure and corporate and family governance on dynamic capabilities in family firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-34.
    20. Qiao Wei & Jin-hui Luo & Xueli Huang, 2020. "Influence of Social Identity on Family Firms’ FDI Decisions: The Moderating Role of Internal Capital Markets," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 651-693, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1064-:d:315787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.