IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2500-d226832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Nandor Csikos

    (Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, Egyetem u. 2–6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Malte Schwanebeck

    (Department of Geography, Division of Physical Geography: Landscape Ecology and Geoinformation Science, Center for Geoinformation, Kiel University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany)

  • Michael Kuhwald

    (Department of Geography, Division of Physical Geography: Landscape Ecology and Geoinformation Science, Kiel University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany)

  • Peter Szilassi

    (Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, Egyetem u. 2–6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Rainer Duttmann

    (Department of Geography, Division of Physical Geography: Landscape Ecology and Geoinformation Science, Kiel University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

The increasing use of biogas, produced from energy crops like silage maize, is supposed to noticeably change the structures and patterns of agricultural landscapes in Europe. The main objective of our study is to quantify this assumed impact of intensive biogas production with the example of an agrarian landscape in Northern Germany. Therefore, we used three different datasets; Corine Land Cover (CLC), local agricultural statistics (Agrar-Struktur-Erhebung, ASE), and data on biogas power plants. Via kernel density analysis, we delineated impact zones which represent different levels of bioenergy-generated transformations of agrarian landscapes. We cross-checked the results by the analyses of the land cover and landscape pattern changes from 2000 to 2012 inside the impact zones. We found significant correlations between the installed electrical capacity (IC) and land cover changes. According to our findings, the landscape pattern of cropland—expressed via landscape metrics (mean patch size (MPS), total edge (TE), mean shape index (MSI), mean fractal dimension index (MFRACT)—increased and that of pastures decreased since the beginning of biogas production. Moreover, our study indicates that the increasing number of biogas power plants in certain areas is accompanied with a continuous reduction in crop diversity and a homogenization of land use in the same areas. We found maximum degrees of land use homogenisation in areas with highest IC. Our results show that a Kernel density map of the IC of biogas power plants might offer a suitable first indicator for monitoring and quantifying landscape change induced by biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2500-:d:226832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Leo, Senatro & Salvia, Monica, 2017. "Local strategies and action plans towards resource efficiency in South East Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 286-305.
    2. Appel, Franziska & Ostermeyer-Wiethaup, Arlette & Balmann, Alfons, 2016. "Effects of the German Renewable Energy Act on structural change in agriculture – The case of biogas," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 172-182.
    3. P. Michael Link & Christine Schleupner, 2007. "Agricultural land use changes in Eiderstedt," Working Papers FNU-137, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jun 2007.
    4. Michael Kuhwald & Katja Dörnhöfer & Natascha Oppelt & Rainer Duttmann, 2018. "Spatially Explicit Soil Compaction Risk Assessment of Arable Soils at Regional Scale: The SaSCiA-Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Lausch, Angela & Blaschke, Thomas & Haase, Dagmar & Herzog, Felix & Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe & Tischendorf, Lutz & Walz, Ulrich, 2015. "Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 31-41.
    6. Pantaleo, Antonio & Gennaro, Bernardo De & Shah, Nilay, 2013. "Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: An application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 57-70.
    7. Gao, Mingxue & Wang, Danmeng & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Biogas potential, utilization and countermeasures in agricultural provinces: A case study of biogas development in Henan Province, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 191-200.
    8. Delzeit, Ruth & Britz, Wolfgang & Holm-Müller, Karin, 2011. "Modelling regional input markets with numerous processing plants: The case of green maize for biogas production in Germany," Discussion Papers 162892, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    9. Christine Schleupner & P. Michael Link, 2007. "Potential impacts on important bird habitats in Eiderstedt (Schleswig-Holstein) caused by agricultural land use changes," Working Papers FNU-138, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jun 2007.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Csikós, Nándor & Tóth, Gergely, 2023. "Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2020. "Impact of Energy Landscapes on the Abundance of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ), an Example from North Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Janina Piekutin & Monika Puchlik & Michał Haczykowski & Katarzyna Dyczewska, 2021. "The Efficiency of the Biogas Plant Operation Depending on the Substrate Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Jacek Piekarski & Paweł Kogut, 2021. "Influence of Selected Substrate Dosage on the Process of Biogas Installation Start-Up in Real Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Xueqing Yang & Yang Liu & Mei Wang & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2021. "Identifying the Necessities of Regional-Based Analysis to Study Germany’s Biogas Production Development under Energy Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2020. "Impact of Energy Landscapes on the Abundance of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ), an Example from North Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    3. Stelios Rozakis & Andrea Bartoli & Jacek Dach & Anna Jędrejek & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Łukasz Mamica & Patrycja Pochwatka & Rafał Pudelko & Kesheng Shu, 2021. "Policy Impact on Regional Biogas Using a Modular Modeling Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Zhang, Ruirui & Wang, Guiling & Shen, Xiaoxu & Wang, Jinfeng & Tan, Xianfeng & Feng, Shoutao & Hong, Jinglan, 2020. "Is geothermal heating environmentally superior than coal fired heating in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Monika Vilkiene & Ieva Mockeviciene & Grazina Kadziene & Danute Karcauskiene & Regina Repsiene & Ona Auskalniene, 2023. "Bacterial Communities: Interaction to Abiotic Conditions under Effect of Anthropogenic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    8. Heinrich, F. & Appel, F., 2018. "Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín & Vavrouchová Hana & Ševelová Miloslava & Kozlovská Silvie & Doskočilová Veronika & Lincová Helena, 2015. "Changes Of A Rural Landscape In Czech Areas Of Different Types," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 111-133, June.
    10. Shang, Linmei & Heckelei, Thomas & Gerullis, Maria K. & Börner, Jan & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Troxler, David & Zabel, Astrid & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne, 2023. "Identifying drivers of forest clearances in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Olena Myrna & Martin Odening & Matthias Ritter, 2019. "The Influence of Wind Energy and Biogas on Farmland Prices," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Kremmydas, Dimitris & Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. & Rozakis, Stelios, 2018. "A review of Agent Based Modeling for agricultural policy evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 95-106.
    15. Su, Xing & Shao, Xiaolu & Geng, Yining & Tian, Shaochen & Huang, Yixiang, 2022. "Optimization of feedstock and insulating strategies to enhance biogas production of solar-assisted biodigester system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 59-68.
    16. Alexander E. Cagle & Alona Armstrong & Giles Exley & Steven M. Grodsky & Jordan Macknick & John Sherwin & Rebecca R. Hernandez, 2020. "The Land Sparing, Water Surface Use Efficiency, and Water Surface Transformation of Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Bartoli, A. & Cavicchioli, D. & Kremmydas, D. & Rozakis, S. & Olper, A., 2016. "The impact of different energy policy options on feedstock price and land demand for maize silage: The case of biogas in Lombardy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 351-363.
    18. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Drechsler, Martin & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Ohl, Cornelia, 2012. "The effect of feed-in tariffs on the production cost and the landscape externalities of wind power generation in West Saxony, Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 730-736.
    20. Ruth Delzeit & Karin Holm-Müller & Wolfgang Britz, 2012. "Ökonomische Bewertung des Erneuerbare Energien Gesetzes zur Förderung von Biogas," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 13(3), pages 251-265, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2500-:d:226832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.