IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7042-d295978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Segmentation of New Gateway Airports Incorporating Passengers’ Curiosity

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Lu

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Cheng Lv

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Zhongzhen Yang

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315800, China)

  • Mark Hansen

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

Abstract

To serve more markets for supporting its sustainable development, Zhuhai airport tends to act as a new gateway by providing an air–bridge–air path that links its domestic network to the international air routes of Hong Kong Airport, through surface transportation via the Hongkong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. In order to identify the target passengers using the new gateway service, this paper proposes a market segmentation approach which incorporates the heterogeneity among passengers in the choice of the air–bridge–air route and explicitly incorporates people’s curiosity about the new service. A latent class choice model incorporating passengers’ curiosity is developed to identify the market segments of the new gateway service offered by Zhuhai Airport. The model is estimated using the stated preference data collected in 12 Chinese cities. The results indicate that people who have a high level of curiosity and/or are price sensitive prefer to use the new gateway service. Meanwhile, some segment-specific strategies of improving the new gateway service are proposed for the sustainable development of domestic airports which have the desire to cooperate with nearby hubs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Lu & Cheng Lv & Zhongzhen Yang & Mark Hansen, 2019. "Market Segmentation of New Gateway Airports Incorporating Passengers’ Curiosity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7042-:d:295978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Krizek, 2003. "Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 387-410, November.
    2. Lee, Joon-Kyu & Yoo, Kwang-Eui & Song, Ki-Han, 2016. "A study on travelers' transport mode choice behavior using the mixed logit model: A case study of the Seoul-Jeju route," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(PB), pages 131-137.
    3. Loo, Becky P.Y., 2008. "Passengers’ airport choice within multi-airport regions (MARs): some insights from a stated preference survey at Hong Kong International Airport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 117-125.
    4. Kuljanin, Jovana & Kalić, Milica, 2015. "Exploring characteristics of passengers using traditional and low-cost airlines: A case study of Belgrade Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 12-18.
    5. Psaraki, Voula & Abacoumkin, Costas, 2002. "Access mode choice for relocated airports: the new Athens International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 89-98.
    6. Vij, Akshay & Walker, Joan L., 2014. "Preference endogeneity in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 90-105.
    7. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios A. & Nikoleris, Anastasios, 2008. "Passengers' willingness to pay for airport ground access time savings," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1274-1282, December.
    8. Prillwitz, Jan & Barr, Stewart, 2011. "Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1590-1600.
    9. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2003. "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 681-698, September.
    10. Seelhorst, Michael & Liu, Yi, 2015. "Latent air travel preferences: Understanding the role of frequent flyer programs on itinerary choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-61.
    11. Hill, Krista M. & Fombelle, Paul W. & Sirianni, Nancy J., 2016. "Shopping under the influence of curiosity: How retailers use mystery to drive purchase motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1028-1034.
    12. Chen, Hsi-Tien & Chao, Ching-Cheng, 2015. "Airline choice by passengers from Taiwan and China: A case study of outgoing passengers from Kaohsiung International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 53-63.
    13. Teichert, Thorsten & Shehu, Edlira & von Wartburg, Iwan, 2008. "Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 227-242, January.
    14. Koster, Paul & Kroes, Eric & Verhoef, Erik, 2011. "Travel time variability and airport accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1545-1559.
    15. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Wang, Wei-Chung & Fu, Chiang, 2012. "Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 545-554.
    16. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M., 2011. "Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 63-79, January.
    17. Zhang, Junyi & Kuwano, Masashi & Lee, Backjin & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2009. "Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 230-250, February.
    18. Bao, Danwen & Hua, Songyi & Gu, Jiayu, 2016. "Relevance of airport accessibility and airport competition," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 52-60.
    19. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2008. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/532, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Lai, Shan-Ching, 2010. "Latent class models of international air carrier choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 211-221, March.
    21. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    22. Chandra R. Bhat, 1997. "An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 34-48, February.
    23. Jung, Se-Yeon & Yoo, Kwang-Eui, 2016. "A study on passengers' airport choice behavior using hybrid choice model: A case study of Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 70-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    2. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    3. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Wang, Wei-Chung & Fu, Chiang, 2012. "Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 545-554.
    4. Hurtubia, Ricardo & Nguyen, My Hang & Glerum, Aurélie & Bierlaire, Michel, 2014. "Integrating psychometric indicators in latent class choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 135-146.
    5. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    6. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Accommodating preference heterogeneity in commuting mode choice: an empirical investigation in Shaoxing, China," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 434-448, May.
    7. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
    8. Koo, Tay T.R. & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Park, Jin-Woo & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2017. "The effect of enhanced international air access on the demand for peripheral tourism destinations: Evidence from air itinerary choice behaviour of Korean visitors to Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 116-129.
    9. Yanbin Long & Peter Belobaba, 2024. "Airline revenue management with segmented continuous pricing: methods and competitive effects," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 14-27, February.
    10. Zhiwei Liu & Jianrong Liu, 2023. "Shared Autonomous Vehicles as Last-Mile Public Transport of Metro Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Zaidan, Esmat & Abulibdeh, Ammar, 2018. "Modeling ground access mode choice behavior for Hamad International Airport in the 2022 FIFA World Cup city, Doha, Qatar," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 32-45.
    12. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2013. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity in railway passenger choice models based on internet booking data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2018. "Taste heterogeneity as an alternative form of endogeneity bias: Investigating the attitude-moderated effects of built environment and socio-demographics on vehicle ownership using latent class modelin," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 130-150.
    15. Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea, 2020. "Mixing distributions of tastes with a Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) kernel: Formulation and performance analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-23.
    16. Xiaoqian Sun & Sebastian Wandelt & Mark Hansen, 2020. "Airport Road Access at Planet Scale using Population Grid and Openstreetmap," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-299, March.
    17. Munoz, Claudia & Laniado, Henry, 2021. "Airline choice model for international round-trip flights: The role of travelers’ satisfaction and personality traits," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Gunay, Gurkan & Gokasar, Ilgin, 2021. "Market segmentation analysis for airport access mode choice modeling with mixed logit," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Tomás Rossetti & Verónica Saud & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2019. "I want to ride it where I like: measuring design preferences in cycling infrastructure," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 697-718, June.
    20. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2014. "A latent class choice based model system for railway optimal pricing and seat allocation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7042-:d:295978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.