IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6807-d292645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Students Have Conflicts in Peer Assessment? An Empirical Study of an Online Peer Assessment Community

Author

Listed:
  • Yanqing Wang

    (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Zheng Zong

    (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

Abstract

This study highlights the issues in the process of peer assessment in an online environment. As an interactive learning platform, peer assessment will likely lead to conflicts among students, which will hinder the sustainability of peer assessment learning environments. It is still unclear about the particular factors that influence and cause the behavioral conflicts which arise within learning groups and learning environments. To overcome this issue, the current study explores why peer assessment could trigger conflict over a student’s task. The results of a negative binomial regression model with user fixed effects indicate that student’s knowledge self-efficacy, cognitive diversity of general knowledge, and network density have a positive impact on task conflict. Interactive experience and cognition diversity of specific knowledge are not powerful motivations for task conflict in the peer assessment. The findings of this study may be helpful for educators in understanding why students have task conflict in a specific learning environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanqing Wang & Zheng Zong, 2019. "Why Students Have Conflicts in Peer Assessment? An Empirical Study of an Online Peer Assessment Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6807-:d:292645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stock, Ruth, 2004. "Drivers of Team Performance: What Do We Know and What Have We Still to Learn?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35551, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Stock, Ruth, 2004. "Drivers of Team Performance: What Do We Know and What Have We Still to Learn?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60487, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Ruth Stock, 2004. "Drivers Of Team Performance: What Do We Know And What Have We Still To Learn?," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 56(3), pages 274-306, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Gaitanides & Ruth Stock, 2004. "Interorganisationale Teams: Transaktionskostentheoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde zum Teamerfolg," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 436-451, August.
    2. Karagiannidis, Iordanis, 2010. "Management team structure and mutual fund performance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 197-211, April.
    3. Timothy J. CRADER & Stephen M. BROWN, 2013. "Team Selling And Customer Satisfaction In The Mission Critical Sector: A Case Study Of Eyp Mission Critical Facilities Inc," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 248-254, November.
    4. Mamatzakis, Emmanuel & Xu, Bingrun, 2016. "Managerial attributes and equity mutual fund performance: evidence from china," MPRA Paper 76139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ruth Stock, 2005. "Kann Teamführung zu intensiv sein?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 33-52, February.
    6. Hao Shi, 2006. "L'évolution du "calcul économique en équipe" : un processus de légitimation des changements institutionnels en Chine," Working Papers 2006-4, Laboratoire Orléanais de Gestion - université d'Orléans.
    7. Janhonen, Minna & Johanson, Jan-Erik, 2011. "Role of knowledge conversion and social networks in team performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 217-225.
    8. Uschi Backes-Gellner & Stephan Veen, 2008. "The Impact of Workforce Age Heterogeneity on Company Productivity," Working Papers 0078, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU), revised Sep 2009.
    9. Andrea Lippi, 2016. "Does the Asset Manager's Nationality Influence the Occupational Pension Fund Performance?," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 176-196, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6807-:d:292645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.