IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5349-d271461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Support Vector Machine Methods to Reduce Passengers’ Resistance to Biometric E-Gates for Sustainable Airport Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Cheong Kim

    (SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea
    Korea Airports Corporation (KAC), Seoul 07505, Korea)

  • Francis Joseph Costello

    (SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

  • Kun Chang Lee

    (SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea
    Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea
    Creativity Science Research Institute (CSRI), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

Abstract

For the sake of maintaining sustainable airport operations, biometric e-gates security systems started receiving significant attention from managers of airports around the world. Therefore, how to reduce flight passengers’ perceived resistance to the biometric e-gates security system became much more important than ever. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to analyze the factors which contribute to passenger’s resistance to adopt biometric e-gate technology within the airport security setting. Our focus lies on exploring the effects that perceived risks and benefits as well as user characteristics and propagation mechanisms had on causing such resistance. With survey data from 339 airport users, a support vector machine (SVM) model was implemented to provide a tool for classifying resistance causes correctly, and csQCA (crisp set Qualitative Comparative Analysis) was implemented in order to understand the complex underlying causes. The results showed that the presence of perceived risks and the absence of perceived benefits were the main contributing factors, with propagation mechanisms also showing a significant effect on weak and strong resistance. This study is distinct in that it has attempted to explore innovation adoption through the lens of resistance and in doing so has uncovered important complex causation conditions that need to be considered before service quality can be enhanced within airports. This study’s implications should therefore help steer airport managers in the right direction towards maintaining service quality while implementing sustainable new technologies within their current airport security ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheong Kim & Francis Joseph Costello & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Integrating Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Support Vector Machine Methods to Reduce Passengers’ Resistance to Biometric E-Gates for Sustainable Airport Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5349-:d:271461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoqian Zu & Yongxiang Wu & Zhenduo Zhang & Lu Yu, 2019. "Prediction of Consumption Choices of Low-Income Groups in a Mixed-Income Community Using a Support Vector Machine Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Bearden, William O & Netemeyer, Richard G & Teel, Jesse E, 1989. "Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(4), pages 473-481, March.
    3. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    4. Maria Mrówczyńska & Małgorzata Sztubecka & Marta Skiba & Anna Bazan-Krzywoszańska & Przemysław Bejga, 2019. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Tool Supporting Sustainable Development Local Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    5. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Oppewal, Harmen, 2012. "Predicting early adoption of successive video player generations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 558-569.
    6. Xiangqian Xu & Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Yuejin Tan & Tianjun Liao, 2018. "Sustainable Queuing-Network Design for Airport Security Based on the Monte Carlo Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Oyeniyi Akeem Alimi & Khmaies Ouahada & Adnan M. Abu-Mahfouz, 2019. "Real Time Security Assessment of the Power System Using a Hybrid Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Min-Wei Huang & Chih-Wen Chen & Wei-Chao Lin & Shih-Wen Ke & Chih-Fong Tsai, 2017. "SVM and SVM Ensembles in Breast Cancer Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Garrick Blalock & Vrinda Kadiyali & Daniel H. Simon, 2007. "The Impact of Post-9/11 Airport Security Measures on the Demand for Air Travel," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(4), pages 731-755.
    10. Jin-Woo Park & Young Kyung Ryu, 2019. "Investigating the Effects of Airport Servicescape on Airport Users’ Behavioral Intentions: A Case Study of Incheon International Airport Terminal 2 (T2)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Chang Hee Yoon & Francis Joseph Costello & Cheong Kim, 2019. "Assisting Sustainable Entrepreneurial Activities Through the Analysis of Mobile IT Services’ Success and Failure Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. da Silva, Francisco Gildemir Ferreira & Falcão, Viviane Adriano & Domingos, Maria Cecília de Farias & Negri, Nathane Ana Rosa, 2022. "Analysis of the generalized use of logit models in simulating changes in decision attributes at the airport check-in," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Jingjing Hao & Ling Zhang & Xiaofeng Ji & Xiaolong Wu & Lan Liu, 2020. "Investigating the Accessibility between Civil Airports and Tourist Locations in Tourist Cities in Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Cheong Kim & Francis Joseph Costello & Kun Chang Lee & Yuan Li & Chenyao Li, 2019. "Predicting Factors Affecting Adolescent Obesity Using General Bayesian Network and What-If Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Cheong Kim & Kun Chang Lee & Francis Joseph Costello, 2020. "The Intention of Passengers towards Repeat Use of Biometric Security for Sustainable Airport Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Cheng-Hong Yang & Borcy Lee & Pey-Huah Jou & Yu-Fang Chung & Yu-Da Lin, 2023. "Analysis and Forecasting of International Airport Traffic Volume," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelsen, Carl Christian & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Switching from fossil fuel to renewables in residential heating systems: An empirical study of homeowners' decisions in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 95-105.
    2. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Ruvio, Ayalla A. & Shoham, Aviv, 2016. "Consumer arrogance: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3989-3997.
    4. Bangwool Han & Minho Kim, 2019. "Hofstede’s Collectivistic Values and Sustainable Growth of Online Group Buying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Angeliki Kitsiou & Charikleia Despotidi & Christos Kalloniatis & Stefanos Gritzalis, 2022. "The Role of Users’ Demographic and Social Attributes for Accepting Biometric Systems: A Greek Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    7. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Liselot Hudders & Mario Pandelaere, 2012. "The Silver Lining of Materialism: The Impact of Luxury Consumption on Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 411-437, June.
    9. Mario Schaarschmidt & Dirk Homscheid & Thomas Kilian, 2019. "Application Developer Engagement In Open Software Platforms: An Empirical Study Of Apple Ios And Google Android Developers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-33, May.
    10. Martijn G. de Jong & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2009. "A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 674-689, 07-08.
    11. Kee-Young Kwahk & Byoungsoo Kim, 2017. "Effects of social media on consumers’ purchase decisions: evidence from Taobao," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 803-829, December.
    12. Gentina, Élodie & Chandon, Jean-Louis, 2013. "Adolescent shopping behaviour: Different assimilation and individuation needs in France and the United States," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 609-616.
    13. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    14. Jolanta Tkaczyk, 2015. "Consumer Susceptibility to Social Influence and Tendency to Generate a Positive or Negative Message in Word of Mouth Communication," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 21-28, July.
    15. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska, 2020. "The Impact of the Process of Academic Education on Differences in Landscape Perception between the Students of Environmental Engineering and Civil Engineering," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.
    16. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Adit Jha, 2021. "Impact of Susceptibility of Interpersonal Influence, and Vanity Aspects on Luxury Brand Consumption," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 10(2), pages 222-237, December.
    18. Cristian Morosan, 2021. "An affective approach to modelling intentions to use technologies for social distancing in hotels," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 549-573, December.
    19. Fong, Cher-Min & Chang, Hsing-Hua Stella & Lin, Mong-Ching & Chen, I-Hung, 2022. "Reexamining emerging market animosity toward western developed countries: A social dilemma in physical retailing consumption under normative influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Abhigyan Sarkar & Juhi Gahlot Sarkar & S. Sreejesh & M. R. Anusree & Bikramjit Rishi, 2020. "You are so embarrassing, still, I hate you less! Investigating consumers’ brand embarrassment and brand hate," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 93-107, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5349-:d:271461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.