IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2599-d159680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-Based Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Dzimińska

    (Management Department, University of Social Sciences, 9 Sienkiewicza Street, 90-113 Łódź, Poland)

  • Justyna Fijałkowska

    (Finance and Accounting Department, University of Social Sciences, 9 Sienkiewicza Street, 90-113 Łódź, Poland)

  • Łukasz Sułkowski

    (HEI Management Department, Jagiellonian University, 4 Prof. Stanisław Łojasiewicz Street, 30-348 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in societies as they enhance the sustainable development of nations. In a context of increasing competition and financial difficulties in higher education institutions, the loyalty of students, faculty and administration staff as well as institutional reputation are key factors for survival and success. They are built upon trust and high quality of services rendered by HEIs. The intentional development of trust serves the purpose of enhancing the quality culture in higher education. The concept of quality culture has become a natural successor of quality management and quality assurance in universities presenting a new perspective for viewing quality at HEIs—as a combination of structural and managerial with cultural and psychological components. This paper provides an elaboration of a novel Trust-Based Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Institutions which presents the perceived interconnections between trust and quality culture at HEIs. It can form a source for an inquiry process at HEIs, thus contributing to better contextual diagnosis of the stage where HEI is in the process of building the quality culture based on trust. The findings of this study are important in better understanding the quality culture development in HEIs that is based on trust, loyalty and reputation. It may have an impact on the decision-making processes concerning HEIs’ management. The proposed model contributes to the need for greater clarity, ordering and systematization of the role of trust in the processes of quality culture development.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Dzimińska & Justyna Fijałkowska & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2018. "Trust-Based Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2599-:d:159680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seunghwan Myeong & Yongmin Kwon & Hyungjun Seo, 2014. "Sustainable E-Governance: The Relationship among Trust, Digital Divide, and E-Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. S. Hansen & Benjamin Dunford & Alan Boss & R. Boss & Ingo Angermeier, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Benefits of Employee Trust: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 29-45, August.
    3. Amit K. Ghosh & Thomas W. Whipple & Glenn A. Bryan, 2001. "Student Trust and its Antecedents in Higher Education," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 322-340, May.
    4. Brenkert, George G., 1998. "Trust, Morality and International Business," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 293-317, April.
    5. Stephen P. Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Isabel Vidal & Tony Kinder, 2014. "A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 165-172, February.
    6. Yoon Jik Cho & Hanjun Park, 2011. "Exploring the Relationships Among Trust, Employee Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 551-573, May.
    7. Soule, Edward, 1998. "Trust And Managerial Responsibility," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 249-272, April.
    8. Trow, Martin, 1996. "Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt6q21h265, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    9. Thomas Osburg, 2017. "Sustainability in a Digital World Needs Trust," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Thomas Osburg & Christiane Lohrmann (ed.), Sustainability in a Digital World, pages 3-19, Springer.
    10. Kurt T. Dirks & Donald L. Ferrin, 2001. "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 450-467, August.
    11. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Balaji, M.S. & Roy, Sanjit Kumar & Sadeque, Saalem, 2016. "Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3023-3032.
    13. J. Madariaga & C. Valor, 2007. "Stakeholders Management Systems: Empirical Insights from Relationship Marketing and Market Orientation Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 425-439, April.
    14. Patricia Elgoibar & Martin Euwema & Lourdes Munduate, 2016. "Building Trust and constructive conflict management in organizations," Post-Print hal-01807127, HAL.
    15. Husted, Bryan W., 1998. "The Ethical Limits of Trust in Business Relations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 233-248, April.
    16. Dimitri Van Maele & Mieke Van Houtte, 2011. "The Quality of School Life: Teacher-Student Trust Relationships and the Organizational School Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 85-100, January.
    17. Yongrok Choi & Do Quynh Mai, 2018. "The Sustainable Role of the E-Trust in the B2C E-Commerce of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Hanne Nørreklit & Morten Raffnsøe-Møller & Falconer Mitchell, 2016. "A pragmatic constructivist approach to accounting practice and research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 266-277, August.
    19. Sergio W. Carvalho & Márcio de Oliveira Mota, 2010. "The role of trust in creating value and student loyalty in relational exchanges between higher education institutions and their students," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 145-165, June.
    20. Patricia Elgoibar & Martin Euwema & Lourdes Munduate, 2016. "Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations," Post-Print hal-01807064, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinghua Zhu & Hang Yin & Junjun Liu & Kee‐hung Lai, 2014. "How is Employee Perception of Organizational Efforts in Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Their Satisfaction and Loyalty Towards Developing Harmonious Society in Chinese Enterprises?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 28-40, January.
    2. Nematollah Shiri & Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 605-620, March.
    3. Durotimi Amos Dada & Dare Joseph Enimola & Ayuba Sule, 2022. "Constructive Conflicts And Organizational-Learning In Small And Medium Firms In Kogi State," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 77-90, September.
    4. Francesco Rosati & Roberta Costa & Armando Calabrese & Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, 2018. "Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1306-1319, November.
    5. Louise Tourigny & Jian Han & Vishwanath V. Baba & Polly Pan, 2019. "Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Multilevel Study of Their Effects on Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 427-440, August.
    6. Charlotte K. Marx & Mareike Reimann & Martin Diewald, 2021. "Do Work–Life Measures Really Matter? The Impact of Flexible Working Hours and Home-Based Teleworking in Preventing Voluntary Employee Exits," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Dimple Dhiman & Himani Sharma, 2021. "Does Organizational Trust Mediate the CSR–OCB Relationship? A PLS-SEM Analysis," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(4), pages 223-235, December.
    8. Rama Shankar Yadav & Sanket Sunand Dash & Shreyashi Chakraborty & Manoj Kumar, 2018. "Perceived CSR and Corporate Reputation: The Mediating Role of Employee Trust," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 43(3), pages 139-151, September.
    9. Patricia Elgoibar & Elio Shijaku, 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Marc Cohen & John Dienhart, 2013. "Moral and Amoral Conceptions of Trust, with an Application in Organizational Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Erica Romero Pender & Patricia Elgoibar & Lourdes Munduate & Ana Belén García & Martin C Euwema, 2018. "Improving social dialogue: What employers expect from employee representatives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 169-189, June.
    12. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Mª de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz & Mª Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Orientation Toward Key Non-family Stakeholders and Economic Performance in Family Firms: The Role of Family Identification with the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 329-345, May.
    14. Abdullah Almuqrin & Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdulaziz Alomran & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2023. "Information System Success for Organizational Sustainability: Exploring the Public Institutions in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Kolawole Iyiola & Husam Rjoub, 2020. "Using Conflict Management in Improving Owners and Contractors Relationship Quality in the Construction Industry: The Mediation Role of Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    16. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2018. "Investigating the Links of Interpersonal Trust in Telecommunications Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2021. "The Role of Employee Relations in Shaping Job Satisfaction as an Element Promoting Positive Mental Health at Work in the Era of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Ivan Hilliard, 2013. "Responsible Management, Incentive Systems, and Productivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 365-377, December.
    19. David Benjamin Billedeau & Jeffrey Wilson & Naima Samuel, 2022. "From Responsibility to Requirement: COVID, Cars, and the Future of Corporate Social Responsibility in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Victor Hiller & Natacha Raffin, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and workers’ motivation at the industry equilibrium," Post-Print hal-02366298, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2599-:d:159680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.