IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2211-d154971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design for Manufacture and Assembly Oriented Design Approach to a Curtain Wall System: A Case Study of a Commercial Building in Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Chen

    (Department of Real Estate and Construction, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Weisheng Lu

    (Department of Real Estate and Construction, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

A curtain wall system (CWS) is one of the most popular elements for the external walls of large, multistory buildings. Applying the design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) principles to the design of a CWS aims to increase the quality, sustainability, and cost efficiency associated with the assembly of the CWS. Studies reporting a DfMA-oriented design approach to CWSs are extremely rare. This paper reports a case study of a successful application of a DfMA-oriented design approach to a CWS in a commercial building in Wuhan, China. The case study provides valuable information about how DfMA could be applied to the construction industry. Through interviews with key project participants and on-site observations, the benefits of a DfMA-oriented CWS design were revealed, including decreased material cost and waste, reduced on-site assembly time, and improved quality and aesthetic performance of the CWS. It was also found that an operative multidisciplinary team underpinned the success of DfMA application in the case project, which, however, might be held back by the absence of any use of digital, parametric design technologies during the design process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Chen & Weisheng Lu, 2018. "Design for Manufacture and Assembly Oriented Design Approach to a Curtain Wall System: A Case Study of a Commercial Building in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2211-:d:154971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myunghwan Oh & Sungho Tae & Sangkun Hwang, 2018. "Analysis of Heating and Cooling Loads of Electrochromic Glazing in High-Rise Residential Buildings in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Chimay Anumba & Nosa Evbuomwan, 1997. "Concurrent engineering in design-build projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 271-281.
    3. Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    4. Patrick Lam & Franky Wong, 2009. "Improving building project performance: how buildability benchmarking can help," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 41-52.
    5. WoonSeong Jeong & Kee Han Kim, 2016. "A Performance Evaluation of the BIM-Based Object-Oriented Physical Modeling Technique for Building Thermal Simulations: A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Robert Gerth & Albert Boqvist & Marcus Bjelkemyr & Bengt Lindberg, 2013. "Design for construction: utilizing production experiences in development," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 135-150, February.
    7. Stephen Fox & Laurence Marsh & Graham Cockerham, 2001. "Design for manufacture: A strategy for successful application to buildings," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 493-502.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenmin Yuan & Guodong Ni & Linxiu Wang & Yaning Qiao & Chengshuang Sun & Na Xu & Wenshun Wang, 2020. "Research on the Barrier Analysis and Strength Measurement of a Prefabricated Building Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Dariel López-López & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Juan Gavilanes & Ferran Ventura-Blanch & Ángela Barrios-Padura & Carmen Díaz-López, 2023. "A Study on the Parametric Design Parameters That Influence Environmental Ergonomics and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Hosang Hyun & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2022. "Integrated Off-Site Construction Design Process including DfMA Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Craig Langston & Weiwei Zhang, 2021. "DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Rabia Charef, 2022. "Is Circular Economy for the Built Environment a Myth or a Real Opportunity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-5, December.
    6. Seoyoung Jung & Jungho Yu, 2022. "Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) Checklists for Off-Site Construction (OSC) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig Langston & Weiwei Zhang, 2021. "DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Beerepoot, Milou & Beerepoot, Niels, 2007. "Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4812-4825, October.
    3. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    4. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    5. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Krarti, Moncef, 2023. "Optimal optical properties for smart glazed windows applied to residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    7. Antonelli, Cristiano & Gehringer, Agnieszka, 2015. "Knowledge externalities and demand pull: The European evidence," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 608-631.
    8. Álvarez Cuccia, Sabrina, 2020. "Analysis of the role of financial and operational diversification on the economic performance of Catalan construction businesses (2005-2016)," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 14(1), pages 54-70.
    9. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    10. Marija Mosurović Ružičić & Mirjana Miletić & Marina Dobrota, 2021. "Does a National Innovation System Encourage Sustainability? Lessons from the Construction Industry in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Butzin, Anna & Rehfeld, Dieter, 2008. "Innovationsbiographien in der Bauwirtschaft," Forschung Aktuell 10/2008, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    12. Rossella Marmo & Maurizio Nicolella & Francesco Polverino & Andrej Tibaut, 2019. "A Methodology for a Performance Information Model to Support Facility Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Oesterreich, Thuy Duong & Teuteberg, Frank, 2019. "Behind the scenes: Understanding the socio-technical barriers to BIM adoption through the theoretical lens of information systems research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 413-431.
    14. Aslam, Muhammad Shakeel & O’Reilly, Dermot & Shah, Uzair, 2023. "Taking the rough with the smooth: A qualitative inquiry into social and cultural practices of knowledge-sharing work in international consultancy alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    15. Gabriela Gutierrez-Huerter O & Stefan Gold & Alexander Trautrims, 2023. "Change in Rhetoric but not in Action? Framing of the Ethical Issue of Modern Slavery in a UK Sector at High Risk of Labor Exploitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 35-58, January.
    16. Daniella Troje & Pernilla Gluch, 2020. "Beyond Policies and Social Washing: How Social Procurement Unfolds in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Francisco Brahm & Jorge Tarzijan, 2016. "Relational Contracts and Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Impact of Expected Future Business Volume on the Make-or-Buy Decision," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 48-67, July.
    18. Li Liu & Xuerong Wang & Zhaohan Sheng, 2012. "Achieving ambidexterity in large, complex engineering projects: a case study of the Sutong Bridge project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 399-409, March.
    19. Chambers, Jonathan & Hollmuller, Pierre & Bouvard, Olivia & Schueler, Andreas & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis & Azar, Elie & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "Evaluating the electricity saving potential of electrochromic glazing for cooling and lighting at the scale of the Swiss non-residential national building stock using a Monte Carlo model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 136-147.
    20. Holmen, Elsebeth & Pedersen, Ann-Charlott & Torvatn, Tim, 2005. "Building relationships for technological innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1240-1250, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2211-:d:154971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.