IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1314-d142948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination in International Manufacturing: The Role of Competitive Priorities and the Focus of Globally Dispersed Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Sayem

    (Department of Organization Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28006 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Andreas Feldmann

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Miguel Ortega-Mier

    (Department of Organization Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

In this era of globalization, network integration has received great attention, as it certainly has implications for the competitiveness in international manufacturing. A key issue in integration is to coordinate activities of dispersed facilities in a way to align the target of locating abroad and the priorities to be competitive. This study explores and clarifies the effect of competitive priority and focus of dispersed facilities on coordinating the activities in intra-firm network manufacturing. Based on a multiple case study involving four different companies manufacturing in globally dispersed facilities, the results confirm that both competitive priorities and specific focus of global manufacturing are important for selecting mechanisms to coordinate overseas facilities, with the competitive priorities ‘quality’ and ‘flexibility’ being the more important. Furthermore, the findings reveal that companies place emphasis on informal mechanisms to coordinate the low-cost focused facilities. In turn, the importance of formal mechanisms seems equal for coordinating both low-cost focused facilities and those focused on capturing a local market. Finally, the findings of this paper suggest that elements of competitive priority, as well as the focus of dispersed facilities, should be considered towards making the choice for mechanisms of coordination. The findings bear important implications for the effective coordination of activities in international manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Sayem & Andreas Feldmann & Miguel Ortega-Mier, 2018. "Coordination in International Manufacturing: The Role of Competitive Priorities and the Focus of Globally Dispersed Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1314-:d:142948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golini, Ruggero & Longoni, Annachiara & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2014. "Developing sustainability in global manufacturing networks: The role of site competence on sustainability performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 448-459.
    2. Chen, Lujie & Olhager, Jan & Tang, Ou, 2014. "Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 154-163.
    3. Jon I Martinez & J Carlos Jarillo, 1991. "Coordination Demands of International Strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(3), pages 429-444, September.
    4. Jon I Martinez & J Carlos Jarillo, 1989. "The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 20(3), pages 489-514, September.
    5. Thomas Friedli & Andreas Mundt & Stefan Thomas, 2014. "Strategic Management of Global Manufacturing Networks," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-34185-4, December.
    6. Rudberg, Martin & Martin West, B., 2008. "Global operations strategy: Coordinating manufacturing networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 91-106, February.
    7. Rudberg, Martin & Olhager, Jan, 2003. "Manufacturing networks and supply chains: an operations strategy perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-39, February.
    8. Bergek, Anna & Bruzelius, Maria, 2010. "Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1321-1334, December.
    9. Tom J. M. Mom & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 812-828, August.
    10. Frank Jacob & Gernot Strube, 2008. "Why Go Global? The Multinational Imperative," Springer Books, in: Eberhard Abele & Tobias Meyer & Ulrich Näher & Gernot Strube & Richard Sykes (ed.), Global Production, chapter 1, pages 2-33, Springer.
    11. Dunning, John H., 2000. "The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 163-190, April.
    12. Dangayach, G. S. & Deshmukh, S. G., 2003. "Evidence of manufacturing strategies in Indian industry: a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 279-298, March.
    13. Frank L DuBois & Brian Toyne & Michael D Oliff, 1993. "International Manufacturing Strategies of U.S. Multinationals: A Conceptual Framework Based on a Four-Industry Study," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 24(2), pages 307-333, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viktorija Badasjane & Anna Granlund & Mats Ahlskog & Jessica Bruch, 2022. "Coordination of Digital Transformation in International Manufacturing Networks—Challenges and Coping Mechanisms from an Organizational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Cheng, Yang & Farooq, Sami, 2018. "The role of plants in manufacturing networks: A revisit and extension," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 15-32.
    3. Justin J. P. Jansen & Michiel P. Tempelaar & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 797-811, August.
    4. José R. Torre & José Paulo Esperança & Jon I. Martínez, 2011. "Organizational Responses to Regional Integration Among MNEs in Latin America," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 241-267, April.
    5. Lee, Jeoung Yul & MacMillan, Ian C., 2008. "Managerial knowledge-sharing in chaebols and its impact on the performance of their foreign subsidiaries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 533-545, October.
    6. Christopher Melin, 2011. "Le management de projets des firmes multinationales comme un mécanisme de coordination des relations siège-filiales," Post-Print hal-00690839, HAL.
    7. Maximilian Palmié & Marco Zeschky & Stephan Winterhalter & Philipp Walter Sauter & Naomi Haefner & Oliver Gassmann, 2016. "Coordination mechanisms for international innovation in SMEs: effects on time-to-market and R&D task complexity as a moderator," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 273-294, February.
    8. Harzing, Anne-Wil, 2001. "Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: the role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 366-379, January.
    9. Zeng, Rong & Grøgaard, Birgitte & Steel, Piers, 2018. "Complements or substitutes? A meta-analysis of the role of integration mechanisms for knowledge transfer in the MNE network," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 415-432.
    10. Marina Papanastassiou & Robert Pearce & Antonello Zanfei, 2020. "Changing perspectives on the internationalization of R&D and innovation by multinational enterprises: A review of the literature," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(4), pages 623-664, June.
    11. Buckley, Peter J. & Hashai, Niron, 2005. "Firm configuration and internationalisation: A model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 655-675, December.
    12. Yeniyurt, Sengun & Tamer Cavusgil, S. & Hult, G. Tomas M., 2005. "A global market advantage framework: the role of global market knowledge competencies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Miltenburg, John, 2015. "Changing a multidomestic production network to a global function network: North America Heinz ketchup from 1960 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 267-278.
    14. Liu, Ting & Li, Xizhuo, 2022. "How Do MNCs Conduct Local Technological Innovation in a Host Country? An Examination From Subsidiaries' Perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    15. Goodall, Keith & Roberts, John, 2003. "Only connect: teamwork in the multinational," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 150-164, May.
    16. Rodríguez Monroy, Carlos & Vilana Arto, José Ramón, 2010. "Analysis of global manufacturing virtual networks in the aeronautical industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 314-323, August.
    17. Jaussaud, Jacques & Schaaper, Johannes, 2006. "Control mechanisms of their subsidiaries by multinational firms: A multidimensional perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 23-45, March.
    18. John Miltenburg, 2018. "Supply chains for iilicit products: Case study of the global opiate production networks," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1423871-142, January.
    19. Patrick Regnér & Udo Zander, 2011. "Knowledge and Strategy Creation in Multinational Companies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 821-850, December.
    20. Morris A. Cohen & Suman Mallik, 1997. "Global Supply Chains: Research And Applications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 193-210, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1314-:d:142948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.