IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i11p204-d953521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quality of Reserve Risk Calculation Models under Solvency II and IFRS 17

Author

Listed:
  • N. Miklós Arató

    (Department of Probability Theory and Statistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
    Department of Mathematics and Computational Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9026 Győr, Hungary
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • László Martinek

    (Department of Probability Theory and Statistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

We analyse four stochastic claims reserving methods in terms of their capability to estimate reserve risk and how successful they are at predicting distributions and VaRs of claim developments in particular. Both actual data and hypothetical claim triangles support our results. The appropriateness of the Solvency II risk margin on a one-year horizon and of the IFRS 17 risk adjustment in the long run largely vary by the chosen risk model. Despite the fact that IFRS 17 does not uniquely prescribe the metric for risk adjustment, we expect that VaR will be widely applied by insurance firms. Overall, actual data suggest that VaRs are predominantly underestimated by the models. Nevertheless, the 99.5 % -VaRs under Solvency II are mostly sufficient on a 10-year-horizon to cover liabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Miklós Arató & László Martinek, 2022. "The Quality of Reserve Risk Calculation Models under Solvency II and IFRS 17," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:204-:d:953521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/11/204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/11/204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. England, P. D. & Verrall, R. J., 2006. "Predictive Distributions of Outstanding Liabilities in General Insurance," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 221-270, September.
    2. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2017. "Beyond the Tweedie Reserving Model: The Collective Approach to Loss Development," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2017038, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Michel Denuit & Julien Trufin, 2017. "Beyond the Tweedie Reserving Model: The Collective Approach to Loss Development," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 611-619, October.
    4. Tilmann Gneiting & Fadoua Balabdaoui & Adrian E. Raftery, 2007. "Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 243-268, April.
    5. Taylor, G. C. & Ashe, F. R., 1983. "Second moments of estimates of outstanding claims," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 37-61, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanez, Juan Sebastian & Pigeon, Mathieu, 2021. "Micro-level parametric duration-frequency-severity modeling for outstanding claim payments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 106-119.
    2. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Robben, Jens & Antonio, Katrien, 2022. "A hierarchical reserving model for reported non-life insurance claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 158-184.
    3. Boj del Val, Eva & Costa Cor, Teresa, 2017. "Provisions for claims outstanding, incurred but not reported, with generalized linear models: prediction error formulated according to calendar year," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    4. Gao, Guangyuan & Meng, Shengwang & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 572-586.
    5. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J. & Wüthrich, M.V., 2019. "On the lifetime and one-year views of reserve risk, with application to IFRS 17 and Solvency II risk margins," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 74-88.
    6. Verdonck, T. & Debruyne, M., 2011. "The influence of individual claims on the chain-ladder estimates: Analysis and diagnostic tool," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 85-98, January.
    7. England, Peter, 2002. "Addendum to "Analytic and bootstrap estimates of prediction errors in claims reserving"," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 461-466, December.
    8. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Maneesoonthorn, Worapree & Martin, Gael M. & Forbes, Catherine S. & Grose, Simone D., 2012. "Probabilistic forecasts of volatility and its risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 217-236.
    10. Warne, Anders, 2023. "DSGE model forecasting: rational expectations vs. adaptive learning," Working Paper Series 2768, European Central Bank.
    11. Lahiri, Kajal & Yang, Liu, 2013. "Forecasting Binary Outcomes," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1025-1106, Elsevier.
    12. Liu, Hui & Duan, Zhu & Chen, Chao, 2020. "Wind speed big data forecasting using time-variant multi-resolution ensemble model with clustering auto-encoder," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    13. Jenny Brynjarsdottir & Jonathan Hobbs & Amy Braverman & Lukas Mandrake, 2018. "Optimal Estimation Versus MCMC for $$\mathrm{{CO}}_{2}$$ CO 2 Retrievals," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(2), pages 297-316, June.
    14. Michael K. Adjemian & Valentina G. Bruno & Michel A. Robe, 2020. "Incorporating Uncertainty into USDA Commodity Price Forecasts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 696-712, March.
    15. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    16. Warne, Anders & Coenen, Günter & Christoffel, Kai, 2010. "Forecasting with DSGE models," Working Paper Series 1185, European Central Bank.
    17. Nowotarski, Jakub & Weron, Rafał, 2018. "Recent advances in electricity price forecasting: A review of probabilistic forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1548-1568.
    18. Tilmann Gneiting & Larissa Stanberry & Eric Grimit & Leonhard Held & Nicholas Johnson, 2008. "Rejoinder on: Assessing probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, with an application to ensemble predictions of surface winds," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 256-264, August.
    19. Daniel Cervone & Alex D’Amour & Luke Bornn & Kirk Goldsberry, 2016. "A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 585-599, April.
    20. Bijak Jakub & Alberts Isabel & Alho Juha & Bryant John & Buettner Thomas & Falkingham Jane & Forster Jonathan J. & Gerland Patrick & King Thomas & Onorante Luca & Keilman Nico & O’Hagan Anthony & Owen, 2015. "Letter to the Editor," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(4), pages 537-544, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:204-:d:953521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.