IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i6p632-d517996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Commerce Supply Chain Models under Altruistic Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyan Wang

    (School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
    School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Zhaoqing Yu

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Liang Shen

    (School of Public Finance and Taxation, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Wenquan Dong

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

Abstract

This paper reviews the decisions, coordination contract, and altruistic preference of an e-commerce supply chain (eSC) composed of a manufacturer and a third-party e-commerce platform (platform). The research derives optimal decisions in a decentralized model with altruistic preference; it is indicated that altruistic preference can help increase the sales price and sales service level. Although the platform’s altruistic preference is not beneficial to its own profits, it can help increase the manufacturer’s profits. Moreover, when the degree of altruistic preference is kept within a limit, the profit of the decentralized system is higher in a model with altruistic preferences, which indicates that altruistic preference can contribute toward maintaining a friendly, harmonious, and cooperative a relationship between the platform and manufacturers. Contrary to a traditional offline supply chain, where the sales price is the lowest in the centralized model, the sales price is highest in a centralized eSC model. In the proposed coordination contract, the platform with a certain degree of altruistic preference offers zero-commission sales service and charges a certain amount for a fixed professional service fee. The proposed contract is more applicable to products whose market demands are less affected by sales prices and more affected by the sales service level.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Wenquan Dong, 2021. "E-Commerce Supply Chain Models under Altruistic Preference," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:632-:d:517996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Jianhu & Hu, Xiaoqing & Tadikamalla, Pandu R. & Shang, Jennifer, 2017. "Flexible contract design for VMI supply chain with service-sensitive demand: Revenue-sharing and supplier subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 143-153.
    2. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    3. Shao, Jing & Yang, Hangjun & Xing, Xiaoqiang & Yang, Liu, 2016. "E-commerce and traffic congestion: An economic and policy analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-103.
    4. Xie, JiaPing & Liang, Ling & Liu, LuHao & Ieromonachou, Petros, 2017. "Coordination contracts of dual-channel with cooperation advertising in closed-loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 528-538.
    5. Zhang, Jun & Wang, Xuping & Huang, Kai, 2018. "On-line scheduling of order picking and delivery with multiple zones and limited vehicle capacity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 104-115.
    6. Christoph H. Loch & Yaozhong Wu, 2008. "Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(11), pages 1835-1849, November.
    7. Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2006. "The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New Theories," Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, in: S. Kolm & Jean Mercier Ythier (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 615-691, Elsevier.
    8. Xiao, Tiaojun & (Junmin) Shi, Jim, 2016. "Pricing and supply priority in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 813-823.
    9. Bester, Helmut & Guth, Werner, 1998. "Is altruism evolutionarily stable?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 193-209, February.
    10. Kohler, Stefan, 2011. "Altruism and fairness in experimental decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 101-109.
    11. Yuyan Wang & Runjie Fan & Liang Shen & Mingzhou Jin, 2020. "Decisions and coordination of green e-commerce supply chain considering green manufacturer's fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7471-7489, December.
    12. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen, 2019. "Study on the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain with manufacturer fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2788-2808, May.
    13. Hong, Xianpei & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Wang, Wenjuan, 2015. "Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 12-22.
    14. Lan Luo & Jiong Sun, 2016. "New Product Design under Channel Acceptance: Brick-and-Mortar, Online-Exclusive, or Brick-and-Click," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(12), pages 2014-2034, December.
    15. Shen, Bin & Qian, Rongrong & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2017. "Selling luxury fashion online with social influences considerations: Demand changes and supply chain coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 89-99.
    16. Zhang, Jianqiang & Cao, Qingning & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Contract and product quality in platform selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 928-944.
    17. Panda, S. & Modak, N.M. & Sana, S.S. & Basu, M., 2015. "Pricing and replenishment policies in dual-channel supply chain under continuous unit cost decrease," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 913-929.
    18. Weihua Liu & Xiaoyu Yan & Wanying Wei & Dong Xie & Di Wang, 2018. "Altruistic preference for investment decisions in the logistics service supply chain," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 598-635.
    19. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    20. Juan Tang & Bang-Yi Li & Kevin W. Li & Zhi Liu & Jun Huang, 2020. "Pricing and warranty decisions in a two-period closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1688-1704, March.
    21. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Guo, Jinsen & Zhou, Wenhui, 2018. "Pricing/service strategies for a dual-channel supply chain with free riding and service-cost sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 198-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaotong Guo & Yong He, 2022. "Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Platform Service Supply Chains: A Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Jin, Mingzhou & Mao, Jiafu, 2021. "Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 910-925.
    2. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & Yuyan Wang & Xin Su & Hua Li & Rui Zhou, 2022. "Advertising Decisions of Platform Supply Chains Considering Network Externalities and Fairness Concerns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Rongyun Tang, 2021. "Decisions and Coordination in E-Commerce Supply Chain under Logistics Outsourcing and Altruistic Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Shen, Liang & Jin, Mingzhou, 2022. "Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    6. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Christian Thoeni & Simon Gaechter, 2011. "Peer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation," Discussion Papers 2011-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    8. Konrad, Kai A. & Morath, Florian, 2011. "Aspirations of the middle class: Voting on redistribution and status concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2011-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Ying Tang & Andrea Moro & Sandro Sozzo & Zhiyong Li, 2018. "Modelling trust evolution within small business lending relationships," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Xiao Zhou & Xiancong Wu, 2023. "Decisions for a Retailer-Led Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Altruistic Preference under Carbon Quota Policy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Pi, Zhenyang & Fang, Weiguo & Perera, Sandun C. & Zhang, Baofeng, 2022. "Enhancing the online buyer perception of consumer experience products in a dual-channel supply chain: A new role of free-riding," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    12. Guo Li & Hong Zheng & Mengqi Liu, 2020. "Reselling or drop shipping: Strategic analysis of E-commerce dual-channel structures," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 475-508, September.
    13. Qingfeng Meng & Zhen Li & Jianguo Du & Huimin Liu & Xiang Ding, 2019. "Negotiation for Time Optimization in Construction Projects with Competitive and Social Welfare Preferences," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, January.
    14. Chai Caichun & Zhu Hailong & Feng Zhangwei, 2018. "Evolutionary Stable Strategies for Supply Chains: Selfishness, Fairness, and Altruism," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 6(6), pages 532-551, December.
    15. Du, Shaofu & Nie, Tengfei & Chu, Chengbin & Yu, Yugang, 2014. "Reciprocal supply chain with intention," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 389-402.
    16. Đula, Ivan & Größler, Andreas, 2021. "Inequity aversion in dynamically complex supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 309-322.
    17. Wei Guangxing & Yao Yanling & Qin Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 283-294, June.
    18. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    19. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Yan Ge & Jing Li, 2018. "Different Dominant Models and Fairness Concern of E-Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, December.
    20. Yadong Shu & Ying Dai & Zujun Ma, 2019. "Pricing Decisions in Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Peer-Induced Fairness Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:632-:d:517996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.