IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1412-d1097483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Differential Pricing and Seat Allocation in High-Speed Railways for Multi-Class Demands: A Chinese Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wenliang Zhou

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Ziyu Zou

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Naijie Chai

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Guangming Xu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

There are many options for passengers choosing to travel by train. In order to maximize price revenue requests, railway companies must consider the differences between passenger types in the process of formulating ticket strategies. This study firstly subdivides passenger demand according to the latent class model based on Stated Preference (SP) and Revealed Preference (RP) survey data, then the passenger’s preference for train service attributes is identified. Based on the prospect theory, logit model and passenger flow transfer model, the final passenger flow assignment result is obtained. A differential pricing and seat allocation model aiming at maximizing price revenue is established, and a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm is designed to solve it. The results of the case show that the proposed model can increase revenue by 3.52% and by 1.02% compared with the result under single fares and without demand division.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenliang Zhou & Ziyu Zou & Naijie Chai & Guangming Xu, 2023. "Optimization of Differential Pricing and Seat Allocation in High-Speed Railways for Multi-Class Demands: A Chinese Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1412-:d:1097483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrich Schmidt & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2008. "Third-generation prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 203-223, June.
    2. van Vuuren, Daniel, 2002. "Optimal pricing in railway passenger transport: theory and practice in The Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 95-106, April.
    3. Jin Qin & Wenxuan Qu & Xuanke Wu & Yijia Zeng, 2019. "Differential Pricing Strategies of High Speed Railway Based on Prospect Theory: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2014. "A latent class choice based model system for railway optimal pricing and seat allocation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    5. Brons, Martijn & Pels, Eric & Nijkamp, Peter & Rietveld, Piet, 2002. "Price elasticities of demand for passenger air travel: a meta-analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 165-175.
    6. Nuzzolo, Agostino & Crisalli, Umberto & Gangemi, Francesca, 2000. "A behavioural choice model for the evaluation of railway supply and pricing policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 395-404, June.
    7. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2013. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity in railway passenger choice models based on internet booking data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Paulley, Neil & Balcombe, Richard & Mackett, Roger & Titheridge, Helena & Preston, John & Wardman, Mark & Shires, Jeremy & White, Peter, 2006. "The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-306, July.
    9. Basu, Debasis & Hunt, John Douglas, 2012. "Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: A stated preference approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1465-1476.
    10. Santos, Georgina & Maoh, Hanna & Potoglou, Dimitris & von Brunn, Thomas, 2013. "Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 127-137.
    11. Eldeeb, Gamal & Mohamed, Moataz, 2020. "Quantifying preference heterogeneity in transit service desired quality using a latent class choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 119-133.
    12. Ching-Cheng Chao & Taih-Cherng Lirn & Kuo-Chung Shang, 2013. "Market segmentation of airline cargo transport," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(15-16), pages 1672-1685, December.
    13. Drabas, Tomasz & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2013. "Modelling air carrier choices with a Segment Specific Cross Nested Logit model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 8-16.
    14. Piet Rietveld & Stefan van Woudenberg, 2007. "Second-best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to Fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 41(3), pages 363-385, September.
    15. Lin, Kyle Y. & Sibdari, Soheil Y., 2009. "Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 969-980, September.
    16. Jung, Se-Yeon & Yoo, Kwang-Eui, 2016. "A study on passengers' airport choice behavior using hybrid choice model: A case study of Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 70-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Qin & Yijia Zeng & Xia Yang & Yuxin He & Xuanke Wu & Wenxuan Qu, 2019. "Time-Dependent Pricing for High-Speed Railway in China Based on Revenue Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Zhan, Shuguang & Wong, S.C. & Lo, S.M., 2020. "Social equity-based timetabling and ticket pricing for high-speed railways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 165-186.
    3. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    4. Xueyi Guan & Jin Qin & Chenghui Mao & Wenliang Zhou, 2023. "A Literature Review of Railway Pricing Based on Revenue Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Robenek, Tomáš & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Maknoon, Yousef & de Lapparent, Matthieu & Bierlaire, Michel, 2018. "Train timetable design under elastic passenger demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 19-38.
    6. Ali Enes Dingil & Federico Rupi & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "An Integrative Review of Socio-Technical Factors Influencing Travel Decision-Making and Urban Transport Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Freund-Feinstein, Uzi & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2017. "An airline itinerary choice model that includes the option to delay the decision," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-78.
    8. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    9. Chiou, Yu-Chiun & Liu, Chia-Hsin, 2016. "Advance purchase behaviors of air passengers: A continuous logit model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 474-484.
    10. Varghese, Varun & Moniruzzaman, Md. & Chikaraishi, Makoto, 2023. "Environmental sustainability or equity in welfare? Analysing passenger flows of a mass rapid transit system with heterogeneous demand," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    12. Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Bucsky, Péter & Juhász, Mattias, 2022. "Long-term evidence on induced traffic: A case study on the relationship between road traffic and capacity of Budapest bridges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 244-257.
    14. Yun Wang & Xuedong Yan & Yu Zhou & Qingwan Xue, 2017. "Influencing Mechanism of Potential Factors on Passengers’ Long-Distance Travel Mode Choices Based on Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Munoz, Claudia & Laniado, Henry, 2021. "Airline choice model for international round-trip flights: The role of travelers’ satisfaction and personality traits," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Eldeeb, Gamal & Mohamed, Moataz & Páez, Antonio, 2021. "Built for active travel? Investigating the contextual effects of the built environment on transportation mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Escobari, Diego, 2017. "Airport, airline and departure time choice and substitution patterns: An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 198-210.
    18. Freund-Feinstei, Uzi & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2017. "Airline Itinerary Choice In A Dynamic Supply Environment: Results From A Stated Preference Survey," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 5(4), pages 400-424.
    19. Min Su & Weixin Luan & Liuyan Yuan & Rui Zhang & Zhenchao Zhang, 2019. "Sustainability Development of High-Speed Rail and Airline—Understanding Passengers’ Preferences: A Case Study of the Beijing–Shanghai Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Lunke, Erik B. & Fearnley, N. & Aarhaug, J., 2021. "Public transport competitiveness vs. the car: Impact of relative journey time and service attributes," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1412-:d:1097483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.