IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i16p3599-d1220985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of Mining Heritage Reuse in Public–Private-Partnership Mode Based on Improved Matter–Element Extension Model

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Yang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Shengyuan Zhuo

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Zitong Xu

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Jianhong Chen

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

With the development and utilization of resources, mineral-resource cities face the dilemma of resource depletion, the environmental restoration of mines, and industrial transformation. Reusing their mining heritage is a good way for these cities to change their mono-industrial structure and vigorously develop successor industries. Due to the complexity of reusing mining heritage, introducing the “Public–Private-Partnership” (PPP) mode can be a good solution to the problems of the government’s mining heritage reuse, such as large capital investment and a long construction-cycle time. To accurately classify the risk of reuse of mining heritage in the PPP mode, 26 indicators are selected to construct the evaluation index system of mining heritage reuse in the PPP mode based on five aspects: social capital-side, contractor-side, government-side, civilian-side, and the natural environment. The path coefficients of the structural equation model are used to calculate the weights of the indicators. The improved matter–element extension model is constructed to evaluate the reuse of mining heritage in the PPP mode. The Jiaozuo-Centennial Mining Heritage Park project is the object of research for applying the model. The results show that the risk evaluation index system combines the risk factors from the stakeholders’ perspective. The risk-evaluation model of the mining heritage reuse PPP project is constructed based on the combination of the improved matter–element extension model, the calculation of the asymmetric closeness, and the structural equation modeling method, which solves the drawbacks of the traditional model, such as the difficulty of determining the weights of the indicators, the incomplete scope of the material element domains, and the poor calculation of the comprehensive correlation degree. The case analysis shows that the risk level of the Jiaozuo-Centennial Mining Heritage Park project is Level II. This aligns with the actual situation and verifies the feasibility of the risk-evaluation model applied to the actual project. The research in this paper fills the gap in the risk model of mining heritage reuse in the PPP mode, enriches the theoretical system of risk evaluation of mining heritage reuse projects, and provides reference significance for similar mining heritage development projects in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Yang & Shengyuan Zhuo & Zitong Xu & Jianhong Chen, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Mining Heritage Reuse in Public–Private-Partnership Mode Based on Improved Matter–Element Extension Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3599-:d:1220985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freire-Lista, David M. & Becerra Becerra, J.E. & Simões de Abreu, Mila, 2022. "The historical quarry of pena (Vila Real, north of Portugal): Associated cultural heritage and reuse as a geotourism resource," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Xie, Philip Feifan, 2015. "A life cycle model of industrial heritage development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 141-154.
    3. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Manos, Basil & Partalidou, Maria & Fantozzi, Francesco & Arampatzis, Stratos & Papadopoulou, Olympia, 2014. "Agro-energy districts contributing to environmental and social sustainability in rural areas: Evaluation of a local public–private partnership scheme in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 85-95.
    5. Unger, C.J. & Lechner, A.M. & Kenway, J. & Glenn, V. & Walton, A., 2015. "A jurisdictional maturity model for risk management, accountability and continual improvement of abandoned mine remediation programs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Henriques, M.H. & Castro, A.R.S.F. & Félix, Y.R. & Carvalho, I.S., 2020. "Promoting sustainability in a low density territory through geoheritage: Casa da Pedra case-study (Araripe Geopark, NE Brazil)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Jiao, Wenting & Zhang, Xiaosen & Li, Changhong & Guo, Jiaqi, 2021. "Sustainable transition of mining cities in China: Literature review and policy analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Wang, Yongli & Yang, Jiale & Zhou, Minhan & Zhang, Danyang & Song, Fuhao & Dong, Fugui & Zhu, Jinrong & Liu, Lin, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of China's power generation industry based on a matter-element extension model," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Navarro, Rafael & Martínez-Martínez, Javier & Suárez, Jorge Fernández & Álvarez-Areces, Enrique & Baltuille, Jose Manuel, 2022. "Comparative analysis of the current uneven situation of historical quarries associated with the UNESCO world heritage sites in Spain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2019. "Consolidation as a risk management method in the lifecycle of a mining company: A novel methodological approach and evidence from the coal industry in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 169-177.
    11. Campbell, Bonnie, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility and development in Africa: Redefining the roles and responsibilities of public and private actors in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 138-143.
    12. Wang, Yongli & Li, Fang & Yang, Jiale & Zhou, Minhan & Song, Fuhao & Zhang, Danyang & Xue, Lu & Zhu, Jinrong, 2020. "Demand response evaluation of RIES based on improved matter-element extension model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Shan Yang & Zitong Xu & Kaijun Su, 2021. "Variable Weight Matter–Element Extension Model for the Stability Classification of Slope Rock Mass," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Conesa, Hector M. & Schulin, Rainer & Nowack, Bernd, 2008. "Mining landscape: A cultural tourist opportunity or an environmental problem: The study case of the Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 690-700, February.
    15. Suzuki, Soushi & Nijkamp, Peter, 2016. "An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in Data Envelopment Analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 100-112.
    16. Siqi Li & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Energy Sustainability Evaluation Model Based on the Matter-Element Extension Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    17. Wei, Jing & Zhang, Jianjun & Wu, Xia & Song, Zeyu, 2022. "Governance in mining enterprises: An effective way to promote the intensification of resources—Taking coal resources as an example," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Li & Dezhong Kong & Qinzhi Liu & Yu Xiong & Fei Chen & Haibing Zhang & Yunyun Chu, 2022. "Comprehensive Identification of Surface Subsidence Evaluation Grades of Mines in Southwest China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Castro, Nuria F. & Becerra, Javier E. & Bellopede, Rossana & Marini, Paola & Dino, Giovanna Antonella, 2022. "Introduction to ‘natural stones and cultural heritage promotion and preservation’," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Sallam, Emad S. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Ermolaev, Vladimir A., 2022. "Geoheritage resources and new direction of infrastructural growth in Egypt: From geosite assessment to policy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Hang Chen & Wei Wu & Li Cao & Xiaode Zhou & Rentai Guo & Liwei Nie & Wenxing Shang, 2022. "Source Analysis and Contamination Assessment of Potentially Toxic Element in Soil of Small Watershed in Mountainous Area of Southern Henan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Devenin, Veronica & Bianchi, Constanza, 2019. "Characterizing a mining space: Analysis from case studies in Chile and Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    7. Yuliang Yang & Chaoqun Cui, 2022. "Which Provincial Regions in China Should Give Priority to the Redevelopment of Abandoned Coal Mines? A Redevelopment Potential Evaluation Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Bethy Merchán-Sanmartín & Allen Cárdenas-Cruz & Maria Jaya-Montalvo & Josep Mata-Perelló & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2022. "Sites of Geological Interest Assessment for Geoeducation Strategies, ESPOL University Campus, Guayaquil, Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    10. Suranjan Sinha & Surajit Chakraborty & Shatrajit Goswami, 2017. "Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental sustainability of a surface coal mine," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 807-824, June.
    11. S. Vögele & K. Govorukha & P. Mayer & I. Rhoden & D. Rübbelke & W. Kuckshinrichs, 2023. "Effects of a coal phase-out in Europe on reaching the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 879-916, January.
    12. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Mo, Fei & Wang, Derek D., 2022. "Sustainable development of countries all over the world and the impact of renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 320-331.
    13. Kiguchi, Y. & Weeks, M. & Arakawa, R., 2021. "Predicting winners and losers under time-of-use tariffs using smart meter data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. Patrícia Rocha Maciel Fernandes & Hernani Mota de Lima, 2021. "A Framework for Ranking the Environmental Risk of Abandoned Mines in the State of Minas Gerais/Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Sarah Lauwo, 2018. "Challenging Masculinity in CSR Disclosures: Silencing of Women’s Voices in Tanzania’s Mining Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 689-706, May.
    16. Shaofeng Wang & Xin Cai & Jian Zhou & Zhengyang Song & Xiaofeng Li, 2022. "Analytical, Numerical and Big-Data-Based Methods in Deep Rock Mechanics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-5, September.
    17. Li, Yongbo & Barrueta Pinto, Mark Christhian & Kumar, D. Thresh, 2023. "Analyzing sustainability indicator for Chinese mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Loïc Lévi & Jean Jacques Nowak & Sylvain Petit & Hakim Hammadou, 2022. "Industrial legacy and hotel pricing: An application of spatial hedonic pricing analysis in Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(4), pages 870-898, June.
    19. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Marius-Ionuț Gordan & Elena Peț & Gabriela Popescu & Ioan Brad & Anda Ioana Milin & Tabita Cornelia Adamov & Ramona Ciolac & Anka Roxana Pascariu & Tiberiu Iancu, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Accommodation Prices of Romanian Rural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3599-:d:1220985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.