IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p608-d798641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inversion Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Songnen Plain Based on Multispectral Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Tang

    (School of Hydraulic and Electric Power, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Chong Du

    (School of Hydraulic and Electric Power, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Tangzhe Nie

    (School of Hydraulic and Electric Power, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)

Abstract

Sentinel-2A multi-spectral remote sensing image data underwent high-efficiency differential processing to extract spectral information, which was then matched to soil organic matter (SOM) laboratory test values from field samples. From this, multiple-linear stepwise regression (MLSR) and partial least square (PLSR) models were established based on a differential algorithm for surface SOM modeling. The original spectra were subjected to basic transformations with first- and second-derivative processing. MLSR and PLSR models were established based on these methods and the measured values, respectively. The results show that Sentinel-2A remote sensing imagery and SOM content correlated in some bands. The correlation between the spectral value and SOM content was significantly improved after mathematical transformation, especially square-root transformation. After differential processing, the multi-band model had better predictive ability (based on fitting accuracy) than single-band and unprocessed multi-band models. The MLSR and PLSR models of SOM had good prediction functionality. The reciprocal logarithm first-order differential MLSR regression model had the best prediction and inversion results (i.e., most consistent with the real-world data). The MLSR model is more stable and reliable for monitoring SOM content, and provides a feasible method and reference for SOM content-mapping of the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Tang & Chong Du & Tangzhe Nie, 2022. "Inversion Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Songnen Plain Based on Multispectral Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:608-:d:798641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liesenfeld, Roman & Richard, Jean-Francois, 2003. "Univariate and multivariate stochastic volatility models: estimation and diagnostics," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 505-531, September.
    2. Huihui Zhao & Peijia Liu & Baojin Qiao & Kening Wu, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution and Prediction of Soil Heavy Metals Based on Measured Samples and Multi-Spectral Images in Tai Lake of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Wang & Yong Zhou, 2022. "Combining Multitemporal Sentinel-2A Spectral Imaging and Random Forest to Improve the Accuracy of Soil Organic Matter Estimates in the Plough Layer for Cultivated Land," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Huijuan Zhang & Wenkai Liu & Qingfeng Hu & Xiaodong Huang, 2023. "Multi-Scale Integration and Distribution of Soil Organic Matter Spatial Variation in a Coal–Grain Compound Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauwens, L. & Galli, F., 2009. "Efficient importance sampling for ML estimation of SCD models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 1974-1992, April.
    2. BAUWENS, Luc & HAUTSCH, Nikolaus, 2003. "Dynamic latent factor models for intensity processes," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2003103, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Motta, Anderson C. O. & Hotta, Luiz K., 2003. "Exact Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Estimation of the Stochastic Volatility Model," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 23(2), November.
    4. Asai, Manabu & McAleer, Michael, 2015. "Forecasting co-volatilities via factor models with asymmetry and long memory in realized covariance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 251-262.
    5. Nolte, Ingmar & Voev, Valeri, 2007. "Panel intensity models with latent factors: An application to the trading dynamics on the foreign exchange market," CoFE Discussion Papers 07/02, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    6. Strickland, Chris M. & Martin, Gael M. & Forbes, Catherine S., 2008. "Parameterisation and efficient MCMC estimation of non-Gaussian state space models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 2911-2930, February.
    7. Ben Tims & Ronald Mahieu, 2006. "A Range-Based Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Model for Exchange Rates," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2-3), pages 409-424.
    8. Tore Selland Kleppe & Jun Yu & H.J. Skaug, 2010. "Simulated maximum likelihood estimation of continuous time stochastic volatility models," Advances in Econometrics, in: Maximum Simulated Likelihood Methods and Applications, pages 137-161, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    9. González-Rivera, Gloria & Yoldas, Emre, 2012. "Autocontour-based evaluation of multivariate predictive densities," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 328-342.
    10. Siem Jan Koopman & André Lucas & Marcel Scharth, 2016. "Predicting Time-Varying Parameters with Parameter-Driven and Observation-Driven Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 97-110, March.
    11. Yu Zhang & Meiling Liu & Li Kong & Tao Peng & Dong Xie & Li Zhang & Lingwen Tian & Xinyu Zou, 2022. "Temporal Characteristics of Stress Signals Using GRU Algorithm for Heavy Metal Detection in Rice Based on Sentinel-2 Images," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Tore Selland Kleppe & Jun Yu & Hans J. skaug, 2011. "Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Diffusion Models," Working Papers 10-2011, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    13. Malik, Sheheryar & Pitt, Michael K., 2011. "Particle filters for continuous likelihood evaluation and maximisation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 190-209.
    14. Ishihara, Tsunehiro & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2012. "Efficient Bayesian estimation of a multivariate stochastic volatility model with cross leverage and heavy-tailed errors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3674-3689.
    15. Lux, Thomas & Morales-Arias, Leonardo & Sattarhoff, Cristina, 2011. "A Markov-switching multifractal approach to forecasting realized volatility," Kiel Working Papers 1737, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Baştürk, N. & Borowska, A. & Grassi, S. & Hoogerheide, L. & van Dijk, H.K., 2019. "Forecast density combinations of dynamic models and data driven portfolio strategies," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 170-186.
    17. Jean-Francois Richard & Roman Liesenfeld, 2007. "Classical and Bayesian Analysis of Univariate and Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models," Working Paper 322, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Jan 2004.
    18. Maria Pacurar, 2008. "Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models In Finance: A Survey Of The Theoretical And Empirical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 711-751, September.
    19. Manabu Asai & Michael McAleer, 2011. "Alternative Asymmetric Stochastic Volatility Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 548-564, October.
    20. Blazsek, Szabolcs & Escribano, Alvaro, 2010. "Knowledge spillovers in US patents: A dynamic patent intensity model with secret common innovation factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 14-32, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:608-:d:798641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.