IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3976-d1077944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Protection or Development? Multiple Policy Effects Evaluation of the Resource Tax Collection Reform for Iron Ore Enterprises in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhui Yin

    (College of Economics and Trade, Shandong Management University, Jinan 250357, China)

  • Bowen Yang

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

The change from quantity-based taxation to price-based taxation of iron ore resources is an important measure for China to implement the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutralization, and to achieve green economic recovery. To explore the policy’s effectiveness in playing its tax function, and improving the environment and production efficiency, this paper takes the reform of the method of resource tax collection as the “quasi natural experiment” object, and selects the balanced panel data of 16 provinces in China from 2011 to 2021. The double difference method is used to evaluate the policy effect of the reform of resource tax collection. The research shows that: (1) Changing the resource tax from a “volume-based tax” to an “ad valorem tax” can effectively increase the government’s resource tax revenue, and promote the upgrading of enterprise production technology. (2) The reform of resource tax collection will eliminate some small and medium-sized enterprises that are backward in production technology and bring more pollution to the environment. (3) The reform of resource tax collection mode will increase the number of large and medium-sized iron ore enterprises and promote the standardization of the whole iron ore industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhui Yin & Bowen Yang, 2023. "Environmental Protection or Development? Multiple Policy Effects Evaluation of the Resource Tax Collection Reform for Iron Ore Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3976-:d:1077944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orlov, Anton, 2015. "An assessment of proposed energy resource tax reform in Russia: A static general equilibrium analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 251-263.
    2. Fraser, Rob & Kingwell, Ross, 1997. "Can expected tax revenue be increased by an investment-preserving switch from ad valorem royalties to a resource rent tax?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 103-108, September.
    3. Hung, N.M. & Quyen, N.V., 2009. "Specific or ad valorem tax for an exhaustible resource?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 132-134, February.
    4. Diderik Lund, 2011. "Neutrality of the Resource Super Profits Tax," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 44(3), pages 233-238, September.
    5. Ji, Yuhang & Lei, Yalin & Li, Li & Zhang, An & Wu, Sanmang & Li, Qun, 2021. "Evaluation of the implementation effects and the influencing factors of resource tax in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2014. "Energy Prices, Subsidies and Resource Tax Reform in China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 439-454, September.
    7. Hu, Haisheng & Dong, Wanhao & Zhou, Qian, 2021. "A comparative study on the environmental and economic effects of a resource tax and carbon tax in China: Analysis based on the computable general equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Nguyen Manh Hung & Nguyen Van Quyen, 2009. "Sales Tax: Specific or Ad Valorem Tax for a Non-renewable Resource?," Working Papers 03, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.
    9. Thuto Botlhole & John Asafu-Adjaye & Fabrizio Carmignani, 2012. "Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions And Tax Revenue Mobilisation In Sub-Sahara Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 80(2), pages 135-156, June.
    10. Yu Hao & Yunxia Guo & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: Does environmental regulation work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 403-424, January.
    11. Annicchiarico, Barbara & Di Dio, Fabio, 2015. "Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-21.
    12. Yue Liu & Pierre Failler & Zhiying Liu, 2022. "Impact of Environmental Regulations on Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of China’s Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Frestad, Dennis, 2010. "Corporate hedging under a resource rent tax regime," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 458-468, March.
    14. Yue Liu & Zhenghui Li & Manrui Xu, 2020. "The Influential Factors of Financial Cycle Spillover: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 1336-1350, May.
    15. Mawejje, Joseph, 2019. "Natural resources governance and tax revenue mobilization in sub saharan Africa: The role of EITI," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 176-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Xiaohua & Ren, Junlin & Wang, Yun, 2022. "The impact of resource taxation on resource curse: Evidence from Chinese resource tax policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Wang, Jie & Liao, Xianchun & Yu, Yue, 2022. "The examination of resource tax reform facilitating firms’ green innovation in resource-related industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Smith, James L., 2013. "Issues in extractive resource taxation: A review of research methods and models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 320-331.
    4. Bertrand Laporte & Celine de Quatrebarbes & Yannick Bouterige, 2022. "Tax design and rent sharing in mining sector: Evidence from African gold‐producing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1176-1196, August.
    5. Wenxuan Ma, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Educational Human Capital and Green Finance in Total-Factor Energy Efficiency in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Li, Yuan & Zhou, You & Yi, Bo-Wen & Wang, Ya, 2021. "Impacts of the coal resource tax on the electric power industry in China: A multi-regional comprehensive analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "How does tax system on energy industries affect energy demand, CO2 emissions, and economy in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Harouna Kinda, 2021. "Does transparency pay ? The impact of EITI on tax revenues in resource-rich developing countries," Working Papers hal-03208955, HAL.
    9. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2017. "Economic and environmental influences of coal resource tax in China: A dynamic computable general equilibrium approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 34-44.
    10. Wang, Yuyan & Wu, Qinghua & Razi, Ummara, 2023. "Drivers and mitigants of resources consumption in China: Discovering the role of digital finance and environmental regulations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Hoang, Thon T.C. & Nguyen, Dung T.K., 2023. "Women’s representation in parliament and tax mobilization," MPRA Paper 118367, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Aug 2023.
    12. Zhong, Meirui & Liu, Qing & Zeng, Anqi & Huang, Jianbai, 2018. "An effects analysis of China's metal mineral resource tax reform: A heterogeneous dynamic multi-regional CGE appraisal," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 303-313.
    13. Khezri, Mohsen & Heshmati, Almas & Ghazal, Reza & Khodaei, Mehdi, 2022. "Non-resource revenues and the resource curse in different institutional structures: The DIGNAR-MTFF model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Aïchatou Mourfou & Issaka Dialga & Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo, 2022. "Effets de l'exploitation des ressources naturelles sur la mobilisation des recettes fiscales non liées aux ressources naturelles dans l'Union Economique et Monétaire Ouest Africaine (UEMOA)," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(2), pages 188-200, June.
    15. Abdelwahed, Loujaina, 2020. "More oil, more or less taxes? New evidence on the impact of resource revenue on domestic tax revenue," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2014. "Programs, Prices and Policies Towards Energy Conservation and Environmental Quality in China," CCEP Working Papers 1407, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    17. Gao, Shuai & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2014. "Corporate Preferences for Domestic Policy Instruments under a Sectoral Market Mechanism: A Case Study of Shanxi Province in China," Working Papers 249496, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    18. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2017. "Are China's climate commitments in a post‐Paris agreement sufficiently ambitious?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), March.
    20. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2016. "The implementation of the Paris Agreement in the international and China?s context," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 63-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3976-:d:1077944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.