IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v79y2022ics0301420722004238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The examination of resource tax reform facilitating firms’ green innovation in resource-related industry in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jie
  • Liao, Xianchun
  • Yu, Yue

Abstract

The impact of resource tax reform on green innovation in resource related industry at micro-firm level is still unknown. By matching data from resource-associated firms in China's A-share market with green patent database from State Intellectual Property Office from 2000 to 2017, and applying Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and difference-in-difference (DID), the research results demonstrate that resource tax reform significantly facilitates firms' green innovation in resource industry and executive compensation intensifies the promoting effect. Further study reveals enterprise profitability works as an intermediary enhancing effect. Our findings on some degree coincide the literature like emissions trading scheme promoting green innovation, which emphasizes ex post or from emission consequences. In contrast, this paper focuses on levying resource tax that is limited to mineral resource-related firms and at the source of resource exploitation, and treats micro-firms as the main body of research unlike existing literature at macro level. More importantly, this paper combines GMM-DID models to solve endogeneity problem. Furthermore, this paper explores the mediating and moderating effects by corporate profitability and executive compensation, which have been neglected by the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jie & Liao, Xianchun & Yu, Yue, 2022. "The examination of resource tax reform facilitating firms’ green innovation in resource-related industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722004238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722004238
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    2. Li, Yuan & Zhou, You & Yi, Bo-Wen & Wang, Ya, 2021. "Impacts of the coal resource tax on the electric power industry in China: A multi-regional comprehensive analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Xu, Xiaoliang & Xu, Xuefen & Chen, Qian & Che, Ying, 2015. "The impact on regional “resource curse” by coal resource tax reform in China—A dynamic CGE appraisal," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 277-289.
    4. Xu, Xiaoliang & Xu, Xuefen & Chen, Qian & Che, Ying, 2018. "The impacts on CO2 emission reduction and haze by coal resource tax reform based on dynamic CGE model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 268-276.
    5. Zhong, Meirui & Liu, Qing & Zeng, Anqi & Huang, Jianbai, 2018. "An effects analysis of China's metal mineral resource tax reform: A heterogeneous dynamic multi-regional CGE appraisal," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 303-313.
    6. Popp, David, 2006. "International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 46-71, January.
    7. Hung, N.M. & Quyen, N.V., 2009. "Specific or ad valorem tax for an exhaustible resource?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 132-134, February.
    8. Jin, Wei & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2016. "On the mechanism of international technology diffusion for energy technological progress," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 39-61.
    9. Smirlock, Michael, 1985. "Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, February.
    10. Ji, Yuhang & Lei, Yalin & Li, Li & Zhang, An & Wu, Sanmang & Li, Qun, 2021. "Evaluation of the implementation effects and the influencing factors of resource tax in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Nguyen Manh Hung & Nguyen Van Quyen, 2009. "Sales Tax: Specific or Ad Valorem Tax for a Non-renewable Resource?," Working Papers 03, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.
    12. Wen, Shiyan & Jia, Zhijie, 2022. "The energy, environment and economy impact of coal resource tax, renewable investment, and total factor productivity growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Hao, Wen-Ting & Xu, Qing-Yang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2020. "Socio-economic and environmental impacts of the iron ore resource tax reform in China: A CGE-based analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Martin L. Weitzman, 1974. "Prices vs. Quantities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(4), pages 477-491.
    15. Chen, Zhongfei & Zhang, Xiao & Chen, Fanglin, 2021. "Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Song, Yi & Zhang, Yangxueying & Zhang, Yijun, 2022. "Economic and environmental influences of resource tax: Firm-level evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Hayashi, Fumio, 1982. "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 213-224, January.
    18. Ma, Qiang & Mentel, Grzegorz & Zhao, Xin & Salahodjaev, Raufhon & Kuldasheva, Zebo, 2022. "Natural resources tax volatility and economic performance: Evaluating the role of digital economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Ge, Jianping & Lei, Yalin, 2018. "Resource tax on rare earths in China: Policy evolution and market responses," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 291-297.
    20. Qiu, Larry D. & Zhou, Mohan & Wei, Xu, 2018. "Regulation, innovation, and firm selection: The porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 638-658.
    21. Deng, Yaling & You, Daming & Wang, Jingjing, 2022. "Research on the nonlinear mechanism underlying the effect of tax competition on green technology innovation - An analysis based on the dynamic spatial Durbin model and the threshold panel model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen Hu & Yanan Li & Penghao Ye, 2023. "The Halo Effect of Government: Does State-Owned Capital Promote the Green Innovation of Chinese Private Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Chen, Wanyi & Jin, Rong, 2023. "Does tax uncertainty affect firm innovation speed?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Xiaohua & Ren, Junlin & Wang, Yun, 2022. "The impact of resource taxation on resource curse: Evidence from Chinese resource tax policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Boqiang Lin & Zhijie Jia, 2020. "Supply control vs. demand control: why is resource tax more effective than carbon tax in reducing emissions?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Wen, Shiyan & Jia, Zhijie, 2022. "The energy, environment and economy impact of coal resource tax, renewable investment, and total factor productivity growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Xu, Xiaoliang & Xu, Xuefen, 2021. "Can resource policy adjustments effectively curb regional “resource curse” ? new evidences from the “energy golden triangle area” of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Hao, Wen-Ting & Xu, Qing-Yang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2020. "Socio-economic and environmental impacts of the iron ore resource tax reform in China: A CGE-based analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2017. "Economic and environmental influences of coal resource tax in China: A dynamic computable general equilibrium approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 34-44.
    7. Jin, Chenfei & Tsai, Fu-Sheng & Gu, Qiuyang & Wu, Bao, 2022. "Does the porter hypothesis work well in the emission trading schema pilot? Exploring moderating effects of institutional settings," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Zhong, Meirui & Liu, Qing & Zeng, Anqi & Huang, Jianbai, 2018. "An effects analysis of China's metal mineral resource tax reform: A heterogeneous dynamic multi-regional CGE appraisal," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 303-313.
    9. Li, Yuan & Zhou, You & Yi, Bo-Wen & Wang, Ya, 2021. "Impacts of the coal resource tax on the electric power industry in China: A multi-regional comprehensive analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Yanhui Yin & Bowen Yang, 2023. "Environmental Protection or Development? Multiple Policy Effects Evaluation of the Resource Tax Collection Reform for Iron Ore Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2018. "Capital Accumulation, Green Paradox, and Stranded Assets: An Endogenous Growth Perspective," Working Papers 2018.33, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Hu, Haisheng & Dong, Wanhao & Zhou, Qian, 2021. "A comparative study on the environmental and economic effects of a resource tax and carbon tax in China: Analysis based on the computable general equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Lawrence H. Goulder, 2013. "Markets for Pollution Allowances: What Are the (New) Lessons?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 87-102, Winter.
    14. Philippe Aghion & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & David Hémous & Ralf Martin & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 1-51.
    15. Chan, Ying Tung & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Optimal carbon tax rates in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with a supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    18. Rik L. Rozendaal & Herman R. J. Vollebergh, 2021. "Policy-Induced Innovation in Clean Technologies: Evidence from the Car Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 9422, CESifo.
    19. Jing Song & Mengyuan Li & Shaosong Wang & Tao Ye, 2022. "To What Extent Does Environmental Regulation Influence Emission Reduction? Evidence from Local and Neighboring Locations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-9, August.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p4oq2cqb0 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2019. "Directed Technical Change, Environmental Sustainability, and Population Growth," Discussion Papers 19-12, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722004238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.