IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16857-d1004325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Study on the Use of Non-Contact Prevention and Protection Products in the Context of COVID-19: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method from AHP and Entropy Weight Method

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlong Guo

    (Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Department of Design, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
    Anhui Institute of Contemporary Studies, Anhui Academy of Social Sciences, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Xuan Li

    (Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Department of Design, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Denghang Chen

    (Department of Science and Technology Communication, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Han Zhang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266000, China)

Abstract

In the post-epidemic era, there is an endless supply of epidemic prevention products that cover a wide range of public areas. The introduction of such products has eased the tense pattern of virus proliferation in the context of the epidemic, and effectively demonstrated the initiatives implemented by the Chinese people in response to the outbreak. This paper therefore begins with the study of contactless epidemic prevention products, which appear in a form that meets the needs of contemporary society and offers a new mode of living to it. It enriches the measures for epidemic prevention and control. By obtaining satisfaction ratings from the user community, the performance of such products can be understood in time to provide a substantial basis for the subsequent upgrading and optimization or transformation of such products. This study uses the KJ method and questionnaires to construct an index system for contactless epidemic prevention products, grasp users’ needs for epidemic prevention products in real time, classify and identify such products, and select such products as epidemic prevention smart security gates, medical delivery robots, infrared handheld thermometers, thermographic body temperature screening, contactless inductive lift buttons, and contactless medical vending machines. The questionnaire was designed with four dimensions: safety, intelligence, aesthetics and economy. A sample size of 262 was collected through the distribution of questionnaires. We used AHP and entropy weighting methods for the comprehensive evaluation; AHP basically tells us how satisfied most users are with this type of product. The use of the entropy weighting method can achieve objectivity in the weighting process. Combining the two approaches helps to improve the scientific nature of the weighting of the evaluation indexes for contactless and epidemic-proof products. It is clear from the AHP analysis that, firstly, there are differences in the perceptions of the performance of this type of product between different age groups. Secondly, the user group rated the perceived performance of the product presented as high ( B n > 0.200 ), which users can subjectively and directly perceive. Next, the perceived future sustainable economic development of this product category is low ( B n ≤ 0.200 ), and users place low importance on its economic aspects as an objective additional condition. The entropy method of analysis shows that, under reasonable government control of the market for intelligent products, the safety, intelligence and aesthetic effects of these products are significant ( C m ≤ 0.100 ); further, the economic presentation of these products has yet to be optimized and upgraded ( C m > 0.100 ).

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlong Guo & Xuan Li & Denghang Chen & Han Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation Study on the Use of Non-Contact Prevention and Protection Products in the Context of COVID-19: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method from AHP and Entropy Weight Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16857-:d:1004325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Mina, Hassan & Alavi, Behrouz, 2020. "A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon T. & Asche, Frank & Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim, 2020. "Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Supavich Fone Pengnate & Rathindra Sarathy & Todd J. Arnold, 2021. "The Influence of the Centrality of Visual Website Aesthetics on Online User Responses: Measure Development and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 435-452, April.
    4. Ashutosh Sharma & Elizaveta Podoplelova & Gleb Shapovalov & Alexey Tselykh & Alexander Tselykh, 2021. "Sustainable Smart Cities: Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Zishun Su & Qiaoling Zou & Xinying Wu & Junnan Ye & Jianxin Cheng & Victor Shi, 2021. "Participant and Strategy Selection of Health QR Code Product Experience Design during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: The Information Security Perspective," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, October.
    6. Suzanne Reimer & Philip Pinch, 2021. "Sites of qualification: the motorcycle rider airbag and the production of safety," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 26-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Rahies Khan & Amir Manzoor, 2021. "Application and Impact of New Technologies in the Supply Chain Management During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 277-292.
    2. Fattahi, Mohammad & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Kannan, Devika & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Resource planning strategies for healthcare systems during a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 192-206.
    3. Isabel Marques & Zélia Serrasqueiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Managers’ Competences in Private Hospitals for Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    5. Wu, Jiansong & Zhang, Linlin & Bai, Yiping & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "A safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises based on System Dynamics and Bayesian network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Tang, Lianhua & Li, Yantong & Bai, Danyu & Liu, Tao & Coelho, Leandro C., 2022. "Bi-objective optimization for a multi-period COVID-19 vaccination planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Rozhkov, Maxim & Ivanov, Dmitry & Blackhurst, Jennifer & Nair, Anand, 2022. "Adapting supply chain operations in anticipation of and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Gilani Larimi, Niloofar & Azhdari, Abolghasem & Ghousi, Rouzbeh & Du, Bo, 2022. "Integrating GIS in reorganizing blood supply network in a robust-stochastic approach by combating disruption damages," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    10. Samani, Mohammad Reza Ghatreh & Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Homaei, Shamim, 2020. "A reactive phase against disruptions for designing a proactive platelet supply network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "New Circular Networks in Resilient Supply Chains: An External Capital Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Bianco, Débora & Bueno, Adauto & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Latan, Hengky & Miller Devós Ganga, Gilberto & Frank, Alejandro G. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, 2023. "The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Shafiee, Mohammad & Zare-Mehrjerdi, Yahia & Govindan, Kannan & Dastgoshade, Sohaib, 2022. "A causality analysis of risks to perishable product supply chain networks during the COVID-19 outbreak era: An extended DEMATEL method under Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Christos A. Kontovas & Krishna Sooprayen, 2020. "Maritime Cargo Prioritisation during a Prolonged Pandemic Lockdown Using an Integrated TOPSIS-Knapsack Technique: A Case Study on Small Island Developing States—The Rodrigues Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Hong, Seock-Jin & Savoie, Michael & Joiner, Steve & Kincaid, Timothy, 2022. "Analysis of airline employees’ perceptions of corporate preparedness for COVID-19 disruptions to airline operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-55.
    16. Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Oskari Lähdeaho & Ville Henttu & Per Hilletofth, 2020. "Covid-19 Pandemic: Early Implications for North European Manufacturing and Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Md. Rayhan Sarker & Md. Abdul Moktadir & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez-Gonzalez, 2021. "Social Sustainability Challenges Towards Flexible Supply Chain Management: Post-COVID-19 Perspective," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 199-218, December.
    18. Gilani, Hani & Sahebi, Hadi, 2022. "A data-driven robust optimization model by cutting hyperplanes on vaccine access uncertainty in COVID-19 vaccine supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Burgos, Diana & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2021. "Food retail supply chain resilience and the COVID-19 pandemic: A digital twin-based impact analysis and improvement directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16857-:d:1004325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.