IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v221y2022ics0951832022000126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises based on System Dynamics and Bayesian network theory

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jiansong
  • Zhang, Linlin
  • Bai, Yiping
  • Reniers, Genserik

Abstract

In recent years, frequent large-scale power grid accidents have caused serious economic losses and bad social impact, which has drawn great attention from power grid enterprises. As one of the key elements of production, safety investment plays an important role in improving the safety level and reducing accident loss. In this paper, System dynamics (SD) and Bayesian network (BN) are integrated to develop a novel safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises, which takes into account the impact of safety investment factors on accidents and the interactions between them. Based on sensitivity analysis, critical safety investment factors are determined to form the subsystem of the SD model. Subsequently, the optimal safety investment strategy is determined by a three-step simulation. The simulation results show that there are barrel effects and a diminishing marginal utility in safety investment. The proposed safety investment optimization model is practical to provide technical supports and guidance for determining an effective safety investment strategy in power grid enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jiansong & Zhang, Linlin & Bai, Yiping & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "A safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises based on System Dynamics and Bayesian network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:221:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022000126
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022000126
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmaieli, M. & Ahmadian, M., 2018. "The effect of research and development incentive on wind power investment, a system dynamics approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 765-773.
    2. Sato, Yuji, 2012. "Optimal budget planning for investment in safety measures of a chemical company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 579-585.
    3. Matellini, D.B. & Wall, A.D. & Jenkinson, I.D. & Wang, J. & Pritchard, R., 2013. "Modelling dwelling fire development and occupancy escape using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-91.
    4. KIM, Junyung & ZHAO, Xingang & SHAH, Asad Ullah Amin & KANG, Hyun Gook, 2021. "System risk quantification and decision making support using functional modeling and dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Liu, Jianqiao & Zou, Yanhua & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Li & Liu, Xueyang & Ding, Qianqiao & Qin, Zhuomin & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2021. "Analysis of dependencies among performance shaping factors in human reliability analysis based on a system dynamics approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon T. & Asche, Frank & Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim, 2020. "Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Senkel, Anne & Bode, Carsten & Schmitz, Gerhard, 2021. "Quantification of the resilience of integrated energy systems using dynamic simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. He, Y.X. & Jiao, J. & Chen, R.J. & Shu, H., 2018. "The optimization of Chinese power grid investment based on transmission and distribution tariff policy: A system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 112-122.
    9. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus & Munir, Abu Bakar & Rahim, Ruzairi Abdul, 2015. "Role of feed-in tariff policy in promoting solar photovoltaic investments in Malaysia: A system dynamics approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 808-815.
    10. Yu, Xianyu & Wu, Zemin & Wang, Qunwei & Sang, Xiuzhi & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Exploring the investment strategy of power enterprises under the nationwide carbon emissions trading mechanism: A scenario-based system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Rios-Festner, Daniel & Blanco, Gerardo & Olsina, Fernando, 2020. "Long-term assessment of power capacity incentives by modeling generation investment dynamics under irreversibility and uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Misuri, Alessio & Khakzad, Nima & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2019. "A Bayesian network methodology for optimal security management of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Quintanar-Gago, David A. & Nelson, Pamela F. & Díaz-Sánchez, à ngeles & Boldrick, Michael S., 2021. "Assessment of steam turbine blade failure and damage mechanisms using a Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Argenti, Francesca & Landucci, Gabriele & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2018. "Vulnerability assessment of chemical facilities to intentional attacks based on Bayesian Network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 515-530.
    15. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Xiaoxue & Ding, Long & Ji, Jie & Cozzani, Valerio, 2022. "A cost-effective optimization model of safety investment allocation for risk reduction of domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Wang, Shaochen & Tian, Wende & Li, Chuankun & Cui, Zhe & Liu, Bin, 2023. "Mechanism-based deep learning for tray efficiency soft-sensing in distillation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Khakzad, Nima, 2023. "A goal programming approach to multi-objective optimization of firefighting strategies in the event of domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Anzhela Sergeevna Voskovskaya & Tatiana Anatolievna Karpova & Tatiana Anatolievna Tantsura & Anna Yurievna Shirokih & Olga Yevgenievna Lebedeva & Kostyantyn Anatol’evich Lebedev, 2022. "The Risk Management System as an Enhancement Factor for Investment Attractiveness of Russian Enterprises," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yongli & Zhang, Fuli & Zhang, Yuanyuan & Wang, Xiaohai & Fan, Lisha & Song, Fuhao & Ma, Yuze & Wang, Shuo, 2019. "Chinese power-grid financial capacity based on transmission and distribution tariff policy: A system dynamics approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Izzet Alp Gul & Gülgün Kayakutlu & M. Özgür Kayalica, 2020. "Risk Analysis in Renewable Energy System (RES) Investment for a Developing Country: A Case Study in Pakistan," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(2), pages 204-223, December.
    3. Esmaieli, M. & Ahmadian, M., 2018. "The effect of research and development incentive on wind power investment, a system dynamics approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 765-773.
    4. Darya Pyatkina & Tamara Shcherbina & Vadim Samusenkov & Irina Razinkina & Mariusz Sroka, 2021. "Modeling and Management of Power Supply Enterprises’ Cash Flows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Liu, Dunnan & Xiao, Bowen, 2018. "Exploring the development of electric vehicles under policy incentives: A scenario-based system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 8-23.
    6. Ye, Rui-Ke & Gao, Zhuang-Fei & Fang, Kai & Liu, Kang-Li & Chen, Jia-Wei, 2021. "Moving from subsidy stimulation to endogenous development: A system dynamics analysis of China's NEVs in the post-subsidy era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Wang, Yongli & Zhou, Minhan & Zhang, Fuli & Zhang, Yuli & Ma, Yuze & Dong, Huanran & Zhang, Danyang & Liu, Lin, 2021. "Chinese grid investment based on transmission and distribution tariff policy: An optimal coordination between capacity and demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Hu, Yu & Chi, Yuanying & Zhao, Hao & Zhou, Wenbing, 2022. "The development of renewable energy industry under renewable portfolio standards: From the perspective of provincial resource differences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Yilmaz, S. & Rinaldi, A. & Patel, M.K., 2020. "DSM interactions: What is the impact of appliance energy efficiency measures on the demand response (peak load management)?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Dmitry Borisoglebsky & Liz Varga, 2019. "A Resilience Toolbox and Research Design for Black Sky Hazards to Power Grids," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, June.
    11. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Xu, Xiaomin & Niu, Dongxiao & Xiao, Bowen & Guo, Xiaodan & Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Keke, 2020. "Policy analysis for grid parity of wind power generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Deng, Yu-Jing & Li, Ya-Qian & Qin, Yu-Hua & Dong, Ming-Ru & Liu, Bin, 2020. "Optimal defense resource allocation for attacks in wireless sensor networks based on risk assessment model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Wu, Zhongqun & Zheng, Ruijin, 2022. "Research on the impact of financial transmission rights on transmission expansion: A system dynamics model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    15. Huang, Wencheng & Li, Linqing & Liu, Hongyi & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao, 2021. "Defense resource allocation in road dangerous goods transportation network: A Self-Contained Girvan-Newman Algorithm and Mean Variance Model combined approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Lei Gao & Zhen-Yu Zhao & Cui Li, 2022. "An Investment Decision-Making Approach for Power Grid Projects: A Multi-Objective Optimization Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2021. "A pathway to green growth? Macroeconomic impacts of power grid infrastructure investments in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Dong, Mingxin & Zhang, Zhen & Liu, Yi & Zhao, Dong Feng & Meng, Yifei & Shi, Jihao, 2023. "Playing Bayesian Stackelberg game model for optimizing the vulnerability level of security incident system in petrochemical plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Birong Huang & Zilong Wang & Yuan Gu, 2023. "ESG Investment Scale Allocation of China’s Power Grid Company Using System Dynamics Simulation Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Jingqi Sun & Nuermaimaiti Ruze & Jianjun Zhang & Haoran Zhao & Boyang Shen, 2019. "Evaluating the Investment Efficiency of China’s Provincial Power Grid Enterprises under New Electricity Market Reform: Empirical Evidence Based on Three-Stage DEA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:221:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022000126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.