IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7679-d845837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Hazardous-Waste Testing Follow Technical Guidance, Thus Help Protect Environmental Justice and Health?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Shrader-Frechette

    (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA)

Abstract

Does representative hazardous-waste-site testing tend to follow or to violate government technical guidance? This is an important question, because following such guidance promotes reliable risk analysis, adequate remediation, and environmental-justice and -health protection. Yet only government documents typically address this question, usually only when it is too late, when citizens have already exhibited health harm, allegedly from living or working near current/former hazardous-waste sites. Because no systematic, representative, scientific analyses have answered the preceding question, this article begins to investigate it by posing a narrower part of the question: Does representative US testing of volatile-organic-compound (VOC) waste sites tend to follow or to violate government technical requirements? The article (i) outlines US/state-government technical guidance for VOC testing; (ii) develops criteria for discovering representative US cases of VOC testing; (iii) uses the dominant US Environmental Protection Agency method to assess whether these representative cases follow such guidance; (iv) employs the results of (iii) to begin to answer the preceding question; then (v) discusses the degree to which, if any, these results suggest threats to environmental health or justice. Our initial, but representative, results show that almost all US VOC-waste-site testing (that we investigated) violates government technical requirements and systematically underestimates risks, and this may help justify less expensive, potentially health-threatening cleanups, mostly in environmental justice communities. We outline needed future research and suggest two strategies to promote following government technical guidance for hazardous-waste testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Shrader-Frechette, 2022. "Does Hazardous-Waste Testing Follow Technical Guidance, Thus Help Protect Environmental Justice and Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7679-:d:845837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilary Sigman & Sarah Stafford, 2011. "Management of Hazardous Waste and Contaminated Land," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 255-275, October.
    2. Linda McCarthy, 2009. "Off the Mark?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(3), pages 211-228, August.
    3. Olesya M. Savchenko & John B. Braden, 2019. "Do Public Benefits of Voluntary Cleanup Programs Justify Their Public Costs? Evidence from New York," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 95(3), pages 369-390.
    4. Kevin Haninger & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2017. "The Value of Brownfield Remediation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 197-241.
    5. Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Andrew M. Biondo, 2021. "Health Misinformation about Toxic-Site Harm: The Case for Independent-Party Testing to Confirm Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-33, April.
    6. Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Andrew M. Biondo, 2021. "Data-Quality Assessment Signals Toxic-Site Safety Threats and Environmental Injustices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Andrew M. Biondo, 2020. "Protecting Children from Toxic Waste: Data-Usability Evaluation Can Deter Flawed Cleanup," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Andrew M. Biondo, 2021. "Health Misinformation about Toxic-Site Harm: The Case for Independent-Party Testing to Confirm Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-33, April.
    2. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    3. Lappi, Pauli, 2018. "Optimal clean-up of polluted sites," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    4. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    5. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin R. & Belke, James & Mason, Henry, 2023. "The property value impacts of industrial chemical accidents," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Polyakov, Maksym & Iftekhar, Md Sayed & Fogarty, James & Buurman, Joost, 2022. "Renewal of waterways in a dense city creates value for residents," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Song, Yang & Lyu, Yang & Qian, Sitong & Zhang, Xinjia & Lin, Huiying & Wang, Shijun, 2022. "Identifying urban candidate brownfield sites using multi-source data: The case of Changchun City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Kitchens, Carl & Wallace, Cullen T., 2022. "The impact of place-based poverty relief: Evidence from the Federal Promise Zone Program," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Mei, Yingdan & Qiu, Jixiang & Wu, Jialu & Meng, Lina, 2021. "Do residents care about urban dumps? Evidence from individual housing transaction data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Steve Gibbons & Stephan Heblich & Esther Lho & Christopher Timmins, 2016. "Fear of Fracking? The Impact of the Shale Gas Exploration on House Prices in Britain," SERC Discussion Papers 0207, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. Laura A. Bakkensen & Xiaozhou Ding & Lala Ma, 2019. "Flood Risk and Salience: New Evidence from the Sunshine State," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1132-1158, April.
    12. Margaux Lapierre & Alexandre Sauquet & Julie Subervie, 2019. "Providing technical assistance to peer networks to reduce pesticide use in Europe: Evidence from the French Ecophyto plan," Working Papers hal-02190979, HAL.
    13. Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Andrew M. Biondo, 2021. "Data-Quality Assessment Signals Toxic-Site Safety Threats and Environmental Injustices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Robert Germeshausen & Kathrine von Graevenitz, 2023. "State Mandates on Renewable Heating Technologies and the Housing Market," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(4), pages 543-557.
    15. Sanda Marioara Naș & Mircea Vasile Bondrea & Virgil Mihai Rădulescu & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Samuel Vereș & Raluca Bondrea & Adrian Traian Rădulescu, 2023. "The Use of UAVs for Land Use Planning of Brownfield Regeneration Projects-Case Study: Former Brick Factory, Cluj Napoca, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Guertin, France & Polzin, Thomas & Rogers, Martha & Witt, Betsy, 2018. "Incorporating Co-Benefits and Environmental Data into Corporate Decision-Making," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274842, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2018. "An ordinal classification of brownfield remediation projects in China for the allocation of government funding," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 220-230.
    18. Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Liu, Xiangping, 2016. "Disentangling property value impacts of environmental contamination from locally undesirable land uses: Implications for measuring post-cleanup stigmaAuthor-Name: Taylor, Laura O," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-98.
    19. Michael Trouw & Stephan Weiler & Jesse Silverstein, 2020. "Brownfield Development: Uncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Risk Premia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Catherine Hausman & Ryan Kellogg, 2015. "Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 46(1 (Spring), pages 71-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7679-:d:845837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.