IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i1p26-d1023637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Screening Prediction in the Portuguese National Health Service: Data Analysis, Machine Learning Models, Explainability and Meta-Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Gonçalves

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    Centro Algoritmi, Vista Lab, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Rute Veladas

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Hua Yang

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    Department of Computer Science, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450007, China)

  • Renata Vieira

    (CIDEHUS, University of Évora, 7000-809 Évora, Portugal)

  • Paulo Quaresma

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    Centro Algoritmi, Vista Lab, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Paulo Infante

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    CIMA—Centro de Investigação em Matemática e Aplicações, University of Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

  • Cátia Sousa Pinto

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • João Oliveira

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria Cortes Ferreira

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Jéssica Morais

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Raquel Pereira

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Nuno Fernandes

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carolina Gonçalves

    (Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde, 1050-099 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the calls made to the Portuguese National Health Contact Center (SNS24) during a three years period. The final goal was to develop a system to help nurse attendants select the appropriate clinical pathway (from 59 options) for each call. It examines several aspects of the calls distribution like age and gender of the user, date and time of the call and final referral, among others and presents comparative results for alternative classification models (SVM and CNN) and different data samples (three months, one and two years data models). For the task of selecting the appropriate pathway, the models, learned on the basis of the available data, achieved F1 values that range between 0.642 (3 months CNN model) and 0.783 (2 years CNN model), with SVM having a more stable performance (between 0.743 and 0.768 for the corresponding data samples). These results are discussed regarding error analysis and possibilities for explaining the system decisions. A final meta evaluation, based on a clinical expert overview, compares the different choices: the nurse attendants (reference ground truth), the expert and the automatic decisions (2 models), revealing a higher agreement between the ML models, followed by their agreement with the clinical expert, and minor agreement with the reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Gonçalves & Rute Veladas & Hua Yang & Renata Vieira & Paulo Quaresma & Paulo Infante & Cátia Sousa Pinto & João Oliveira & Maria Cortes Ferreira & Jéssica Morais & Ana Raquel Pereira & Nuno Fer, 2023. "Clinical Screening Prediction in the Portuguese National Health Service: Data Analysis, Machine Learning Models, Explainability and Meta-Evaluation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:26-:d:1023637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua Yang & Teresa Gonçalves & Paulo Quaresma & Renata Vieira & Rute Veladas & Cátia Sousa Pinto & João Oliveira & Maria Cortes Ferreira & Jéssica Morais & Ana Raquel Pereira & Nuno Fernandes & Carolin, 2022. "Clinical Trial Classification of SNS24 Calls with Neural Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    2. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    4. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "On-line monitoring of power curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1487-1493.
    6. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    7. Dursun Delen & Hamed M. Zolbanin & Durand Crosby & David Wright, 2021. "To imprison or not to imprison: an analytics model for drug courts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 101-124, August.
    8. Doruk Cengiz & Arindrajit Dube & Attila S. Lindner & David Zentler-Munro, 2021. "Seeing Beyond the Trees: Using Machine Learning to Estimate the Impact of Minimum Wages on Labor Market Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 28399, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Zhou, Jing & Li, Wei & Wang, Jiaxin & Ding, Shuai & Xia, Chengyi, 2019. "Default prediction in P2P lending from high-dimensional data based on machine learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    10. Lu, Yingjie & Li, Tao & Hu, Hui & Zeng, Xuemei, 2023. "Short-term prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration based on machine learning with different decomposition methods in arid areas of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Bohdan M. Pavlyshenko, 2019. "Machine-Learning Models for Sales Time Series Forecasting," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Jason R. W. Merrick & Claire A. Dorsey & Bo Wang & Martha Grabowski & John R. Harrald, 2022. "Measuring Prediction Accuracy in a Maritime Accident Warning System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 819-827, February.
    14. Buzna, Luboš & De Falco, Pasquale & Ferruzzi, Gabriella & Khormali, Shahab & Proto, Daniela & Refa, Nazir & Straka, Milan & van der Poel, Gijs, 2021. "An ensemble methodology for hierarchical probabilistic electric vehicle load forecasting at regular charging stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    15. Adler, Werner & Lausen, Berthold, 2009. "Bootstrap estimated true and false positive rates and ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 718-729, January.
    16. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2017. "Predicting recessions with boosted regression trees," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 745-759.
    17. Andrea Sciandra & Alessio Surian & Livio Finos, 2021. "Supervised Machine Learning Methods to Disclose Action and Information in “U.N. 2030 Agenda” Social Media Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 689-699, August.
    18. Mirosław Parol & Paweł Piotrowski & Piotr Kapler & Mariusz Piotrowski, 2021. "Forecasting of 10-Second Power Demand of Highly Variable Loads for Microgrid Operation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Chen, Yu-Kai & Chiu, Shih-Hao & Lu, Jye-Chyi & Vu, Thuy-Linh, 2022. "An innovative demand forecasting approach for the server industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Jiaming Zeng & Michael F. Gensheimer & Daniel L. Rubin & Susan Athey & Ross D. Shachter, 2022. "Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:26-:d:1023637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.