IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v10y2018i7p61-d155497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalised and Coordinated Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Service Design: A Genetic Algorithms Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Sun

    (School of Transportation, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
    College of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Ming Wei

    (School of Transportation, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
    Nantong Research Institute for Advanced Communication Technologies, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Chunfeng Yang

    (College of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Zhihuo Xu

    (School of Transportation, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Han Wang

    (School of Transportation, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to create an efficient optimization framework for demand-responsive feeder transit services to assign vehicles to cover all pickup locations to transport passengers to a rail station. The proposed methodology features passengers placing a personalized travel order involving the subway schedule chosen by passengers and windows of service time, etc. Moreover, synchronous transfer between the shuttle and feeder bus is fully accounted for in the problem. A mixed-integer linear programming model is formulated to minimize the total travel time for all passengers, which consists of ride-time for vehicles from the pickup locations to the rail station and wait-time for passengers taking the subway beforehand. Different from conventional methods, the proposed model benefits from using a real distribution of passenger demand aggregated from cellular data and travel time or the distance matrix obtained from an open GIS tool. A distributed genetic algorithm is further designed to obtain meta-optimal solutions in a reasonable amount of time. When applied to design a feeder bus system in Nanjing City, China, case study results reveal that the total travel time of the proposed model was reduced by 2.46% compared to the traditional model. Sensitivity analyses were also further performed to investigate the impact of the number of vehicles on the output. Finally, the difference in results of Cplex, standard GA, and the proposed algorithm were compared to prove the validity of the algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Chunfeng Yang & Zhihuo Xu & Han Wang, 2018. "Personalised and Coordinated Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Service Design: A Genetic Algorithms Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:61-:d:155497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/7/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/7/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Lee & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "An extended demand responsive connector," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 25-50, March.
    2. V. F. Hurdle, 1973. "Minimum Cost Locations for Parallel Public Transit Lines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 340-350, November.
    3. Azi, Nabila & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2007. "An exact algorithm for a single-vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple routes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 755-766, May.
    4. Lucio Martins, Carlos & Vaz Pato, Margarida, 1998. "Search strategies for the feeder bus network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 425-440, April.
    5. Shoaib M. Chowdhury & Steven I-Jy Chien, 2002. "Intermodal Transit System Coordination," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 257-287, January.
    6. Gilbert Laporte, 2009. "Fifty Years of Vehicle Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 408-416, November.
    7. M. W. P. Savelsbergh & M. Sol, 1995. "The General Pickup and Delivery Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 17-29, February.
    8. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2007. "The dial-a-ride problem: models and algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 29-46, September.
    9. Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Senlai Zhu, 2018. "Optimal Design of Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Services with Passengers’ Multiple Time Windows and Satisfaction," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Shrivastava, Prabhat & O'Mahony, Margaret, 2006. "A model for development of optimized feeder routes and coordinated schedules--A genetic algorithms approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 413-425, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia Nasri & Hend Bouziri & Wassila Aggoune-Mtalaa, 2022. "An Evolutionary Descent Algorithm for Customer-Oriented Mobility-On-Demand Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Yi Cao & Dandan Jiang & Shan Wang, 2022. "Optimization for Feeder Bus Route Model Design with Station Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Senlai Zhu, 2018. "Optimal Design of Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Services with Passengers’ Multiple Time Windows and Satisfaction," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Badia, Hugo & Jenelius, Erik, 2021. "Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 146-172.
    3. GALARZA MONTENEGRO, Bryan David & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VANSTEENWEGEN, Pieter, 2023. "A demand-responsive feeder service with a maximum headway at mandatory stops," Working Papers 2023001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Liang, Jinpeng & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Yang, Xin & Lo, Hong K., 2019. "Bus transit network design with uncertainties on the basis of a metro network: A two-step model framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 115-138.
    5. Yu, Yao & Machemehl, Randy B. & Xie, Chi, 2015. "Demand-responsive transit circulator service network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 160-175.
    6. Regnier-Coudert, Olivier & McCall, John & Ayodele, Mayowa & Anderson, Steven, 2016. "Truck and trailer scheduling in a real world, dynamic and heterogeneous context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 389-408.
    7. Sivakumaran, Karthikgeyan & Li, Yuwei & Cassidy, Michael J. & Madanat, Samer, 2010. "Cost-Saving Properties of Schedule Coordination in a Simple Trunk-and-Feeder Transit System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9qr8s3hx, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & van Arem, Bart, 2016. "Solving the User Optimum Privately Owned Automated Vehicles Assignment Problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 64-88.
    9. Mohammad Hadi Almasi & Ali Sadollah & Seungmo Kang & Mohamed Rehan Karim, 2016. "Optimization of an Improved Intermodal Transit Model Equipped with Feeder Bus and Railway Systems Using Metaheuristics Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.
    11. Alan Lee & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "An extended demand responsive connector," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 25-50, March.
    12. Z. Al Chami & H. Manier & M.-A. Manier, 2019. "A lexicographic approach for the bi-objective selective pickup and delivery problem with time windows and paired demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 237-255, February.
    13. Liang, Jinpeng & Wu, Jianjun & Qu, Yunchao & Yin, Haodong & Qu, Xiaobo & Gao, Ziyou, 2019. "Robust bus bridging service design under rail transit system disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 97-116.
    14. Capelle, Thomas & Cortés, Cristián E. & Gendreau, Michel & Rey, Pablo A. & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2019. "A column generation approach for location-routing problems with pickup and delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 121-131.
    15. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    16. Bhoopalam, Anirudh Kishore & Agatz, Niels & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2018. "Planning of truck platoons: A literature review and directions for future research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 212-228.
    17. Luciano Costa & Claudio Contardo & Guy Desaulniers, 2019. "Exact Branch-Price-and-Cut Algorithms for Vehicle Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 946-985, July.
    18. Dikas, G. & Minis, I., 2014. "Scheduled paratransit transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 18-34.
    19. Masoud, Neda & Jayakrishnan, R., 2017. "A decomposition algorithm to solve the multi-hop Peer-to-Peer ride-matching problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-29.
    20. Bhusiri, Narath & Qureshi, Ali Gul & Taniguchi, Eiichi, 2014. "The trade-off between fixed vehicle costs and time-dependent arrival penalties in a routing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:61-:d:155497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.