IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2780-d759729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization for Feeder Bus Route Model Design with Station Transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Cao

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Dandan Jiang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Shan Wang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

Abstract

To fully take the advantages of conventional bus and subway, and to maximize the overall feeder efficiency of the public transport system, the topic of feeder bus route optimization is studied in this paper. Considering the origin destination demand of passenger flow between subway stations and bus stations and transfer characteristics, the objective function is established with the minimum sum of bus operation cost and passenger travel cost. Taking into account the integrity of the feeder bus route, the rationality of the route, the route capacity and the station transfer factors, the constraints of the optimization model are constructed. Based on the idea of the genetic algorithm, the solution algorithm of the optimization model is developed. The genetic algorithm and enumeration algorithm are used to solve the optimization of the feeder bus route in this case, and the accuracy and efficiency of the solution are analyzed. The influence of the number of feeder bus routes on the system in the case network is compared and discussed. We compare and analyze the differences between the original bus network and the feeder bus network in terms of bus operation cost, passenger flow demand and total passenger travel cost. The research shows that the model and algorithm can find the approximate optimal solution of the feeder bus network scheme related to the subway through fewer iterations. The number of routes in the model has little impact on the whole feeder system, and the optimization scheme using five routes is effective and reasonable in this paper. Compared with the existing bus network, the optimization scheme has obvious advantages in improving the passenger-carrying rate, reducing the per capita travel cost and improving the overall operation efficiency of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Cao & Dandan Jiang & Shan Wang, 2022. "Optimization for Feeder Bus Route Model Design with Station Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2780-:d:759729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jen-Jia Lin & Huei-In Wong, 2014. "Optimization of a feeder-bus route design by using a multiobjective programming approach," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 430-449, July.
    2. Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Chunfeng Yang & Zhihuo Xu & Han Wang, 2018. "Personalised and Coordinated Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Service Design: A Genetic Algorithms Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Lucio Martins, Carlos & Vaz Pato, Margarida, 1998. "Search strategies for the feeder bus network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 425-440, April.
    4. Park, Chung & Lee, Jungpyo & Sohn, So Young, 2019. "Recommendation of feeder bus routes using neural network embedding-based optimization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 329-341.
    5. Xin Li & Ming Wei & Jia Hu & Yun Yuan & Huifu Jiang, 2018. "An Agent-Based Model for Dispatching Real-Time Demand-Responsive Feeder Bus," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, March.
    6. John HE Taplin & Yuchao Sun, 2020. "Optimizing bus stop locations for walking access: Stops-first design of a feeder route to enhance a residential plan," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1237-1259, September.
    7. Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Jun Zeng & Shengrui Zhang, 2017. "Route Design Model of Feeder Bus Service for Urban Rail Transit Stations," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-6, January.
    8. Mohammad Hadi Almasi & Ali Sadollah & Yoonseok Oh & Dong-Kyu Kim & Seungmo Kang, 2018. "Optimal Coordination Strategy for an Integrated Multimodal Transit Feeder Network Design Considering Multiple Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    9. De Zhao & Wei Wang & Amber Woodburn & Megan S. Ryerson, 2017. "Isolating high-priority metro and feeder bus transfers using smart card data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1535-1554, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiayi Li & Zhaocheng He & Jiaming Zhong, 2022. "The Multi-Type Demands Oriented Framework for Flex-Route Transit Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.
    2. Park, Chung & Lee, Jungpyo & Sohn, So Young, 2019. "Recommendation of feeder bus routes using neural network embedding-based optimization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 329-341.
    3. GALARZA MONTENEGRO, Bryan David & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VANSTEENWEGEN, Pieter, 2023. "A demand-responsive feeder service with a maximum headway at mandatory stops," Working Papers 2023001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Alan T. Murray, 2016. "Maximal Coverage Location Problem," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 5-27, January.
    5. Liang, Jinpeng & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Yang, Xin & Lo, Hong K., 2019. "Bus transit network design with uncertainties on the basis of a metro network: A two-step model framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 115-138.
    6. Chen, Enhui & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Transfer station choice in a multimodal transit system: An empirical study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 337-355.
    7. Meina Zheng & Feng Liu & Xiucheng Guo & Xinyue Lei, 2019. "Assessing the Distribution of Commuting Trips and Jobs-Housing Balance Using Smart Card Data: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Chunfeng Yang & Zhihuo Xu & Han Wang, 2018. "Personalised and Coordinated Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Service Design: A Genetic Algorithms Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Bi, Hui & Ye, Zhirui & Hu, Liyang & Zhu, He, 2021. "Why they don't choose bus service? Understanding special online car-hailing behavior near bus stops," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 280-297.
    10. Yu, Yao & Machemehl, Randy B. & Xie, Chi, 2015. "Demand-responsive transit circulator service network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 160-175.
    11. Badia, Hugo & Jenelius, Erik, 2021. "Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 146-172.
    12. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    13. Berrada, Jaâfar & Poulhès, Alexis, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 317-334.
    14. Bo Sun & Ming Wei & Senlai Zhu, 2018. "Optimal Design of Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Services with Passengers’ Multiple Time Windows and Satisfaction," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Sivakumaran, Karthikgeyan & Li, Yuwei & Cassidy, Michael J. & Madanat, Samer, 2010. "Cost-Saving Properties of Schedule Coordination in a Simple Trunk-and-Feeder Transit System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9qr8s3hx, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Xiang Li & Qipeng Yan & Yafeng Ma & Chen Luo, 2023. "Spatially Varying Impacts of Built Environment on Transfer Ridership of Metro and Bus Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Mengjie Zhang & Lei Wang & Huanhuan Feng & Luwei Zhang & Xiaoshuan Zhang & Jun Li, 2020. "Modeling Method for Cost and Carbon Emission of Sheep Transportation Based on Path Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Wu, Pan & Xu, Lunhui & Zhong, Lingshu & Gao, Kun & Qu, Xiaobo & Pei, Mingyang, 2022. "Revealing the determinants of the intermodal transfer ratio between metro and bus systems considering spatial variations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Rich, Jeppe & Seshadri, Ravi & Jomeh, Ali Jamal & Clausen, Sofus Rasmus, 2023. "Fixed routing or demand-responsive? Agent-based modelling of autonomous first and last mile services in light-rail systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Pan Wu & Jinlong Li & Yuzhuang Pian & Xiaochen Li & Zilin Huang & Lunhui Xu & Guilin Li & Ruonan Li, 2022. "How Determinants Affect Transfer Ridership between Metro and Bus Systems: A Multivariate Generalized Poisson Regression Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2780-:d:759729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.