IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1482-d1360055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energy Potentials and Roadmap in Brazil, Austria, and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Henrique Romeu da Silva

    (Faculty of Engineering and Sciences of Guaratinguetá, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

  • Andreas Nascimento

    (Faculty of Engineering and Sciences of Guaratinguetá, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil
    Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Christoph Daniel Baum

    (Faculty of Engineering and Sciences of Guaratinguetá, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

  • Mauro Hugo Mathias

    (Faculty of Engineering and Sciences of Guaratinguetá, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

Abstract

The emerging energy transition is particularly described as a move towards a cleaner, lower-carbon system. In the context of the global shift towards sustainable energy sources, this paper reviews the potential and roadmap for hydrogen energy as a crucial component of the clean energy landscape. The primary objective is to present a comprehensive literature overview, illuminating key themes, trends, and research gaps in the scientific discourse concerning hydrogen production and energy policy. This review focuses particularly on specified geographic contexts, with an emphasis on understanding the unique energy policies related to renewable energy in Brazil, Austria, and Germany. Given their distinct social systems and developmental stages, this paper aims to delineate the nuanced approaches these countries adopt in their pursuit of renewable energy and the integration of hydrogen within their energy frameworks. Brazil exhibits vast renewable energy potential, particularly in wind and solar energy sectors, positioning itself for substantial growth in the coming years. Germany showcases a regulatory framework that promotes innovation and technological expansion, reflecting its highly developed social system and commitment to transitioning away from fossil fuels. Austria demonstrates dedication to decarbonization, particularly through the exploration of biomethane for residential heating and cooling.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Henrique Romeu da Silva & Andreas Nascimento & Christoph Daniel Baum & Mauro Hugo Mathias, 2024. "Renewable Energy Potentials and Roadmap in Brazil, Austria, and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1482-:d:1360055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Kemfert, 2017. "Germany must go back to its low-carbon future," Nature, Nature, vol. 549(7670), pages 26-27, September.
    2. Diógenes, Jamil Ramsi Farkat & Claro, João & Rodrigues, José Coelho, 2019. "Barriers to onshore wind farm implementation in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 253-266.
    3. Crichton, Rohan & Mette, Jehu & Tambo, Erick & Nduhuura, Paul & Nguedia-Nguedoung, Axel, 2023. "The impact of Austria’s climate strategy on renewable energy consumption and economic output," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Leonhard Povacz & Ramchandra Bhandari, 2023. "Analysis of the Levelized Cost of Renewable Hydrogen in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & Ringel, Marc, 2021. "Policy frameworks and voluntary markets for biomethane – How do different policies influence providers’ product strategies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Tasios, Nikos & Paroussos, Leonidas & Capros, Pantelis & Tsani, Stella, 2017. "Energy system impacts and policy implications of the European Intended Nationally Determined Contribution and low-carbon pathway to 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 216-226.
    7. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Nascimento, Nazem & Vieira, Lara Werncke & Romero, Oldrich Joel, 2022. "Possible pathways for oil and gas companies in a sustainable future: From the perspective of a hydrogen economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy E. & Davis, Mark E. & Holstenkamp, Lars, 2018. "Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 772-780.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ettore Bompard & Daniele Grosso & Tao Huang & Francesco Profumo & Xianzhang Lei & Duo Li, 2018. "World Decarbonization through Global Electricity Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Vincenzo Bianco & Annalisa Marchitto & Federico Scarpa & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2020. "Forecasting Energy Consumption in the EU Residential Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Karmegam Dhanabalan & Muthukumar Perumalsamy & Ganesan Sriram & Nagaraj Murugan & Shalu & Thangarasu Sadhasivam & Tae Hwan Oh, 2023. "Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Derived Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) Applications in Fuel Cell Systems: A Review of Current Advancements and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi, 2018. "Future Trajectories of Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Kouvaritakis, Nikos, 2018. "Model-based analysis of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions and 2 °C pathways for major economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 965-978.
    7. Weitzel, Matthias & Vandyck, Toon & Rey Los Santos, Luis & Tamba, Marie & Temursho, Umed & Wojtowicz, Krzysztof, 2023. "A comprehensive socio-economic assessment of EU climate policy pathways," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    8. Ioannis Charalampidis & Panagiotis Karkatsoulis & Pantelis Capros, 2019. "A Regional Economy-Energy-Transport Model of the EU for Assessing Decarbonization in Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Child, Michael & Kemfert, Claudia & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 139, pages 80-101.
    10. Guerin, Turlough F., 2022. "Business model scaling can be used to activate and grow the biogas-to-grid market in Australia to decarbonise hard-to-abate industries: An application of entrepreneurial management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Jenny Palm, 2021. "The Transposition of Energy Communities into Swedish Regulations: Overview and Critique of Emerging Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Jhonathan Fernandes Torres Souza & Sergio Almeida Pacca, 2019. "How far can low-carbon energy scenarios reach based on proven technologies?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 687-705, June.
    14. Jorge Miguel Carneiro Ribeiro & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes, 2018. "Future Perspectives of Biomass Torrefaction: Review of the Current State-Of-The-Art and Research Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Chunguang Sheng & Guangyu Wang & Yude Geng & Lirong Chen, 2020. "The Correlation Analysis of Futures Pricing Mechanism in China’s Carbon Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Sun, Yu & Chen, Lizhen & Sun, Huaping & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2020. "Low-carbon financial risk factor correlation in the belt and road PPP project," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    17. Xue, Shengrong & Zhang, Siqi & Wang, Ying & Wang, Yanbo & Song, Jinghui & Lyu, Xingang & Wang, Xiaojiao & Yang, Gaihe, 2022. "What can we learn from the experience of European countries in biomethane industry: Taking China as an example?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Polzin, Friedemann & Egli, Florian & Steffen, Bjarne & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2019. "How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1249-1268.
    19. Chen, Maozhi & Sinha, Avik & Hu, Kexiang & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim, 2021. "Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Weschenfelder, Franciele & Farias, João Gabriel de & Kamal Ahmad, Muhammad, 2022. "Economic and sensitivity analysis on wind farm end-of-life strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1482-:d:1360055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.