IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i6p2183-d772910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High Specific Capacity of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with Carbon Black/Chitosan- and Carbon Black/Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Coated Separators

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Paniagua-Vásquez

    (Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica)

  • Claudia C. Zuluaga-Gómez

    (Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00931, USA)

  • Sofía Chacón-Vargas

    (Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica)

  • Allan León Calvo

    (Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica)

  • Giovanni Sáenz-Arce

    (Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica)

  • Ram S. Katiyar

    (Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00931, USA)

  • José Javier Saavedra-Arias

    (Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica)

Abstract

In this research, the shuttle effect and the low sulfur activation of lithium–sulfur batteries were mitigated by coating the cathode side of Celgard 2400 separators with mixtures of carbon black/chitosan or carbon black/polyvinylidene fluoride using the simple slurry technique. Carbon nanoparticles and the polar groups of the polymers were responsible for boosting the reaction kinetics of sulfur and the chemical and physical trapping of lithium polysulfides. The adsorption of sulfur species in the coated separators was confirmed by the morphologic changes observed in the AFM and SEM images and by the new elements presented in the EDX spectra after 100 charge/discharge cycles. The high intensity of the peaks in the cyclic voltammograms and the long plateaus in the discharge profiles support the improvement in the reaction kinetics. The batteries with the carbon black/chitosan- and carbon black/polyvinylidene fluoride-coated separators reached high specific discharge capacities of 833 and 698 mAhg −1 , respectively, after 100 cycles at 0.5 C. This is promising for this kind of technology, and detailed results are presented in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Paniagua-Vásquez & Claudia C. Zuluaga-Gómez & Sofía Chacón-Vargas & Allan León Calvo & Giovanni Sáenz-Arce & Ram S. Katiyar & José Javier Saavedra-Arias, 2022. "High Specific Capacity of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with Carbon Black/Chitosan- and Carbon Black/Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Coated Separators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2183-:d:772910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Höök, Mikael & Tang, Xu, 2013. "Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 797-809.
    2. Tan, P. & Jiang, H.R. & Zhu, X.B. & An, L. & Jung, C.Y. & Wu, M.C. & Shi, L. & Shyy, W. & Zhao, T.S., 2017. "Advances and challenges in lithium-air batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 780-806.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dae-Seon Hong & Yeon-Ji Choi & Chang-Su Jin & Kyoung-Hee Shin & Woo-Jin Song & Sun-Hwa Yeon, 2023. "Enhanced Cycle Performance of NiCo 2 O 4 /CNTs Composites in Lithium-Air Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Huang, Qisheng & Xu, Yunjian & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2020. "Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Burton, N.A. & Padilla, R.V. & Rose, A. & Habibullah, H., 2021. "Increasing the efficiency of hydrogen production from solar powered water electrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Anna Borawska & Mariusz Borawski & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska, 2022. "Effectiveness of Electricity-Saving Communication Campaigns: Neurophysiological Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Jing Han Siow & Muhammad Roil Bilad & Wahyu Caesarendra & Jia Jia Leam & Mohammad Azmi Bustam & Nonni Soraya Sambudi & Yusuf Wibisono & Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia, 2021. "Progress in Development of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide as Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Sardarabadi, Mohammad & Hosseinzadeh, Mohammad & Kazemian, Arash & Passandideh-Fard, Mohammad, 2017. "Experimental investigation of the effects of using metal-oxides/water nanofluids on a photovoltaic thermal system (PVT) from energy and exergy viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 682-695.
    7. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Hsieh, I-Yun Lisa & Pan, Menghsuan Sam & Chiang, Yet-Ming & Green, William H., 2019. "Learning only buys you so much: Practical limits on battery price reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 218-224.
    9. Delsoto, G.S. & Battisti, F.G. & da Silva, A.K., 2023. "Dynamic modeling and control of a solar-powered Brayton cycle using supercritical CO2 and optimization of its thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 336-356.
    10. Emily J. Kothe & Mathew Ling & Barbara A. Mullan & Joshua J. Rhee & Anna Klas, 2023. "Increasing intention to reduce fossil fuel use: a protection motivation theory-based experimental study," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Leena Grandell & Mikael Höök, 2015. "Assessing Rare Metal Availability Challenges for Solar Energy Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Wang, Yuanhui & Hao, Liang & Bai, Minli, 2022. "Modeling the multi-step discharge and charge reaction mechanisms of non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    13. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Mérida, Walter & Sadiq, Rehan, 2019. "Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 558-573.
    14. Konstantinos Kappis & Joan Papavasiliou & George Avgouropoulos, 2021. "Methanol Reforming Processes for Fuel Cell Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Yue, Xiufeng & Patankar, Neha & Decarolis, Joseph & Chiodi, Alessandro & Rogan, Fionn & Deane, J.P. & O’Gallachoir, Brian, 2020. "Least cost energy system pathways towards 100% renewable energy in Ireland by 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2020. "Coupling small batteries and PV generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Yapicioglu, Arda & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "A review on clean ammonia as a potential fuel for power generators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 96-108.
    18. Minglu Ma & Min Su & Shuyu Li & Feng Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Predicting Coal Consumption in South Africa Based on Linear (Metabolic Grey Model), Nonlinear (Non-Linear Grey Model), and Combined (Metabolic Grey Model-Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Duffner, Fabian & Mauler, Lukas & Wentker, Marc & Leker, Jens & Winter, Martin, 2021. "Large-scale automotive battery cell manufacturing: Analyzing strategic and operational effects on manufacturing costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Contento, Gaetano & Lorenzi, Bruno & Rizzo, Antonella & Narducci, Dario, 2017. "Efficiency enhancement of a-Si and CZTS solar cells using different thermoelectric hybridization strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 230-238.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2183-:d:772910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.