IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2042-d531766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principles of Sustainable Management of Energy Companies: The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Elżbieta Jędrych

    (Faculty of Business and International Relations, Vistula University, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz Klimek

    (Faculty of Management and Production Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Rzepka

    (Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

In 2016, a law was introduced in Poland that required management bodies of energy companies owned by the state and a municipality to adopt management goals. The remuneration of the board members of these companies depended on the extent to which these goals were implemented. The challenge was that profit became an end in itself. The purpose of this article is to describe the process used to set up strategic goals on the basis of balancing capital within energy companies, which demonstrates a positive impact on the effectiveness of these companies. The solution proposed in this article is an alternative to using profit as the sole measure. The article consists of three parts. The first part is a review of the literature on management goals and how they relate to various economic measures—the main conclusions of this literature review were that, despite many attempts, we were not able to (1) clearly define the purpose of a company and (2) find an indisputable measure of the degree to which such goals were implemented in a firm that would be an alternative to using the outdated profit as a goal. The second part dealt with the results of a study on the formulation of management goals in 2017–2020, which was conducted on more than 150 energy companies. Based on this analysis, it was found that financial goals were gradually replaced by material (investment) goals, but this process was very slow. The final part of the article is our proposal for a new approach to formulating management goals in energy companies, linking them to tools that measure both the efficiency of capital deployment and the introduction of new rules for sustainable capital management in these companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Elżbieta Jędrych & Dariusz Klimek & Agnieszka Rzepka, 2021. "Principles of Sustainable Management of Energy Companies: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2042-:d:531766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dariusz Klimek, 2020. "Sustainable Enterprise Capital Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Caroline Lambert & Samuel Sponem, 2005. "Corporate governance and profit manipulation: a French field study," Post-Print halshs-00170340, HAL.
    3. Henryk Dzwigol & Mariola Dzwigol-Barosz & Radosław Miśkiewicz & Aleksy Kwilinski, 2020. "Manager competency assessment model in the conditions of industry 4.0," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2630-2644, June.
    4. Keen, Steve & Standish, Russell, 2006. "Profit maximization, industry structure, and competition: A critique of neoclassical theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 370(1), pages 81-85.
    5. Yasemin Y. Kor & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2000. "Penrose’s Resource‐Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-1, January.
    6. Frederick B. Hawley, 1908. "The Controversy about the Capital Concept," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 22(3), pages 467-475.
    7. Ilídio Barreto, 2012. "A Behavioral Theory of Market Expansion Based on the Opportunity Prospects Rule," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1008-1023, August.
    8. Daraban Marius Costin, 2017. "Economic Value Added – A General Review of the Concept," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 168-173, June.
    9. Penrose, Edith T., 1960. "The Growth of the Firm—A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Dariusz Klimek & Elżbieta Jędrych, 2020. "A Model for the Sustainable Management of Enterprise Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1373 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    14. Linda Argote & Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm ---40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kusio Tomasz & Miśkiewicz Radosław & Borowiecki Ryszard & Fijałkowska Justyna & Rzepka Agnieszka & Gross-Gołacka Elwira & Ristvej Jozef, 2023. "Startups: the Global Context of Functioning and the Need for Innovation Openness," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 50-77, September.
    2. Piotr F. Borowski, 2022. "Mitigating Climate Change and the Development of Green Energy versus a Return to Fossil Fuels Due to the Energy Crisis in 2022," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Agnieszka Laskowska & Jan Franciszek Laskowski, 2022. "“Silver” Generation at Work—Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Management in the Industry 5.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Artem Stopochkin & Inessa Sytnik & Janusz Wielki & Elżbieta Karaś, 2022. "Transformation of the Concept of Talent Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution as the Basis for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Lukman Raimi & Mirela Panait & Adriana Grigorescu & Valentina Vasile, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Telecommunication Industry—Driver of Entrepreneurship," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dariusz Klimek & Elżbieta Jędrych, 2020. "A Model for the Sustainable Management of Enterprise Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Bart Leten & Rene Belderbos & Bart Van Looy, 2016. "Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1257-1291, December.
    3. Ilídio Barreto, 2012. "A Behavioral Theory of Market Expansion Based on the Opportunity Prospects Rule," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1008-1023, August.
    4. DeCanio, Stephen J. & Watkins, William E., 1998. "Information processing and organizational structure," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 275-294, August.
    5. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Orue & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2022. "Competitive Improvement through Integrated Management of Sales and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner Güth & M. Vittoria Levati & Jianying Qiu, 2006. "Satisficing in sales competition: experimental evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    7. Michaël Lainé, 2014. "Vers une alternative au paradigme de la rationalité ? Victoires et déboires du programme spinoziste en économie," Post-Print hal-01335618, HAL.
    8. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    9. Hosseini, Hamid, 2003. "The arrival of behavioral economics: from Michigan, or the Carnegie School in the 1950s and the early 1960s?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 391-409, September.
    10. Elisa Giuliani & Federica Nieri & Andrea Vezzulli, 2019. "BEST IN CLASS BUT BIG WRONGDOERS: Exploring the financial performance and human rights infringe ments nexus in large emerging country companies," Discussion Papers 2019/250, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.
    12. Sander van der Hoog, 2017. "Deep Learning in (and of) Agent-Based Models: A Prospectus," Papers 1706.06302, arXiv.org.
    13. Prietula, Michael J. & Watson, Harry S., 2008. "When behavior matters: Games and computation in A Behavioral Theory of the Firm," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 74-94, April.
    14. Feng, Lei & Zhang, Minghui & Li, Yixin & Jiang, Yan, 2020. "Satisfaction principle or efficiency principle? Decision-making behavior of peasant households in China’s rural land market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Feduzi, Alberto & Runde, Jochen, 2014. "Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 268-283.
    16. Meinard, Y. & Tsoukiàs, A., 2019. "On the rationality of decision aiding processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1074-1084.
    17. Tina Kalayil & Somya Tyagi & Mahfuza Khatun & Sikandar Siddiqui, 2019. "A Risk-Sensitive Momentum Approach To Stock Selection," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 64(220), pages 61-84, January –.
    18. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner Güth & M. Levati & Jianying Qiu, 2011. "Satisficing search versus aspiration adaptation in sales competition: experimental evidence," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(1), pages 179-198, February.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3528 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Arkadiy V. Sakhartov & Timothy B. Folta, 2013. "Rationalizing Organizational Change: A Need for Comparative Testing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1140-1156, August.
    21. Tyson, Christopher J., 2008. "Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 51-70, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2042-:d:531766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.