IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6430-d651797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Lower Carbon Aviation Fuels (LCAF) Really Complement Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) towards EU Aviation Decarbonization?

Author

Listed:
  • David Chiaramonti

    (“Galileo Ferraris” Energy Department, Politecnico Di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
    Renewable Energy Consortium for Research and Development (RE-CORD), Viale Kennedy 182, 50038 Scarperia e San Piero, Italy)

  • Giacomo Talluri

    (Renewable Energy Consortium for Research and Development (RE-CORD), Viale Kennedy 182, 50038 Scarperia e San Piero, Italy)

  • George Vourliotakis

    (EXERGIA S.A., Energy and Environment Consultants, 10571 Athens, Greece)

  • Lorenzo Testa

    (“Galileo Ferraris” Energy Department, Politecnico Di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Matteo Prussi

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Nicolae Scarlat

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy)

Abstract

The present work provides an analysis of the potential impact of fossil-based Low Carbon Aviation Fuels (LCAF) for the European aviation sector, with a time horizon to 2050. LCAF are a crude-derived alternative to kerosene, offering some Green House Gas (GHG) savings, and have been defined by ICAO as eligible fuels for mitigating the environmental impact of aviation. A methodological framework to evaluate the EU technical potential for LCAF production is developed, based on data on crude utilization for jet fuel production in EU refineries, relevant carbon intensity reduction technologies, market prices, and aviation fuel volumes. Two different baselines for fossil-derived kerosene carbon intensity (CI) are considered: a global figure of 89 g CO2e /MJ and an EU-27-specific one of 93.1 g CO2eq /MJ. Three scenarios considering increasing levels of CI reduction are then defined, taking into account the current and potential commercial availability of some of the most relevant carbon intensity reduction technologies. The analysis demonstrates that, even if LCAF could offer GHG saving opportunities, their possible impact, especially when compared to the ambition level set in the most recent European legislative proposals, is very limited in most of the analysed scenarios, with the exception of the most ambitious ones. At 2030, a non-zero technical potential is projected only in the higher CI reduction scenario, ranging between 1.8% and 14.2% of LCAF market share in the EU-27 (equal to 0.6 to 4.75 Mtoe), depending on the considered Baseline for CI. At 2050, almost all considered scenarios project a larger technical potential, ranging between 6.9% and 22.2% for the global Baseline (2.21 to 7.13 Mtoe), and between 1.8% and 16.2% for the EU-27 Baseline (0.58 to 5.2 Mtoe). LCAF additional costs to current production costs are also discussed, given their relevance in large-scale deployment of these technologies, and are projected to range between 39 and 46.8 USD/toe.

Suggested Citation

  • David Chiaramonti & Giacomo Talluri & George Vourliotakis & Lorenzo Testa & Matteo Prussi & Nicolae Scarlat, 2021. "Can Lower Carbon Aviation Fuels (LCAF) Really Complement Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) towards EU Aviation Decarbonization?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6430-:d:651797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahal, Karna & Brynolf, Selma & Xisto, Carlos & Hansson, Julia & Grahn, Maria & Grönstedt, Tomas & Lehtveer, Mariliis, 2021. "Techno-economic review of alternative fuels and propulsion systems for the aviation sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Prussi, Matteo & Lee, Uisung & Wang, Michael & Malina, Robert & Valin, Hugo & Taheripour, Farzad & Velarde, César & Staples, Mark D. & Lonza, Laura & Hileman, James I., 2021. "CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Abdul-Manan, Amir F.N. & Arfaj, Abdullah & Babiker, Hassan, 2017. "Oil refining in a CO2 constrained world: Effects of carbon pricing on refineries globally," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 264-275.
    4. Chiaramonti, David & Talluri, Giacomo & Scarlat, Nicolae & Prussi, Matteo, 2021. "The challenge of forecasting the role of biofuel in EU transport decarbonisation at 2050: A meta-analysis review of published scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prussi, M. & Weindorf, W. & Buffi, M. & Sánchez López, J. & Scarlat, N., 2021. "Are algae ready to take off? GHG emission savings of algae-to-kerosene production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    2. Seber, Gonca & Escobar, Neus & Valin, Hugo & Malina, Robert, 2022. "Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable aviation fuels from vegetable oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Lundberg, Liv & Cintas Sanchez, Olivia & Zetterholm, Jonas, 2023. "The impact of blending mandates on biofuel consumption, production, emission reductions and fuel prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Tian, Xuelin & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Zhikun, 2023. "The role of clean energy in achieving decarbonization of electricity generation, transportation, and heating sectors by 2050: A meta-analysis review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas, 2023. "Net-zero aviation: Time for a new business model?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Tobias Mueller & Steven Gronau, 2023. "Fostering Macroeconomic Research on Hydrogen-Powered Aviation: A Systematic Literature Review on General Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Morenike Ajike Peters & Carine Tondo Alves & Jude Azubuike Onwudili, 2023. "A Review of Current and Emerging Production Technologies for Biomass-Derived Sustainable Aviation Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-40, August.
    8. Huang, Yi & Yi, Qun & Wei, Guo-qiang & Kang, Jing-xian & Li, Wen-ying & Feng, Jie & Xie, Ke-chang, 2018. "Energy use, greenhouse gases emission and cost effectiveness of an integrated high– and low–temperature Fisher–Tropsch synthesis plant from a lifecycle viewpoint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1009-1019.
    9. Matteo Prussi & Lorenzo Laveneziana & Lorenzo Testa & David Chiaramonti, 2022. "Comparing e-Fuels and Electrification for Decarbonization of Heavy-Duty Transports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Zhao, Shujie & Song, Qingbin & Zhao, Dongfeng & Wang, Yongqiang, 2023. "Identifying the spatiotemporal carbon footprint of the petroleum refining industry and its mitigation potential in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Katarzyna Czech & Michał Wielechowski, 2021. "Is the Alternative Energy Sector COVID-19 Resistant? Comparison with the Conventional Energy Sector: Markov-Switching Model Analysis of Stock Market Indices of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Li, Zhengbing & Liang, Yongtu & Ni, Weilong & Liao, Qi & Xu, Ning & Li, Lichao & Zheng, Jianqin & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Pipesharing: economic-environmental benefits from transporting biofuels through multiproduct pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Zoppi, Giulia & Tito, Edoardo & Bianco, Isabella & Pipitone, Giuseppe & Pirone, Raffaele & Bensaid, Samir, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of the biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass in a hydrothermal liquefaction – aqueous phase reforming integrated biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 375-385.
    14. Aditya Prana Iswara & Jerry Dwi Trijoyo Purnomo & Lin-Han Chiang Hsieh & Aulia Ulfah Farahdiba & Andrian Dolfriandra Huruta, 2022. "More Is More? The Inquiry of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Upstream Petroleum Fields of Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Svetlana Proskurina & Clara Mendoza-Martinez, 2023. "Expectations for Bioenergy Considering Carbon Neutrality Targets in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Jenny Trinh & Fumi Harahap & Anton Fagerström & Julia Hansson, 2021. "What Are the Policy Impacts on Renewable Jet Fuel in Sweden?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    17. Olanipekun, Ifedolapo Olabisi & Alola, Andrew Adewale, 2020. "Crude oil production in the Persian Gulf amidst geopolitical risk, cost of damage and resources rents: Is there asymmetric inference?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Monica Grosso & Fabio Luis Marques dos Santos & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Marcin Stępniak & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "The Role of Research and Innovation in Europe for the Decarbonisation of Waterborne Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Carroll, James & Brazil, William & Howard, Michael & Denny, Eleanor, 2022. "Imperfect emissions information during flight choices and the role of CO2 labelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Liang Jing & Hassan M. El-Houjeiri & Jean-Christophe Monfort & James Littlefield & Amjaad Al-Qahtani & Yash Dixit & Raymond L. Speth & Adam R. Brandt & Mohammad S. Masnadi & Heather L. MacLean & Willi, 2022. "Understanding variability in petroleum jet fuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions to inform aviation decarbonization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6430-:d:651797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.