IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5635-d631276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

At what Pressure Shall CO 2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Roussanaly

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Sem Sælandsvei 11, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Han Deng

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Sem Sælandsvei 11, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Geir Skaugen

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Sem Sælandsvei 11, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Truls Gundersen

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Kolbjørn Hejes Vei 1B, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

The pipeline has historically been the preferred means to transport CO 2 due to its low cost for short distances and opportunities for economies of scale. However, interest in vessel-based transport of CO 2 is growing. While most of the literature has assumed that CO 2 shipping would take place at low pressure (at 7 barg and −46 °C), the issue of identifying best transport conditions, in terms of pressure, temperature, and gas composition, is becoming more relevant as ship-based carbon capture and storage chains move towards implementation. This study focuses on an in-depth comparison of the two primary and relevant transport pressures, 7 and 15 barg, for annual volumes up to 20 MtCO 2 /year and transport distances up to 2000 km. We also address the impact of a number of key factors on optimal transport conditions, including (a) transport between harbours versus transport to an offshore site, (b) CO 2 pressure prior to conditioning, (c) the presence of impurities and of purity constraints, and (d) maximum feasible ship capacities for the 7 and 15 barg options. Overall, we have found that 7 barg shipping is the most cost-efficient option for the combinations of distance and annual volume where transport by ship is the cost-optimal means of transport. Furthermore, 7 barg shipping can enable significant cost reductions (beyond 30%) compared to 15 barg shipping for a wide range of annual volume capacities.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Roussanaly & Han Deng & Geir Skaugen & Truls Gundersen, 2021. "At what Pressure Shall CO 2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5635-:d:631276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 2: The offshore and the onshore processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 793-804, June.
    2. Al Baroudi, Hisham & Awoyomi, Adeola & Patchigolla, Kumar & Jonnalagadda, Kranthi & Anthony, E.J., 2021. "A review of large-scale CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilisation and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Munkejord, Svend Tollak & Hammer, Morten & Løvseth, Sigurd W., 2016. "CO2 transport: Data and models – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 499-523.
    4. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 1," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 781-792, June.
    5. Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir & Edoardo De Lena & Matteo Romano & Simon Roussanaly & Mari Voldsund & José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo & David Berstad & Chao Fu & Rahul Anantharaman & Daniel Sutter & Matteo Gaz, 2019. "Comparison of Technologies for CO 2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Aspelund, Audun & Tveit, Steinar P. & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 3: The combined carrier and onshore storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 805-814, June.
    7. Jung, Jung-Yeul & Huh, Cheol & Kang, Seong-Gil & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2013. "CO2 transport strategy and its cost estimation for the offshore CCS in Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1054-1060.
    8. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 4: Sensitivity analysis of transport pressures and benchmarking with conv," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 815-825, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stian Trædal & Jacob Hans Georg Stang & Ingrid Snustad & Martin Viktor Johansson & David Berstad, 2021. "CO 2 Liquefaction Close to the Triple Point Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Wentao Gong & Eryk Remiezowicz & Philip Loldrup Fosbøl & Nicolas von Solms, 2022. "Design and Analysis of Novel CO 2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.
    4. Golrokh Sani, Ahmad & Najafi, Hamidreza & Azimi, Seyedeh Shakiba, 2022. "Dynamic thermal modeling of the refrigerated liquified CO2 tanker in carbon capture, utilization, and storage chain: A truck transport case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al Baroudi, Hisham & Awoyomi, Adeola & Patchigolla, Kumar & Jonnalagadda, Kranthi & Anthony, E.J., 2021. "A review of large-scale CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilisation and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Querol, E. & Gonzalez-Regueral, B. & García-Torrent, J. & Ramos, Alberto, 2011. "Available power generation cycles to be coupled with the liquid natural gas (LNG) vaporization process in a Spanish LNG terminal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2382-2390, July.
    3. Obara, Shin'ya & Kikuchi, Yoshinobu & Ishikawa, Kyosuke & Kawai, Masahito & Yoshiaki, Kashiwaya, 2015. "Development of a compound energy system for cold region houses using small-scale natural gas cogeneration and a gas hydrate battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 280-295.
    4. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Hou, Yu-Lin & Hung, Chen-I, 2011. "A theoretical analysis of the capture of greenhouse gases by single water droplet at atmospheric and elevated pressures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5120-5130.
    5. Chi, Chung-Cheng & Lin, Ta-Hui, 2013. "Oxy-oil combustion characteristics of an existing furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 923-930.
    6. Kim, Juwon & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2016. "Economic evaluation of a new small-scale LNG supply chain using liquid nitrogen for natural-gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 154-163.
    7. Jordán, Pérez Sánchez & Javier Eduardo, Aguillón Martínez & Zdzislaw, Mazur Czerwiec & Alan Martín, Zavala Guzmán & Liborio, Huante Pérez & Jesús Antonio, Flores Zamudio & Mario Román, Díaz Guillén, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture to a pilot cogeneration system in Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1107-1119.
    8. Obara, Shin’ya & Yamada, Takanobu & Matsumura, Kazuhiro & Takahashi, Shiro & Kawai, Masahito & Rengarajan, Balaji, 2011. "Operational planning of an engine generator using a high pressure working fluid composed of CO2 hydrate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4733-4741.
    9. Baccanelli, Margaret & Langé, Stefano & Rocco, Matteo V. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Colombo, Emanuela, 2016. "Low temperature techniques for natural gas purification and LNG production: An energy and exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 546-559.
    10. Guo, Hao & Tang, Qixiong & Gong, Maoqiong & Cheng, Kuiwei, 2018. "Optimization of a novel liquefaction process based on Joule–Thomson cycle utilizing high-pressure natural gas exergy by genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 696-706.
    11. Pérez Sánchez, Jordán & Aguillón Martínez, Javier Eduardo & Mazur Czerwiec, Zdzislaw & Zavala Guzmán, Alan Martín, 2019. "Theoretical assessment of integration of CCS in the Mexican electrical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 828-840.
    12. Li, Gang & Li, Xiao-Sen & Yang, Bo & Duan, Li-Ping & Huang, Ning-Sheng & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Liang-Guang, 2013. "The use of dual horizontal wells in gas production from hydrate accumulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1303-1310.
    13. Jiang, Xi & Akber Hassan, Wasim A. & Gluyas, Jon, 2013. "Modelling and monitoring of geological carbon storage: A perspective on cross-validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 784-792.
    14. Khan, Mohd Shariq & Lee, Sanggyu & Rangaiah, G.P. & Lee, Moonyong, 2013. "Knowledge based decision making method for the selection of mixed refrigerant systems for energy efficient LNG processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1018-1031.
    15. Lee, Inkyu & Park, Jinwoo & You, Fengqi & Moon, Il, 2019. "A novel cryogenic energy storage system with LNG direct expansion regasification: Design, energy optimization, and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 691-705.
    16. Karjunen, Hannu & Tynjälä, Tero & Hyppänen, Timo, 2017. "A method for assessing infrastructure for CO2 utilization: A case study of Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 33-43.
    17. Wang, Xucen & Li, Min & Cai, Liuxi & Li, Yun, 2020. "Propane and iso-butane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process for small-scale skid-mounted natural gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Mokhtar, Marwan & Ali, Muhammad Tauha & Khalilpour, Rajab & Abbas, Ali & Shah, Nilay & Hajaj, Ahmed Al & Armstrong, Peter & Chiesa, Matteo & Sgouridis, Sgouris, 2012. "Solar-assisted Post-combustion Carbon Capture feasibility study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 668-676.
    19. Morandin, Matteo & Maréchal, François & Mercangöz, Mehmet & Buchter, Florian, 2012. "Conceptual design of a thermo-electrical energy storage system based on heat integration of thermodynamic cycles – Part A: Methodology and base case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 375-385.
    20. García, Ramón Ferreiro & Carril, Jose Carbia & Gomez, Javier Romero & Gomez, Manuel Romero, 2016. "Combined cascaded Rankine and direct expander based power units using LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold as heat sink in LNG regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 16-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5635-:d:631276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.