IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5928-d889272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Analysis of Novel CO 2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS

Author

Listed:
  • Wentao Gong

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Center for Energy Resources Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 229, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Eryk Remiezowicz

    (Air Products, Kiełczowska 62A, 51-315 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Philip Loldrup Fosbøl

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Center for Energy Resources Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 229, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Nicolas von Solms

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Center for Energy Resources Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 229, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

In this work, CO 2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS sequestration are modelled using the software APSEN HYSYS V11. This study uses the captured CO 2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed stream contains water, H 2 S, and CO as contaminants. The purification processes for dehydration, desulfurization, and CO removal are reviewed. Two liquefaction approaches, the open-cycle and the closed-cycle liquefaction, are modelled and compared for transport pressures 7 and 15 bar. It is found that the energy requirement of the open-cycle process is higher than that of the closed-cycle liquefaction process. For the closed-cycle design, two refrigerants, ammonia and propane, are considered. Results show that the energy requirement of the process using ammonia is lower than that of propane. When comparing the two transport pressures, it is found that liquefaction at 15 bar requires less energy than 7 bar. On top of that, both refrigerants are unsuited for the liquefaction of CO 2 at 7 bar, as their operating pressures are below 1 atm. Several optimization concepts are tested on the closed-cycle liquefaction design. The net power consumption of the closed-cycle liquefaction is reduced when CO 2 is precooled using the intermediate pressure ammonia streams and the cold from the CO stripper.

Suggested Citation

  • Wentao Gong & Eryk Remiezowicz & Philip Loldrup Fosbøl & Nicolas von Solms, 2022. "Design and Analysis of Novel CO 2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5928-:d:889272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Roussanaly & Han Deng & Geir Skaugen & Truls Gundersen, 2021. "At what Pressure Shall CO 2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golrokh Sani, Ahmad & Najafi, Hamidreza & Azimi, Seyedeh Shakiba, 2022. "Dynamic thermal modeling of the refrigerated liquified CO2 tanker in carbon capture, utilization, and storage chain: A truck transport case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Stian Trædal & Jacob Hans Georg Stang & Ingrid Snustad & Martin Viktor Johansson & David Berstad, 2021. "CO 2 Liquefaction Close to the Triple Point Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5928-:d:889272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.